-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b29_alalal-h51647.xml
288 lines (288 loc) · 15 KB
/
cod-al7b29_alalal-h51647.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 33</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 33</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Be" n="cod-al7b29">Paris 1894, v. 29</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Be" n="704"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-h51647"><!-- l4d17a33 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-h51647-Hd1e99">Articulus 33</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-h51647-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An verum sit hoc dictum Magistri di-
centis, Lavant lacryme delictum, quod
voce pudor est coniiteri?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Be" n="36"/>ARTICULUS XXXII.
<lb ed="#Be" n="37"/>An verum sit hoc dictum Magistri di-
<lb ed="#Be" n="38"/>centis, Lavant lacryme delictum, quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="39"/>voce pudor est coniiteri?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e115">
<lb ed="#Be" n="40"/>Deinde queritur de hoc quod dicit,
<lb ed="#Be" n="41"/>ibi, GC, post initium : <quote xml:id="alalal-h51647-Qd1e121"> Lavant lacryme_
<lb ed="#Be" n="42"/>delictum, quod voce pudor est confiteri,
<lb ed="#Be" n="43"/>eto. </quote> .
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e129">
<cb ed="#Be" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="44"/>Aut enim hoc intelligitur, quod cum
<lb ed="#Be" n="45"/>pudore confitetur aliquis : aut sic, quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="46"/>pudor esset si confiteretur. Si primo
mo<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="47"/>do : tunc nihil esset, quod sequitur :
<lb ed="#Be" n="48"/>
<quote xml:id="alalal-h51647-Qd1e144"> Venie ftletus consulit, et verecundiae : </quote>
<lb ed="#Be" n="49"/>non enim consulit verecundia, si vere.
<lb ed="#Be" n="50"/>cundiam confitendo subire oportet. Si
<lb ed="#Be" n="51"/>autem secundo modo : tune erit contra.
<lb ed="#Be" n="52"/>hoc quod dixit idem Ambrosius: <quote xml:id="alalal-h51647-Qd1e155">
La<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="53"/>crymas Petri lego, satisfactionem non
<lb ed="#Be" n="54"/>lego. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e164">
<lb ed="#Be" n="55"/>2. Praeterea, Quid est quod dicit :
<lb ed="#Be" n="56"/>
<quote xml:id="alalal-h51647-Qd1e170"> Quod defendi non potest, ablui
pot<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="57"/>est: </quote> si enim absolvitur, tunc videtur
<lb ed="#Be" n="58"/>quod ad notitiam veniat absotventis’: et
<lb ed="#Be" n="59"/>ideo non valet ad propositum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e180">
<lb ed="#Be" n="60"/>3. Praeterea, Videtur nihil esse quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="61"/>dicit : quia si peccatum non potest
de<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="62"/>fendi, in nullo judicio debet absolvi reus :
<lb ed="#Be" n="63"/>ergo si absolvitur peccator, potest
defen<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="64"/>di: et ita nihil dicit, <quote xml:id="alalal-h51647-Qd1e193"> Quod defendi non
<lb ed="#Be" n="65"/>potest, ablui potest. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e199">
<lb ed="#Be" n="66"/>Prarerea queritur ulterius hic, Utrum
<lb ed="#Be" n="67"/>hee opinio sit herctica vel possit
susti<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="68"/>neri?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e208">
<lb ed="#Be" n="69"/>Videtur autem, quod possit sustineri :
<lb ed="#Be" n="70"/>quia .
<lb ed="#Be" n="71"/>1.Tam hic quam etiam in Decreto
re<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="72"/>citatur tantum pro opinione, et non pro
<lb ed="#Be" n="73"/>errore : ergo videtur, quod Ecclesia
opi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="74"/>nionem et non errorem judicat illud.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e224">
<lb ed="#Be" n="75"/>2. Item, Non semper fuit hic usus,
<lb ed="#Be" n="76"/>quod homo homini confiteretur : ergo
<lb ed="#Be" n="77"/>videtur, quod non sit de moralibus quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="78"/>homo homini conifiteatur, quia moralia
<lb ed="#Be" n="79"/>semper tenent : et constat etiam quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="80"/>non est de credendis, cum etiam non sit
<lb ed="#Be" n="81"/>articulus fidei, nec etiam reductum ad ar-|
<lb ed="#Be" n="82"/>ticulum aliquem : ergo nec de credendis
<lb ed="#Be" n="83"/>est, nec de necessario faciendis : in
om<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="84"/>nibus talibus autem dicunt Magistri,
<lb ed="#Be" n="85"/>quod possumus opinari pro utraque
par<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="86"/>te : ergo illud est de opinabilibus, et non
<lb ed="#Be" n="87"/>est judicandam hereticum quod illi
di<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="88"/>cunt.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e257">
<lb ed="#Be" n="89"/>3. Item, Augustinus et Bernardus
di<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="90"/>stinguunt credenda et intelligenda et
opi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="91"/>nanda, dicentes, quia quod credimus, de-.
<pb ed="#Be" n="705"/>
<cb ed="#Be" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="1"/>pemus auctoritati : quod intelligimus,
<lb ed="#Be" n="2"/>yationi : quod opinamur, errori sive
in<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="3"/>certitudini dubitationis : sed in ista
que<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="4"/>stione certam canonis Bibliae non
habe<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="5"/>mus auctoritatem, ergo non est de
cre<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="6"/>dendis : nec habemus firmam ac stabilem
<lb ed="#Be" n="7"/>yarionem, ergo non est de intelligendis :
<lb ed="#Be" n="8"/>ergo relinquitur, quod sit de opinandis :
<lb ed="#Be" n="9"/>sed in talibus non culpatur oppositum
<lb ed="#Be" n="10"/>dicens : ergo ista opinio non est
condem<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="11"/>nanda, ut videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e295">
<lb ed="#Be" n="12"/>SED CONTRA :
<lb ed="#Be" n="13"/>1. Quidquid dissolvit ordinem
Eccle<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="14"/>siasticum et potestatem Ecclesiasticam,
<lb ed="#Be" n="15"/>illud est hereticum : haec assertio
dissol<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="16"/>vit: ergo est heretica. Progatio prime
<lb ed="#Be" n="17"/>est : quia hac est contra articulum, <quote xml:id="alalal-h51647-Qd1e310"> In
<lb ed="#Be" n="18"/>sanctam Ecclesiam et Sanctorum
com<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="19"/>munionem. </quote> Secunda probatur ex hoc,
<lb ed="#Be" n="20"/>quod qui negat actum, negat per
conse<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="21"/>quens potestatem : sed actus purgationis,
<lb ed="#Be" n="22"/>illuminationis, et perfectionis, negatur
<lb ed="#Be" n="23"/>procedere secundum ordinem potestatis
<lb ed="#Be" n="24"/>Ecclesiastice in reducendis inferioribus :
<lb ed="#Be" n="25"/>ergo constat propositum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e331">
<lb ed="#Be" n="26"/>2. Adhuc, Quod sacrw Scripture
con<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="27"/>tradicit est hereticum : sed illud sacre
<lb ed="#Be" n="28"/>Scripture contradicit : ergo est heresis
<lb ed="#Be" n="29"/>pura. Prima patet per se : quia non
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="30"/>bemus regulam credendi aliquam, nisi
<lb ed="#Be" n="31"/>Scripturam. Secunda constat : quia cum
<lb ed="#Be" n="32"/>mysterio sacra Scripture, quae in Veteri
<lb ed="#Be" n="33"/>Testamento dicit quod leprosus non
re<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="34"/>dit ad castra, nisi per judicium.
sacerdo<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="35"/>tis, contradicat ista assertio, constat
<lb ed="#Be" n="36"/>quod sacre Scripture contradicit : et ita
<lb ed="#Be" n="37"/>constat propositum probatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e360">
<lb ed="#Be" n="38"/>Responsio. Dicendum, quod
intelligi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="39"/>tur Littera sic : <quote xml:id="alalal-h51647-Qd1e366"> Quod voce pudor est
<lb ed="#Be" n="40"/>confiteri, </quote> hoc est, quod cum pudore
<lb ed="#Be" n="41"/>aliquis confitetur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e374">
<lb ed="#Be" n="42"/>AD opsecTUM autem contra, dicendum
<lb ed="#Be" n="43"/>quod Littera non tantum innuit, quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="44"/>non legit confessionem : sed etiam
ex<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="45"/>Presse dicit, quod non legit
satisfactio<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="46"/>nem : et tamen naturale jus non permit-
<cb ed="#Be" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="47"/>tit quin satisfecerit, si peccavit : et ita
<lb ed="#Be" n="48"/>etiam intelligendum est de confessione :
<lb ed="#Be" n="49"/>licet alibi duas solutiones alias super hoc
<lb ed="#Be" n="50"/>notaverimus in praecedentibus, quas hic
<lb ed="#Be" n="51"/>non repetimus, ne fiat prolixitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e400">
<lb ed="#Be" n="52"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod peccatum
<lb ed="#Be" n="53"/>quod defendi non potest, est peccatum in
<lb ed="#Be" n="54"/>judicio confessionis manifestatum
sacer<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="55"/>doti : quia tale est judicium illud, quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="56"/>accusantem absolvit, et defendentem
<lb ed="#Be" n="57"/>peccatum suum condemnat.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e416">
<lb ed="#Be" n="58"/>Ad objectum autem dicendum, quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="59"/>verum est de judicio convictionis, et de
<lb ed="#Be" n="60"/>judicio condemnationis, et non de
judi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="61"/>cio reconciliante reum : et bene
conce<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="62"/>do, quod non valet ad propositum pro
<lb ed="#Be" n="63"/>ista assertione : quia falsitas bonum au-.
<lb ed="#Be" n="64"/>ctoritatis testimonium habere non
pot<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="65"/>est; ,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e437">
<lb ed="#Be" n="66"/>Ad i quod ulterius queritur,
dicen<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="67"/>dum videtur, quod duplex est heresis,
<lb ed="#Be" n="68"/>scilicet aperta, et implicita. Aperta
here<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="69"/>sis, quae expresse contrarium predicat,
<lb ed="#Be" n="70"/>vel quod antecedit articulum, vel
sequi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="71"/>tur illum : ut quod Deus non sit trinus
<lb ed="#Be" n="72"/>et unus, est heresis contra articulum :
<lb ed="#Be" n="73"/>quod fornicatio non sit mortale
pecca<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="74"/>tum, est heresis contra consequens
arti<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="75"/>culum : quod sacra Scriptura falsum
di<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="76"/>cat, est heresis contra antecedens
articu<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="77"/>lum. Jmplicita autem heresis, est
asser<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="78"/>tio ex qua sequitur heresis, sicut est
<lb ed="#Be" n="79"/>ista : quia licet modo non teneamur
con<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="80"/>fiteri Episcopis tribus vel duobus, si
<lb ed="#Be" n="81"/>tamen precipiatur ab Ecclesia, tunc
te<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="82"/>nemur. Unde si ego dico non esse
con<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="83"/>fitendum Episcopis illis, ex hoc sequitur,
<lb ed="#Be" n="84"/>quod non sit obediendum potestati et
or<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="85"/>dinationi clavium : et ideo heresis est.
<lb ed="#Be" n="86"/>Et talem judico assertionem istam : quia
<lb ed="#Be" n="87"/>licet quandoque homo non confiteretur
<lb ed="#Be" n="88"/>homini enarrando peccatum ore, sicut
<lb ed="#Be" n="89"/>modo, tamen ex pracepto Ecclesiae
te<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="90"/>netur ad. illud. :
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e494">
<lb ed="#Be" n="91"/>Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod nec
<lb ed="#Be" n="92"/>Magister hic, nec <ref xml:id="alalal-h51647-Rd1e500">
<name xml:id="alalal-h51647-Nd1e502">Gratianus</name> in decreto</ref>
<pb ed="#Be" n="706"/>
<cb ed="#Be" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="1"/>recitat hoc approbando, sed potius
con<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="2"/>demnando, et errorem in oppositum
dis<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="3"/>putando manifestat.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e517">
<lb ed="#Be" n="4"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod ex illa
ra<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="5"/>tione non potest haberi, quod sit de
opi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="6"/>nabilibus, sed potius quod non omnino sit
<lb ed="#Be" n="7"/>morale, sed disciplinale secundum
ali<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="8"/>quid : sicut supra' per disputationem
<lb ed="#Be" n="9"/>habetur, quod substantialiter quidem
<lb ed="#Be" n="10"/>morale est, sed determinatio ipsius est
<lb ed="#Be" n="11"/>disciplinalis, et per Ecclesiam facta : et
<lb ed="#Be" n="12"/>hoc ad utilitatem hominum, et
Ecclesia<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="13"/>stice unitatis.tota die fieri potest.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e541">
<lb ed="#Be" n="14"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod licet
aucto<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="15"/>ritas canonis non sit de tota
determina<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="16"/>tione, tamen innuit canon hoc fieri posse,
<lb ed="#Be" n="17"/>et esse utile tam in Veteri quam in Novo
<lb ed="#Be" n="18"/>Testamento: in Veteri enim praecipit
<lb ed="#Be" n="19"/>diligenter agnosci vultum pecoris : in
<lb ed="#Be" n="20"/>Novo autem in canonica Jacobi expresse
<lb ed="#Be" n="21"/>dicens : Confitemini alterutrum peccata
<lb ed="#Be" n="22"/>vestra.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-h51647-d1e563">
<lb ed="#Be" n="23"/>Multa autem de modo illius praecepti
<lb ed="#Be" n="24"/>notata sunt supra : et ideo hic
transeun<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="25"/>dum,
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>