-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e1161.xml
177 lines (177 loc) · 11 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e1161.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 3</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 3</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="55-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161"><!-- l1d19q3 -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-Hd1e101">Quaestio 3</head>
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Utrum in divinis personis sit circuminsesio hoc est utrum una persona divina sit in alia</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e106">
<lb ed="#L" n="69"/>QUAEATIO TERTIA.
<lb ed="#L" n="70"/>Vtrum in diuinis sit
circumin<lb ed="#L" n="71" break="no"/>sessio.
<lb ed="#L" n="72"/>Thom. 1. 4. 42. ar. 5
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e117">
<lb ed="#L" n="73"/>DEINDE quaeritur, vtrum in diuinis sit circum
<lb ed="#L" n="74"/>insessio. Voco autem circuminsessionem quod
<lb ed="#L" n="75"/>vna persona sit in alia. Etvidetur quod non
qui<lb ed="#L" n="76" break="no"/>si pater esset in filio & filius in patre sequeretur
<lb ed="#L" n="77"/>quod pater sit in seipso, consequens est falsum,
<lb ed="#L" n="78"/>antecedens, probatio consequentiae, quia si sortes est
<!--00175.xml-->
<cb ed="#L" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#L" n="79"/>similis platoni & plato est similis martino, sequitur quod
sor<lb ed="#L" n="80" break="no"/>tes est similis martino, & eodem modo est in proposito vt
vi<lb ed="#L" n="81" break="no"/>detur, falsitas consequentiae apparet: quia nihil potest esse in
<lb ed="#L" n="82"/>scipso vt habetur 4. Physicorum.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e146">
<lb ed="#L" n="83"/>
<!--2.--> Item Arist. 4. Physicorum assignat modos essendi in, sed
se<lb ed="#L" n="84" break="no"/>cundum nullum eorum vna persona potest esse in alia, vt
pa<lb ed="#L" n="85" break="no"/>tet discurrendo per singulos, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e158">
<lb ed="#L" n="86"/>
<!--3--> IN CONTRARIVM est, quod dicitur Io. 14. Ege
<lb ed="#L" n="87"/>in patre & pater in me est.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e167">
<lb ed="#L" n="88"/>
<!--4--> RESPONSIO. Dicendum est quod in diuinis est
cir<lb ed="#L" n="89" break="no"/>cuminsessio, quia pater est in filio & filius in patre, & quaelibe
<lb ed="#L" n="90"/>persona in alia: qualiter autem hoc sit, sciendum est quod vna
per<lb ed="#L" n="91" break="no"/>sona non potest esse in alia ratione totius constituri ex essentia
<lb ed="#L" n="92"/>& relatione ita quod quaelibet sit continens & contenta ratione te
<lb ed="#L" n="93"/>tius, potest tame ratione alterius partis, nec fiat vis in nomine
<lb ed="#L" n="94"/>totius & partis, quia sic oportet loqui, licet in diuinis non sit
<lb ed="#L" n="95"/>proprie totum & pars. Primum patet sic, esse in alio & in quo
<lb ed="#L" n="96"/>aliud, opponuntur secundum proprias rationes, sicut esse ab
<lb ed="#L" n="97"/>alio & a quo aliud, sed nihil vnum & idem secundum idem &
<lb ed="#L" n="98"/>respectu eiusdem est ab alio, & a quo aliud, ergo nihil vnum &
<lb ed="#L" n="99"/>idem respectu eiusdem & secundum idem est quod in alio &
<lb ed="#L" n="100"/>in quo aliud, sed istud sequeretur si pater esset in filio &
ccon<lb ed="#L" n="101" break="no"/>uerso quilibet ratione totius constituti, quare &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e202">
<lb ed="#L" n="102"/>
<!--5--> Secundum patet scilicet quod vna persona potest esie i
<lb ed="#L" n="103"/>alia ratione partis nisi quod praeintelligendum est quod secundum
no<lb ed="#L" n="104" break="no"/>strum modum intelligendi diuina persona est constituta quasi
<lb ed="#L" n="105"/>ex duabus partibus, scilicet ex essentia & relatione, vna auten
<lb ed="#L" n="106"/>persona non proprie dicitur esse in alia ratione relationis, lice
<lb ed="#L" n="107"/>per eam sit de intellectu alterius, quia vt ad quem & vt in que
<lb ed="#L" n="108"/>sunt diuersae habitudines, sed habitudo personae ad personam
<lb ed="#L" n="109"/>secundum relationes est habitudo vt ad quem tantum; erg
<lb ed="#L" n="110"/>ratione relationis vna persona non est in alia.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e226">
<lb ed="#L" n="111"/>
<!--6--> Item illud per quod vna persona distinguitur ab alia non
<lb ed="#L" n="112"/>est ratio quare vna sit in alia, quia illud per quod vna est in alia
<lb ed="#L" n="113"/>est commune vtrique: & est in vtraque, alioquin non esset
ra<lb ed="#L" n="114" break="no"/>tio quare vna persona esset in alia, sed relationes quibus
per<lb ed="#L" n="115" break="no"/>sonae distinguuntur non sunt communes personis, ergo
secun<lb ed="#L" n="116" break="no"/>dum eas vna non dicitur esse in alia.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e244">
<lb ed="#L" n="117"/>
<!--7--> Restat ergo quod vna persona sit in alia ratione essentiae qui
<lb ed="#L" n="118"/>vna est numero in omnibus personis. Sed persona non est vt in
<lb ed="#L" n="119"/>qua est alia ratione solius essentiae, quia tunc per ide
conueni<lb ed="#L" n="120" break="no"/>ret personae esse in alio & in quo aliud, quod reprobatum est, sed
<lb ed="#L" n="121"/>conuenit personae vt in ipsa sit alia, ratione totius constituti,
<lb ed="#L" n="122"/>sicut filio conuenit ratione essentiae quod sit in patre, sed patri con
<lb ed="#L" n="123"/>uenit vt sit in quo filius ratione totius constituti, & similite
<lb ed="#L" n="124"/>in aliis. Et hoc videtur rationabile, illud enim in quo est aliud
<lb ed="#L" n="125"/>debet excedere vel esse in plus, quam illud quod est in ipso, sec
<lb ed="#L" n="126"/>pater ratione totius constituti se habet aliquo modo in plus,
<lb ed="#L" n="127"/>filius ratione solius essentiae, & similiter econuerso: quare &c
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e273">
<lb ed="#L" n="128"/>
<!--8--> AD PRIMVM argumentum cum dicitur si pater est
<lb ed="#L" n="129"/>in filio & filius in patre &c. Dicendum quod consequentia non te
<lb ed="#L" n="130"/>net quia inesse est proprietas distincti, eiusdem autem ad
seip<lb ed="#L" n="131" break="no"/>sum non est distinctio. Et ideo procedendo in rectum bene
te<lb ed="#L" n="132" break="no"/>net consequentia non reflectendo sicut in exemplo quod
ad<lb ed="#L" n="133" break="no"/>ducitur, si sortes est similis platoni, & plato martino, bene
se<lb ed="#L" n="134" break="no"/>quitur quod sortes sit similis martino, reflectendo autem non
<lb ed="#L" n="135"/>tenet consequentia, quia reflexio tollit distinctionem, vnde no
<lb ed="#L" n="136"/>sequitur, sortes est similis platoni, & plato similis sorti, ergo so
<lb ed="#L" n="137"/>tes est similis sibiipsi. Eodem modo sequitur in proposito,
spi<lb ed="#L" n="138" break="no"/>ritus sanctus est in filio & filius est in patre, ergo suirit? fanctu
<lb ed="#L" n="139"/>est in patre, non tamen sequitur reflectendo, pater est in filio 8
<lb ed="#L" n="140"/>filius in patre: ergo pater est in seipso. Vel dicendum quod forte
se<lb ed="#L" n="141" break="no"/>queretur si quaelibet persona esset in alia ratione totius consti
<lb ed="#L" n="142"/>tuti & esset in qua alia ratione eiusdem, sed non est ita, vt vi
<lb ed="#L" n="143"/>sum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1161-d1e313">
<lb ed="#L" n="144"/>
<!--9--> Ad secundum dicendum quod non omnes modi essendi in
<lb ed="#L" n="145"/>aliquo continentur in illis quos ponit Aristoteles quarto Phy
<lb ed="#L" n="146"/>sicorum nisi forte per quandam remotam reductionem, sicut
<lb ed="#L" n="147"/>esse in tempore reducitur ad illum modum quo aliquid in
lo<lb ed="#L" n="148" break="no"/>co est. quia vterque est sicut mensuratum in mensura. & eodem
<lb ed="#L" n="149"/>modo potest hic inueniri aliqua reductio, pater enim est in
fi<lb ed="#L" n="150" break="no"/>lio ratione essentiae, essentia autem est in filio modo quo
natu<lb ed="#L" n="151" break="no"/>ra communis est in supposito, reducitur ad modum quo genu:
<lb ed="#L" n="152"/>est in specie, vel species in indiuiduo, licet essentia non habea
<lb ed="#L" n="153"/>proprie rationem generis vel speciei respectu personarum vt
<lb ed="#L" n="154"/>postea patebit.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>