-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-j03994.xml
355 lines (355 loc) · 18.5 KB
/
cod-al7b30_alalal-j03994.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 2</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 2</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bf" n="cod-al7b30">Paris 1894, v. 30</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bf" n="503"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-j03994"><!-- l4d43a2 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-j03994-Hd1e99">Articulus 2</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-j03994-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Quid sit resurrectio ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="25"/>ARTICULUS II.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="26"/>Quid sit resurrectio ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e111">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="27"/>Secundo queritur, Quid sit
resurre<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="28"/>ctio ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e118">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="29"/>Dicit autem Augustinus super
Gene<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="30"/>sim ad litteram : <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e124"> Resurrectio nihil
<lb ed="#Bf" n="31"/>aliud est nisi restitulio in consimilem
<lb ed="#Bf" n="32"/>vitam *.</quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e133">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="33"/>Damascenus autem in libro de Fide
<lb ed="#Bf" n="34"/>orthodoxa : <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e139"> Resurrectio est secunda
<lb ed="#Bf" n="35"/>ejus quod cecidit surrectio. </quote> Et parum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="36"/>post : <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e146"> Resurrectio est rursus copulatio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="37"/>anime et corporis : et secunda cjus quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="38"/>dissolutum est et cecidit, animalis
sur<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="39"/>rectio. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e156">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="40"/>Contra primam autem objicitur sic :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="41"/>1. Consimilis vita: aut est similis vite
<lb ed="#Bf" n="42"/>ante peccatum secundum statum
inno<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="43"/>centiv, aut similis isti secundum statum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="44"/>pene et culpe. Si primo modo : ergo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="45"/>illa vita cibis egebit et commixtione
<lb ed="#Bf" n="46"/>sexus, quod est contra Dominum in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="47"/>Evangelio dicentem, quod <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e175">in
resurre<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="48"/>ctione neque nubent, neque nubentur</quote>,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="49"/>etc., Si secundo modo : ergo erit vita
<lb ed="#Bf" n="50"/>futura in poenis famis, sitis, et
hujus<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="51"/>modi, quod absurdum est : ergo
re<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="52"/>surrectio non est restitutio in consimilem
<lb ed="#Bf" n="53"/>vitam.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e192">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="54"/>2. Item, Augustinus super Genesim
<lb ed="#Bf" n="55"/>dicit sic : <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e198"> Reditum ad id quod
senti<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="56"/>mus, resurgere appellamus, </quote> Sed jam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="57"/>sentimus labores et miserias, et ante
<lb ed="#Bf" n="58"/>peccatum animalem vitam sensimus.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="59"/>Ergo reditus per resurrectionem erit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="60"/>ad talem : ergo nulla resurrectio erit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="61"/>gloriosa.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e215">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="62"/>3. Item <ref xml:id="alalal-j03994-Rd1e219">Augustinus in libro IV de
<lb ed="#Bf" n="63"/>Trinitate</ref> ; <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e224"
source="http://scta.info/resource/adt-l8-d1e980@111-120">Resurgere nihil aliud est,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="64"/>quam reviviscere, et a morte ad vitam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="65"/>redire.</quote> Et ex hoc sequitur idem quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="66"/>prius.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e234">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="67"/>Ex omnibus autem his concluditur,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="68"/>cum tam in primo statu quam in
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="69"/>do fuerit vita cum potentia moriendi,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="70"/>quod in resurrectione futura sit potentia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="71"/>moriendi, quod falsum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e247">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="72"/>Ossicrron autem de illa quae est
Da<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="73"/>mascent, quia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="74"/>1. Secunda resurrectio non est, nisi
pri<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="75"/>ma precesserit : sed primo numquam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="76"/>surrexit corpus hominis antequam sit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="77"/>dies judicii : ergo nec tunc secundo
sur<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="78"/>get: ergo male dicit, secunda
resurre<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="79"/>ctio.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e268">
<pb ed="#Bf" n="504"/>
<cb ed="#Bf" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="1"/>2. Item, Secunda non nolat nurnerum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="2"/>et ordinem, nisi actuum ejusdem
ratio<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="3"/>nis: sed elevatio corporis hominis ad
<lb ed="#Bf" n="4"/>hance vitam, et elevatio sua ad formam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="5"/>glorie, non sunt ejusdem rationis : ergo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="6"/>non secundo tunc surget corpus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e288">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="7"/>3. Item, Secundum <ref xml:id="alalal-j03994-Rd1e292">Philosophum in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="8"/>VI Topicorum</ref> : <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e297"> St aliquod commune
<lb ed="#Bf" n="9"/>invenitur in diffinitione et diffinito, illud
<lb ed="#Bf" n="10"/>nec est pars diflinitionis, nec diffiniti : </quote>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="11"/>sed surrectio communiter invenitur in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="12"/>diffinitione, et diffinito ergo pars
<lb ed="#Bf" n="13"/>neutrius est : ergo totum quod. dicit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="14"/>Damascenus in utraque suarum
diffi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="15"/>nitionum non explanat, nisi
habitudi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="16"/>nem prepositionis qua est in
composi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="17"/>to, cum dicitur resurrectio.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e320">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="18"/>Item, Objicitur de secunda, quia quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="19"/>dissolutum est, videtur idem dicere cum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="20"/>eo quod cecidit : ergo videtur diffinitio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="21"/>nugatoriam habere repetitionem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e331">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="22"/>4, Ttem, Diffinitio resurrectionis omni
<lb ed="#Bf" n="23"/>resurrectioni debet convenire : sed hee
<lb ed="#Bf" n="24"/>diffinitio non convenil resurrectioni
Do<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="25"/>mini, quia non est dissolutum corpus
<lb ed="#Bf" n="26"/>jus : ergo non est generalis, nec bona,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="27"/>ut videtur. Quod autem non conveniat
<lb ed="#Bf" n="28"/>resurrectioni Domini, patet per hoc
<lb ed="#Bf" n="29"/>quod dicit Damascenus !: <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e350"> ®G0a¢, id est,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="30"/>corruptionis nomen duo significat :
si<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="31"/>gnilicat enim hujusmodi passiones,
fa<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="32"/>mem, sitim, laborem, clavorum
perfo<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="33"/>rationem, mortem, id est, separationem
<lb ed="#Bf" n="34"/>anime a corpore, et quecumque talia.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="35"/>Secundum hoc significatum etigov, id
<lb ed="#Bf" n="36"/>est, corruptibile corpus Domini dicimus.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="37"/>Omnia enim haec yoluntarie assumpsit.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="38"/>Significat etiam ¢0éez, id est,
corrup<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="39"/>tio, perfectam corporis in ea (ex quibus
<lb ed="#Bf" n="40"/>compositum est) elementa,
dissolutio<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="41"/>nem et destructionem, quae magis a
<lb ed="#Bf" n="42"/>multis corruptio dicitur et nominatur.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="43"/>Hujus experimentum corpus Domini
<lb ed="#Bf" n="44"/>non habuit, ut ait Propheta David :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="45"/>Quoniam non derelingues animam meam
<cb ed="#Bf" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="46"/>in inferno, nec dabis sanctum tuam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="47"/>videre diapodpay, id est, corruptionem. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e395">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="48"/>5. Item, Objicitur de hoc quod dicit,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="49"/>animalis. Potius enim debuit dicere,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="50"/>hominis, quam animalis quia quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="51"/>resurget, habet ab co quod est homo,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="52"/>et non ab eo quod est animal.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e408">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="53"/>G. Item, Secundum omnes istas
diffi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="54"/>nitiones non resurget homo, sed tantum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="55"/>corpus, ut videtur : cum tamen
resurge<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="56"/>re sit proprius actus hominis, et non
<lb ed="#Bf" n="57"/>partis hominis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e422">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="58"/>Contra quod videtur dicere
Dama<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="59"/>scenus, sic: <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e428">Animales mortales
existen<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="60"/>tes qualiter resurgent. </quote> Jt infra
pa<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="61"/>run :<quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e435"> Ipsum corpus quod corrumpitur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="62"/>et dissolvitur, idem resurget*. </quote> Ergo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="63"/>videtur, quod hominis non sit
resurge<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="64"/>re, sed tantum corporis, quod non est
<lb ed="#Bf" n="65"/>homo.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e448">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="66"/>7. Item, Videtur contrarium debere
<lb ed="#Bf" n="67"/>dicere : quia actio potius est agentis,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="68"/>quam patientis : sed anima aget
resur<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="69"/>reclionem perficiendo et movendo
cor<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="70"/>pus: ergo anima potius resurget, quam
<lb ed="#Bf" n="71"/>corpus :etita male dicit et diffinit
Da<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="72"/>mascenus resurrectionem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e466">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="73"/>Sorutio. Dicendum, quod omnes iste
<lb ed="#Bf" n="74"/>diffinitiones satis bona sunt : sed omnia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="75"/>verba Augustinus loquens de
resurre<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="76"/>ctione, communiter et non stricte accepit.
<lb ed="#Bf" n="77"/>Et ad intelligendum hoc, sciendum quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="78"/>resurrectio dupliciter dicitur, scilicet
<lb ed="#Bf" n="79"/>communiter, et proprie. Communiter
<lb ed="#Bf" n="80"/>sumpta resurrectio continet sub se
rela<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="81"/>tionem ad slatum gloriw, et ad statum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="82"/>vite animalis, sicut dicimus Lazarum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="83"/>resurrexisse : et hoc modo non
quwri<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="84"/>mus diffinitionem ejus hic. Proprie
<lb ed="#Bf" n="85"/>sumitur, prout dividit cum suscitatione
<lb ed="#Bf" n="86"/>hoc commune quod est restitui ad
yi<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="87"/>tam exstinctam : et sic non competit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="88"/>resurrections, nisi ad yilam
inexstingui<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="89"/>bilem, sive sit in poenis, sive in gloria.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e505">
<pb ed="#Bf" n="505"/>
<cb ed="#Bf" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="1"/>Ad id ergo quod primo objicitur,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="2"/>dicendum quod si volumus concedere
<lb ed="#Bf" n="3"/>de resurrectione stricte sumpta loqui
<lb ed="#Bf" n="4"/>Augustinum, quod consimilis vita dicitur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="5"/>in specie et veritate humana vite, licet
<lb ed="#Bf" n="6"/>differat ab hac et illa quae fuit in statu
<lb ed="#Bf" n="7"/>Innocenti, in statu et proprietate.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e527">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="8"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod sentire in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="9"/>verbo Augustini ponitur pro experiri
<lb ed="#Bf" n="10"/>quoad substantialia vite humane : quia
<lb ed="#Bf" n="11"/>eadem etiam experiemur in
resurre<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="12"/>ctione : quia aliter non resurgeremus
<lb ed="#Bf" n="13"/>et non dicitur sentire pati eadem? per
<lb ed="#Bf" n="14"/>sensus qua modo patimur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e545">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="15"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod non est
<lb ed="#Bf" n="16"/>reditus de morte ad vitam perfecte, nisi
<lb ed="#Bf" n="17"/>perfecte vita vincat mortem : et hoc non
<lb ed="#Bf" n="18"/>est nisi quando omnis causa mortis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="19"/>naturalis excludetur, quae est pugna
<lb ed="#Bf" n="20"/>contrariorum : et hoc modo non erit
<lb ed="#Bf" n="21"/>resurrectio, nisi post cursum mundi in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="22"/>fine temporum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e566">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="23"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod due sunt
<lb ed="#Bf" n="24"/>elevationes corporalis materie. Una ad
<lb ed="#Bf" n="25"/>formam quae est anima rationalis : et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="26"/>hee fit in generatione. Et alia ejusdem
<lb ed="#Bf" n="27"/>ad animam indissolubiliter reunitam :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="28"/>et haec dicitur regeneratio. Matth. x1x,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="29"/>28 : <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e583">In regeneratione, cum sederit Filius
<lb ed="#Bf" n="30"/>hominis</quote>, etc. Et ideo falsum est, quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="31"/>non sunt ibi duae surrectiones
cor<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="32"/>poris.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e593">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="33"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod non
opor<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="34"/>tet, quod ea quorum ly secundum notat
<lb ed="#Bf" n="35"/>iterationem, sint ejusdem accidentis,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="36"/>sed tantum, quod sint ejusdem rationis :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="37"/>sicut quando secundo bibo, non oportet
<lb ed="#Bf" n="38"/>quod secundus potus sit similis primo
<lb ed="#Bf" n="39"/>in accidente. Et ita est de duplici vita
<lb ed="#Bf" n="40"/>ad quam surgit corpus, quod est
ejus<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="41"/>dem specici, et non ejusdem
acciden<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="42"/>tis,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e617">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="43"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod id quod
<lb ed="#Bf" n="44"/>dicit Aristoteles intelligitur de his quae
<lb ed="#Bf" n="45"/>eodem modo sumuntur in diffinitione
<lb ed="#Bf" n="46"/>et diffinito : sicut si dicerem, homo
al<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="47"/>bus est animal rationale album. Sed non
<lb ed="#Bf" n="48"/>est sic : cum enim dicitur resurrectio,
<cb ed="#Bf" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bf" n="49"/>surrectio dicit habitudinem corporis ad
<lb ed="#Bf" n="50"/>animam recipiendam, et iterationem
<lb ed="#Bf" n="51"/>surrectionis notat prepositio : sed in
<lb ed="#Bf" n="52"/>diffinitione notat terminum motus
re<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="53"/>surrectionis : quia resurrectio motus est,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="54"/>et per duos terminos diffinitur, quorum
<lb ed="#Bf" n="55"/>unus est casus et dissolutio : alins autem
<lb ed="#Bf" n="56"/>altitudo immortalis vite in bonis et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="57"/>malis communiter : et illa importatur
<lb ed="#Bf" n="58"/>per ly surrectio positum in diffinitione :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="59"/>quia componitur a sursum, et erigo : co
<lb ed="#Bf" n="60"/>quod sic sit figure decomposite.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e661">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="61"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod illa
diffini<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="62"/>tio non convenit resurrectioni Domini :
<lb ed="#Bf" n="63"/>et ipse dat aliam in eodem capite quae
<lb ed="#Bf" n="64"/>resurrectioni Domini convenit, sic
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="65"/>cens: <quote xml:id="alalal-j03994-Qd1e674"> Domini resurrectio est corporis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="66"/>sancti et incorrupti et anime unio. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e680">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="67"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod animalis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="68"/>est ibi adjectivum, et est genitivus ejus
<lb ed="#Bf" n="69"/>quod dicitur hic et haec animalis, et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="70"/>hoe animale : et dicit conditionem
cor<lb break="no" ed="#Bf" n="71"/>poris cadentis in mortem, et est sensus,
<lb ed="#Bf" n="72"/>animalis, id est, animaliter viventis
<lb ed="#Bf" n="73"/>corporis, quod cecidit per mortem, et
<lb ed="#Bf" n="74"/>dissolutum est per incinerationem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e700">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="75"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod resurrectio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="76"/>est hominis secundum corpus : et hoc
<lb ed="#Bf" n="77"/>intendit dicere Damascenus, et non
<lb ed="#Bf" n="78"/>aliud.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-j03994-d1e712">
<lb ed="#Bf" n="79"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod resurrectio
<lb ed="#Bf" n="80"/>non dicitur hic tamquam moventis, sed
<lb ed="#Bf" n="81"/>tamquam ejus cujus est actus surgendi
<lb ed="#Bf" n="82"/>sive moti in actu illo : et ideo proprie
<lb ed="#Bf" n="83"/>convenit homini secundum corpus, non
<lb ed="#Bf" n="84"/>autem secundum animam.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>