-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b29_alalal-h18862.xml
150 lines (150 loc) · 7.13 KB
/
cod-al7b29_alalal-h18862.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 10</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 10</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Be" n="cod-al7b29">Paris 1894, v. 29</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Be" n="562"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-h18862"><!-- l4d16a10 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-h18862-Hd1e99">Articulus 10</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-h18862-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An contritio semper eodem modo fuerit
in Novo et Veteri Testamento?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Be" n="73"/>ARTICULUS X.
<lb ed="#Be" n="74"/>An contritio semper eodem modo fuerit
<lb ed="#Be" n="75"/>in Novo et Veteri Testamento?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Be" n="76"/>Quinto queritur, Utrum eodem modo
<lb ed="#Be" n="77"/>semper fuerit in Novo et Veteri
Testa<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="78"/>mento?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e122">
<lb ed="#Be" n="79"/>Videtur autem, quod sic : quia
<lb ed="#Be" n="80"/>1. Cujus causa uno et eodem modo se
<lb ed="#Be" n="81"/>habet, et ipsum eodem modo se_habet:
<lb ed="#Be" n="82"/>sed actuale est causa contritionis : et
e0<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="83"/>dem modo fuit in Novo et Veteri Testa~
<lb ed="#Be" n="84"/>mento : ergo et contritio fuit eodem
<lb ed="#Be" n="85"/>modo.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e141">
<lb ed="#Be" n="86"/>2. Item, Contritio non ordinatur
con<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="87"/>tra peccatum nature, sed potius
perso<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="88"/>ne: et haec semper divisa fuerunt, et
<lb ed="#Be" n="89"/>sunt, et erunt : ergo videtur, quod re-
<pb ed="#Be" n="563"/>
<cb ed="#Be" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="1"/>medium actualis semper debuit esse per
<lb ed="#Be" n="2"/>modum unum :; ergo uno modo fuit
con<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="3"/>tritio in Novo et Veteri Testamento.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e163">
<lb ed="#Be" n="4"/>3. Item, Joel, mu, 12, dicitur, <quote xml:id="alalal-h18862-Qd1e167">
Conver<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="5"/>timini ad me</quote>. Et post, y. 13: <quote xml:id="alalal-h18862-Qd1e172">Scindite
<lb ed="#Be" n="6"/>corda vestra</quote>, etc. Sed nihil aliud
impo<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="7"/>nitur contrito et poenitenti in Novo
Te<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="8"/>stamento : ergo videtur, quod eodem
mo<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="9"/>do, etc.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e185">
<lb ed="#Be" n="10"/>SED CONTRA :
<lb ed="#Be" n="11"/>i. Aliw dus partes, scilicet confessio,
<lb ed="#Be" n="12"/>et satisiactio, non erant eodem modo ut
<lb ed="#Be" n="13"/>nunc ; ergo nec contritio.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e196">
<lb ed="#Be" n="14"/>2, Item, <quote xml:id="alalal-h18862-Qd1e200"
source="http://scta.info/resource/hebr7_19@1-6">Nihil ad perfectum adducit
<lb ed="#Be" n="15"/>lex</quote>, ut dicitur, <ref xml:id="alalal-h18862-Rd1e205">ad Hebr. vu, 19</ref> : ergo
<lb ed="#Be" n="16"/>non competebat ei sacramentum
perfe<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="17"/>ctionis : sed contritio prout observatur
<lb ed="#Be" n="18"/>in Novo Testamento, ducit ad
perfectio<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="19"/>nem: ergo in Veteri Testamento debuit
<lb ed="#Be" n="20"/>esse secundum typum, et minus, ut
vi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="21"/>detur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e221">
<lb ed="#Be" n="22"/>Solutio. Dicendum, quod contritio
<lb ed="#Be" n="23"/>fuit in Veteri Testamento sicut in Novo :
<lb ed="#Be" n="24"/>sicut probant prime rationes.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e230">
<lb ed="#Be" n="25"/>Ad Hoc autem quod contra objicitur,
<lb ed="#Be" n="26"/>dicendum quod aliud est de confessione
<lb ed="#Be" n="27"/>et satisfactione, quia illa habebant fieri
<lb ed="#Be" n="28"/>ministerio sacerdotum : unde cum alii
<lb ed="#Be" n="29"/>fuerint sacerdotes status illius, et alii
<lb ed="#Be" n="30"/>status istius, non poterant ille due:
par<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="31"/>tes esse eodem modo in Novo et Veteri
<lb ed="#Be" n="32"/>Testamento. Sed in contritione non
re<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="33"/>spicitur nisi Deus qui peccata delet: et
<lb ed="#Be" n="34"/>ideo illa. semper eodem modo fuit
sem<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="35"/>per et in lege nature, et Moysi, et
gra<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="36"/>tie.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e260">
<lb ed="#Be" n="37"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod contritio li~
<lb ed="#Be" n="38"/>cet in lege sit observata, non tamen est
<lb ed="#Be" n="39"/>legis sicut moralia mandata, ut
disputa<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="40"/>tum est supra tertium Sententiarum, in
<lb ed="#Be" n="41"/>fine : et ideo contritio potuit aliquid
du<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="42"/>cere ad perfectum in fide venturi.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h18862-d1e276">
<lb ed="#Be" n="43"/>Et per hoc patet solutio ad totum.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>