-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-i73571.xml
201 lines (201 loc) · 9.71 KB
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-i73571.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 7</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 7</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bf" n="cod-al7b30">Paris 1894, v. 30</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bf" n="353"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-i73571"><!-- l4d35a7 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-i73571-Hd1e99">Articulus 7</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-i73571-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Qualiter debeat fieri adulterii
accusatio ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e104">
<pb ed="#Bf" n="353"/>
<cb ed="#Bf" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="1"/>ARTICULUS VII.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="2"/>Qualiter debeat fieri adulterii
accu<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="3"/>satio ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e117">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="4"/>Deinde quaeritur de hoc quod dicit,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="5"/>ibi, E, <quote xml:id="alalal-i73571-Qd1e123"> Sed haec omnia intelligenda
<lb ed="#Bf" n="6"/>sunt, etc. </quote> Et queruntur hic nonem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e129">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="7"/>Primum est, Qualiter debeat fieri
ac<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="8"/>cusatio ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="9"/>Secundum, Quando maritus
admitti<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="10"/>tur ad accusationem uxoris adultere,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="11"/>vel e converso ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="12"/>Tertium, Quis sit effectus ejus
separa<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="13"/>tionis ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="14"/>Quartum, In quibus casibus vir non
<lb ed="#Bf" n="15"/>potest agere ad thori separationem ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="16"/>Quintum, Utrum post latam
senten<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="17"/>liam de separatione thori recipere
te<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="18"/>netur adulteram si et ipse adulteratur ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="19"/>Sextum, Utrum mulier post latam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="20"/>sententiam debet reconciliari viro
revo<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="21"/>canti eam, etiamsi non vult ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="22"/>Septimum, Utrum mulier adultera
<lb ed="#Bf" n="23"/>post peenitentiam adulterii potest
repel<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="24"/>lere virum ab accusatione?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="25"/>Octavum, Utrum vir adulteratus
oc<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="26"/>culte potest sine peccato agere contra
<lb ed="#Bf" n="27"/>mulierem manifeste adulteram ad thori
<lb ed="#Bf" n="28"/>separationem ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="29"/>Nonum, Utrum reconciliata adultera
<lb ed="#Bf" n="30"/>debitum quod habuit in corpore viri
<lb ed="#Bf" n="31"/>amiserit, ita quod non possit sine
<lb ed="#Bf" n="32"/>peccato petere debitum, sed tantum
red<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="33"/>dere ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e191">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="34"/>Ad primum objicitur sic :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="35"/>Accusatio est proprie de crimine per
<lb ed="#Bf" n="36"/>inscriptionem facta, obligante se
accusa<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="37"/>tore ad legem talionis coram judice si
<lb ed="#Bf" n="38"/>defecerit in probatione.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e204">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="39"/>Videtur autem,quod hoc non possit
ob<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="40"/>servari in accusatione adulterii: quia
<cb ed="#Bf" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="41"/>1. Accusatio debet esse de scito : illud
<lb ed="#Bf" n="42"/>autem peccatum in occulto fit. Ergo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="43"/>non potest accusari.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e220">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="44"/>2. Si dicas, quod per suspicionem
de<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="45"/>bet accusari. Contra : Sepe humanum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="46"/>fallitur judicium : ergo suspicio non facit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="47"/>ad certitudinem judicii : ergo nec judex
<lb ed="#Bf" n="48"/>procedet ad sententiam diffinitivam.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e233">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="49"/>3. Item, Qualiter facienda est
inscrip<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="50"/>tic? Non enim postest intelligi inscribi
<lb ed="#Bf" n="51"/>id quod est probandum : actus autem
<lb ed="#Bf" n="52"/>commixtionis probari non potest, quia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="53"/>rarissime accidit coram tot fieri illud
<lb ed="#Bf" n="54"/>peccatum, quod sufficiant ad
probatio<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="55"/>nem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e251">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="56"/>4. Item, Videtur non posse salvari,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="57"/>quod se obliget ad legem talionis : quia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="58"/>si detur, quod non probat, tunc ipse
se<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="59"/>parabitur a conjuge, quia hoc tantum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="60"/>est ac si uxor separetur ab eo: ergo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="61"/>ipse sive probaret sive non probaret,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="62"/>consequeretur propositum suum : et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="63"/>hoc non est jus: ergo non potest fieri
<lb ed="#Bf" n="64"/>modus accusationis in ista causa.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e273">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="65"/>Responsio. Dicendum, quod accusatio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="66"/>matrimonii propter adulterium
manife<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="67"/>stum duplex est : una ad poenam
lega<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="68"/>lem, altera ad thori separationem. Illa
<lb ed="#Bf" n="69"/>vero quae est ad poenam legalem, fit
co<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="70"/>ram judice seculari per inscriptionem et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="71"/>penam talionis : quia tunc eadem peena
<lb ed="#Bf" n="72"/>debet fieri viro siin probatione defecerit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="73"/>que fieret mulieri si probare posset quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="74"/>dicit. Illa autem quae fit ad thori
sepa<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="75"/>rationem, fit per inscriptionem coram
<lb ed="#Bf" n="76"/>judice ecclesiastico et sine lege talionis :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="77"/>quia non habet locum lex talionis : quia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="78"/>sicut objectum est, vir consequeretur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="79"/>propositum, sive probaret quod objicit,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="80"/>sive non.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e311">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="81"/>Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod
judi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="82"/>catur scitum secundum quod violenter
<lb ed="#Bf" n="83"/>est presumptum ad minus secundum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="84"/>rhetorem, qui ex signis violentis
proce<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="85"/>dit, ut si solum cum sola in lecto vel in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="86"/>tenebris latitantem inveniat. Quandoque
<lb ed="#Bf" n="87"/>eliam tam viri quam mulieres quando
<lb ed="#Bf" n="88"/>sciunt adulteras, insidiantur eis, et cum
<pb ed="#Bf" n="354"/>
<cb ed="#Bf" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="1"/>vestibus deprehendunt in facto, et tune
<lb ed="#Bf" n="2"/>judici de facto constare potest.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e340">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="3"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod suspicio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="4"/>dicitur levis et violenta, secundum quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="5"/>etiam in dialecticis quandoque signum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="6"/>profundatum invenitur, quod quasi cum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="7"/>causa convertilur, et hoc quandoque
fa<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="8"/>cit scienliam quasi demonstrativarn sicut
<lb ed="#Bf" n="9"/>causa, et talis est presumptio in rheto~
<lb ed="#Bf" n="10"/>ricis, eb hoc bene facit lidem judici :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="11"/>levis autem non debet adinilli.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e362">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="12"/>Ao atiup dicendum, quod mscriptio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="13"/>facienda est sic: <quote xml:id="alalal-i73571-Qd1e368"> Anno ab incarnatione
<lb ed="#Bf" n="14"/>Domini nostri Josue Christi MCCOXLIX,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="15"/>presidente Domino N. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i73571-d1e376">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="16"/>Ad aliud dicendum ut patet in
prin<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="17"/>cipio soliutionis.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>