-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-i68502.xml
252 lines (252 loc) · 12.4 KB
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-i68502.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 1</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 1</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bf" n="cod-al7b30">Paris 1894, v. 30</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bf" n="326"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-i68502"><!-- l4d34a1 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-i68502-Hd1e99">Articulus 1</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e101">
<pb ed="#Bf" n="326"/>
<cb ed="#Bf" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="1"/>ARTICULUS I.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e110">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="2"/>Quid sit legitimitas personarum
contra<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="3"/>hentium ? et, Qua lege dicitur
legiti<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="4"/>mum ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e119">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="5"/>Ad primtM objicitur sic :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="6"/>Dicit Magister in Littera, quod
legiti<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="7"/>mx persona sunt, quibus non obviat
<lb ed="#Bf" n="8"/>aliquod impedimentum matrimonil: ergo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="9"/>legitimitas ipsa est immunitas ab
impedi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="10"/>mentis matrimonil.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e135">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="11"/>Videtur autem, quod male diffiniatur :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="12"/>1. Diffinitio enim datur per
essentia<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="13"/>lia : sed negaliones nulli sunt essentiales :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="14"/>ergo non debet dari per negationem :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="15"/>sed datur per negationem : ergo videtur,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="16"/>quod non yaleat.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e152">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="17"/>2. Hem, Diffinientia sunt essentialia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="18"/>rei predicata : sed ila numquam de re
<lb ed="#Bf" n="19"/>negari possunt : ergo nulla diffinitio
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="20"/>stituitur ex negatis de re: ergo ut prius.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e163">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="21"/>Urens quaeritur magis tangendo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="22"/>rem, A qua lege persona dicatur
legiti<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="23"/>me ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e172">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="24"/>Aut enim a lege universaliter accepta,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="25"/>vel particulariter. Si universaliler,
opor<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="26"/>tet quod legitima persona sit secundum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="27"/>omnem legem legitima: hoc autem
fal<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="28"/>sum est, quia est legitima, quando est
<lb ed="#Bf" n="29"/>secundum unaim legem iantum, sicut
su<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="30"/>pra dixit Nicolaus Papa, quod ad
matri<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="31"/>monium sufliciat'secundum legem corum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="32"/>qui contrahunt, consensus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e194">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="33"/>Si autem dicatur a particulari lege
le<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="34"/>gitima. Contra: Aut enim est legis
na<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="35"/>ture, aul Moysi, aai Christi: et
quod<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="36"/>cumque dicatur, patet quod non est
ve<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="37"/>ruin, quia noa omnis persona ab illa lege
<lb ed="#Bf" n="38"/>est legitima.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e210">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="39"/>Ulterius quaeritur de divisione quam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="40"/>dat Magister, quod alique fuerunt
legiti<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="41"/>mie ante legem, etc.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e219">
<cb ed="#Bf" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="42"/>Videtur enim hoc non esse verum :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="43"/>1. Matrimonium enim est de
morali<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="44"/>bus : ergo uno modo se habuit in lege,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="45"/>et ante legem, et post, sicut catera
mo<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="46"/>ralia.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e236">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="47"/>2. Item, Video quod exdem medicina
<lb ed="#Bf" n="48"/>corporales exhibentur infirmis ex eadem
<lb ed="#Bf" n="49"/>causa in qualibet lege: ergo cum
matri<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="50"/>monium sit medicina infirmitatis, ex
ea<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="51"/>dem causa ab initio mundi eisdem legibus
<lb ed="#Bf" n="52"/>matrimonium debuit omnibus dari : ergo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="53"/>non erant alie persone legitima
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="54"/>dum temporum diversitatem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e256">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="55"/>3. Item, Objicitur de alia divisione,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="56"/>qua dicit, quod quaedam plene sunt
legi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="57"/>time, etc. Si enim legitimitas diffinitur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="58"/>per negationem et privationem, ut dicil
<lb ed="#Bf" n="59"/>in Litfera, et negationes et privationes
<lb ed="#Bf" n="60"/>non suscipiunt plus et minus, sive magis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="61"/>et minus, videtur quod omnes sint vel
<lb ed="#Bf" n="62"/>equaliter legitima vel aequaliter
illegiti<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="63"/>mo: ergo nihil est quod dicit in Litlera,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e278">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="64"/>4. Item, In aliis operibus non dicitur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="65"/>legaliter justus, nisi qui in omni lege
<lb ed="#Bf" n="66"/>concordat : et si discordat in quodam, et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="67"/>concordat in quodam, ipse simpliciter
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="68"/>citur legaliter injustus, sicut dicit
Aristo<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="69"/>telesin IV Lthicorwmn. Fur enim in
quo<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="70"/>dam concordat legibus, quia forte castus
<lb ed="#Bf" n="71"/>est: et tamen suspenditur, quia legaliter
<lb ed="#Bf" n="72"/>est injustus contrectando rem alienam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="73"/>invito domino : ergo videtur, quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="74"/>etiam in hoc casu quae non omnibus
le<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="75"/>gibus concordat, est illegitima persona:
<lb ed="#Bf" n="76"/>ergo nulla debet dici medie legitima, vel
<lb ed="#Bf" n="77"/>simpliciter illegitima: ergo sua divisio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="78"/>nulla esse videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e313">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="79"/>Responsio. Dicendum, quod Magister
<lb ed="#Bf" n="80"/>dat descriptionem legitimarum
persona<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="81"/>rum per consequentem ex affirmatione
<lb ed="#Bf" n="82"/>negationem, eo quod notior est nobis ex
<lb ed="#Bf" n="83"/>his quae negat, et ipse principalius
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="84"/>tendit bene intelligi, quam bene diffinire.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="85"/>Diflinitio tamen logitime persone est,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="86"/>que secundum leges libertatem habet
<lb ed="#Bf" n="87"/>contrahendi matrimonium cum
quocum<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="88"/>que voluerit. Et ex ista sequitur negalio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="89"/>quam Magister ponit in Littera; quia
<pb ed="#Bf" n="327"/>
<cb ed="#Bf" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="1"/>levitima est, cui non obviat
impedimen<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="2"/>tum, etc.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e348">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="3"/>Et per hoc patet solutio ad duo prima.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e353">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="4"/>Ad id quod ulterius queritur,
dicen<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="5"/>dum quod a lege quae est de personis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="6"/>matrimonium contrahentibus secundum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="7"/>quod abstrahit a lege nature et Moysi et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="8"/>Christi, dicuntur legitime persone.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e367">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="9"/>Ad id autem quod objicitur primo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="10"/>contra hoc, dicendum quod non valet:
<lb ed="#Bf" n="11"/>quia ista lex est universalis, non
univer<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="12"/>saliter sumpta: et hoc est in genere
<lb ed="#Bf" n="13"/>sumptum quod verificatur secundum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="14"/>quamlibet speciem dividendo : et cum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="15"/>legum species varientur ex temporibus
<lb ed="#Bf" n="16"/>et statibus diversis, ideo bene dicit
Magi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="17"/>ster, quod aliae fuerunt legitime ante et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="18"/>post legem Moysi: et per hoc etiam
pa<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="19"/>tet solutioad sequens.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e393">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="20"/>Ad id quod ulterius queritur,
dicen<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="21"/>dum quod matrimonium licet sit de
mo<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="22"/>ralibus secundum suam substantiam,
ta<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="23"/>men modus contrahendi est judicialis : et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="24"/>ideo variatur secundum leges
contrahen<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="25"/>tium, ut dicit Nicolaus Papa.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e409">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="26"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod morbus non
<lb ed="#Bf" n="27"/>erat similis nisi concupiscentia: sed
<lb ed="#Bf" n="28"/>morbi alii multi variabantur secundum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="29"/>tempora, sicut paucitas hominum, et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="30"/>paucitas mulierum et virorum, et unius
<lb ed="#Bf" n="31"/>et ejusdem cultus, et paucitas
extranea<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="32"/>rum; et ideo lex dabat sororem,
cogna<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="33"/>tam, extraneam, secundum temporis
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="34"/>versitatem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e431">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="35"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod est privatio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="36"/>consequens ex quadam affirmatione
pre<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="37"/>ecdente : et ideo non valet argumenta-
<cb ed="#Bf" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="38"/>tio. Aliter potest dici, quod negatio et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="39"/>privatio dupliciter considerantur, in se,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="40"/>et in sua causa. In se non recipiunt
ma<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="41"/>gis et minus. In causa variantur secun~
<lb ed="#Bf" n="42"/>dum causae variationem. Unde cum
fal<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="43"/>sum sit privatio, non dicit Aristoteles,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="44"/>quod magis mentitur qui dicit quinque
<lb ed="#Bf" n="45"/>esse centum, quam ille qui dicit quinque
<lb ed="#Bf" n="46"/>esse Sex.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i68502-d1e462">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="47"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod non dicit
le<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="48"/>gitimum medie, quia medie concordat
<lb ed="#Bf" n="49"/>legibus, sicut innuit objectio: sed quia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="50"/>facile ad legem reduci potest : unde patet,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="51"/>quod non est simile, quod pro simili
<lb ed="#Bf" n="52"/>fuit inductum.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>