-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-i50429.xml
167 lines (167 loc) · 8.08 KB
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-i50429.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 11</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 11</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bf" n="cod-al7b30">Paris 1894, v. 30</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bf" n="239"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-i50429"><!-- l4d31a11 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-i50429-Hd1e99">Articulus 11</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-i50429-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Quid sit divortium ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e104">
<cb ed="#Bf" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="42"/>ARTICULUS XI.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="43"/>Quid sit divortium ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="44"/>Deinde quaeritur de hoc quod dicit,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="45"/>ibi, A, sub fine: <quote xml:id="alalal-i50429-Qd1e119"> In sacramento ut
<lb ed="#Bf" n="46"/>conjugium non separetur, etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e125">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="47"/>Queritur hic de divortio : et
quaerun<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="48"/>tur duo.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="49"/>Primum est de divortio propter
ma<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="50"/>trimonii impedimentum. Secundum
au<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="51"/>tem de separatione a thoro propter
for<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="52"/>nicationem,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="53"/>Circa primum autem queruntur tria,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="54"/>scilicet quid sit divortium ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="55"/>Secundum, Qui sunt qui possunt
de<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="56"/>nuntiare causas divortii?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="57"/>Tertium, Qualiter fiat divortium ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e152">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="58"/>Ab pRiIMuM proceditur sic :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="59"/>Dicunt Jurisperiti, quod <quote xml:id="alalal-i50429-Qd1e158"> divortium
<lb ed="#Bf" n="60"/>est separatio sacramentalis facta ob
le<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="61"/>gitimum impedimentum matrimonii : </quote>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="62"/>et haec diffinitio quasi trahitur hic de
<lb ed="#Bf" n="63"/>Littera, ubi Magister dividit
separatio<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="64"/>nem in corporalem, et sacramentalem,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="65"/>ut patet Litéeram inspicienti.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e175">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="66"/>Oxsyicirur autem contra hane
diffiniti<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="67"/>tionem : quia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="68"/>1. Sacramentaliter numquam
divi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="69"/>duntur, qui sacramentaliter numquam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="70"/>fuerunt conjuncti : sed habentes
legiti<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="71"/>mum impedimentum, numquam fuerunt
<lb ed="#Bf" n="72"/>sacramentaliter conjuncti : ergo videtur,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="73"/>quod numquam sacramentaliter
dividun<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="74"/>tur: ergo diffinitio nulla est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e197">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="75"/>2. Item, Cum dicitur, Sepuratio
sa<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="76"/>cramentalis : aut intelligitur de
sacra<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="77"/>mento matrimonii, aut de sacramento
<lb ed="#Bf" n="78"/>quod est bonum matrimoni. Si dicitur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="79"/>primum : tunc idem est separatio
sacra<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="80"/>mentalis, quod separatio matrimonialis :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="81"/>sed ibi sunt opposita : quia
matrimo<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="82"/>niale est conjunctum in individuam vite
<pb ed="#Bf" n="240"/>
<cb ed="#Bf" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="1"/>consuetudinem : ergo cum dicitur
sepa<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="2"/>ratio sacramentalis, ibi est oppositio in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="3"/>adjecto : sicut si dicam, divisio
indivisi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="4"/>bilis. Si autem dicatur a sacramento
<lb ed="#Bf" n="5"/>quod bonum est matrimonii : tunc hoc
<lb ed="#Bf" n="6"/>magis sequitur, quia illud est
indivisibi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="7"/>litas ipsa.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e236">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="8"/>3. Item, In nulla natura vel scientia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="9"/>unum oppositum denominat suum
op<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="10"/>positum, numquam enim dicitur
indivi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="11"/>sibile divisibile, et album congregans
<lb ed="#Bf" n="12"/>visum, vel aliquid hujusmodi : ergo nec
<lb ed="#Bf" n="13"/>hic unum oppositorum denominat
alte<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="14"/>rum: sed separatio opposita est
sacra<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="15"/>mento : ergo non potest dici separatio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="16"/>sacramentalis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e258">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="17"/>4, Ad idem objicitur per hoc quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="18"/>habetur in Littera : quia in Littera
dici<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="19"/>tur, quod ad sacramentum pertinet,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="20"/>quod matrimonium non separetur : et ex
<lb ed="#Bf" n="21"/>hoe objicitur ut prius.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e271">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="22"/>Responsio. Dicendum, quod haec
diffi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="23"/>nitio posset esse melior : tamen sustineri
<lb ed="#Bf" n="24"/>potest.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e281">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="25"/>Et tunc dicendum ad primum, quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="26"/>separatio sacramentalis dicitur separatio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="27"/>vineuli sacramenti non ejus quod fuit,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="28"/>sed ejus quod videbatur esse antequam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="29"/>probaretur impedimentum: unde si
<lb ed="#Bf" n="30"/>etiam diffinitio sic corrigatur, ut
dica<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="31"/>tur : <quote xml:id="alalal-i50429-Qd1e298"> Divortium est separatio corum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="32"/>qui conjuncti sacramentaliter
videban<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="33"/>tur, ob legitimum impedimentum quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="34"/>impedit matrimonium contrahendum, et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="35"/>dirimit contractum : </quote> credo, quod
me<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="36"/>lior esset diffinitio.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i50429-d1e312">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="37"/>Et per hoc patet solutio ad totum.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>