-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-i95539.xml
199 lines (199 loc) · 9.8 KB
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-i95539.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 7</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 7</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bf" n="cod-al7b30">Paris 1894, v. 30</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bf" n="461"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-i95539"><!-- l4d41a7 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-i95539-Hd1e99">Articulus 7</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-i95539-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An diffinitio justitiae publice honestatis
sit bene data a Magistro ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="18"/>ARTICULUS VII.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="19"/>An diffinitio justitiae publice honestatis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="20"/>sit bene data a Magistro ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="21"/>Deinde quaeritur de hoc quod dicit,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="22"/>ibi, B, post medium: <quote xml:id="alalal-i95539-Qd1e119"> Sed nec alterius
<lb ed="#Bf" n="23"/>conjunctionis scboles, etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e125">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="24"/>Licet illud sit abrogatum per jura nova
<lb ed="#Bf" n="25"/>quod hic dicit de sobole alterius
conjun<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="26"/>ctionis, tamen gratia hujus queremus de
<lb ed="#Bf" n="27"/>publica honestatis justitia, de qua
que<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="28"/>remus tria, scilicet quid sit ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="29"/>Et, Utrum habeat gradus, vel non ?
<lb ed="#Bf" n="30"/>Tertio, Quid sit juris de ipsa ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e144">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="31"/>Av primum dicunt communiter, quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="32"/>publica honestatis justitia est
propinqui<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="33"/>tas ex sponsalibus proveniens, robur
tra<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="34"/>bens ab Ecclesiae institutione propter
<lb ed="#Bf" n="35"/>ejus honestatem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e157">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="36"/>Videtur autem contra hoc objici: quia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="37"/>1. Sponsalia non faciunt unionem
ma<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="38"/>trimonii vel carnis: ergo cum omnis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="39"/>propinquitas exeat ab aliquo uno, videtur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="40"/>quod nulla propinguitas derivetur ex
<lb ed="#Bf" n="41"/>sponsalibus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e173">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="42"/>2. Item, In naturis sic est, quod ex
<lb ed="#Bf" n="43"/>hoc quod aliqua materia fuit inclinata
<lb ed="#Bf" n="44"/>tantum ad recipiendam formam unam,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="45"/>ex hoc non impeditur quin possit jungi
<lb ed="#Bf" n="46"/>alii, et illi vicine citius quam remote :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="47"/>cum igitur foeemina se habeat ad
mascu<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="48"/>lum sicut materia ad formam, videtur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="49"/>quod ex sponsalibus qua sunt inclinatio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="50"/>vel dispositio ad matrimonium, nihil
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="51"/>ducatur unde ista feemina magis
prohi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="52"/>beatur a consanguineo sponsi sui, quam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="53"/>ab altero: ergo videtur, quod nulla sit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="54"/>talis propinquitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e204">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="55"/>3. Ulterius quaeritur hic de hoc quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="56"/>dicit, Robur trahens ab Ecclesia institu -
<lb ed="#Bf" n="57"/>tione, Non enim debet institutum
Eccle<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="58"/>siae esse irrationabile : ergo fundatur
su<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="59"/>per aliquid rationis: et quaeratur, Quid
<lb ed="#Bf" n="60"/>est illud, et non invenitur, neque in
ve<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="61"/>teri lege, neque in nova, nec etiam in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="62"/>lege civili: ergo videtur, quod potius sit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="63"/>dicendum, publice honestatis injustitia,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="64"/>quam justitia.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e228">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="65"/>4. Item quare dicit, Propler ejus
ho<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="66"/>nestatem ? Nulla enim honestas videtur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="67"/>in hoc Kecclesie generari, sed potius
<lb ed="#Bf" n="68"/>inextricabiles laquei multi ex hoc
procu<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="69"/>rantur animabus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e241">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="70"/>5. Item, Cum istud pertineat potius ad
<lb ed="#Bf" n="71"/>continentiam, quam ad justitiam, potius
<lb ed="#Bf" n="72"/>deberet dici: Publice honestatis
pudici<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="73"/>tia vel continentia, quam public
hone<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="74"/>statis justitia.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e255">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="75"/>Responsio. Dicendum, quod satis
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="76"/>veniens est dicta diffinitio, et tangit
ge<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="77"/>nus, etcausam, et confirmans, et finem :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="78"/>et hoce patent per ordinem in diffinitione.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e266">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="79"/>Av primum ergo objeetum dicendum,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="80"/>quod est ibi unio quadam, sicul supra in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="81"/>questione de sponsalibus dictum est: et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="82"/>ideo contrahitur ibi vinculum quoddam.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="83"/>Et quia etiam Ecclesia per se diligit
hone<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="84"/>statem castitatis, de facili recipit
occasio<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="85"/>nem non contrahendi matrimonium cum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="86"/>persona aliqua vel aliquibus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e286">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="87"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod sponsalia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="88"/>sunt sicut dispositiones propinque ad
<lb ed="#Bf" n="89"/>matrimonium : unde sicut materia ha-
<pb ed="#Bf" n="462"/>
<cb ed="#Bf" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="1"/>bens dispositionem propinquam ad
for<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="2"/>mam aliquam, non unitur alteri nisi
<lb ed="#Bf" n="3"/>prius in ea fiat corruptio dispositionis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="4"/>prioris : ita etiam non potest persona
<lb ed="#Bf" n="5"/>desponsata, cum alia contrahere, nisi
<lb ed="#Bf" n="6"/>prius corruptis sponsalibus, quae non sine
<lb ed="#Bf" n="7"/>peccato sive causa corrumpuntur, quia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="8"/>faciunt quoddam vinculum unionis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e317">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="9"/>Ad i quod ullerius queritur,
dicen<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="10"/>dum quod Keclesia semper satis habet
<lb ed="#Bf" n="11"/>rationis ordinans vincula amoris et
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="12"/>pinquitatis: et hoc habet argumentum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="13"/>Leviticus, xvin, 6 et seq., ubi dicitur,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="14"/>quod turpitudo unius propinquorum,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="15"/>turpiludo alterius est: et ideo non est
<lb ed="#Bf" n="16"/>discoopericnda : et ila hic desponsata
<lb ed="#Bf" n="17"/>quodammodo cefficitur adjecta
consan<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="18"/>guinitati : et ideo nullus de
consanguini<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="19"/>tate illa potest illam habere,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e343">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="20"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod non est
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="21"/>justitia : quia Deo placet ut
confoederen<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="22"/>tur homines et confirmentur per
affinita<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="23"/>tes quascumque.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-i95539-d1e354">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="24"/>Ad wirmum dicendum, quod omnis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="25"/>virtutis opus secundum quod. lege
ordi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="26"/>natur, est opus justilia quam legalem
<lb ed="#Bf" n="27"/>vocat Aristoteles. Et quia istud non
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="28"/>bet robur, nisi a lege ecclesia, ideo
po<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="29"/>tius dicitur: Public honestatis justitia,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="30"/>quam pudicitia,
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>