-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e1367.xml
129 lines (129 loc) · 7.25 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e1367.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 2</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 2</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="63-v"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1367"><!-- l1d25q2 -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1367-Hd1e101">Quaestio 2</head>
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1367-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Utrum persona sit aliquid commune in divinis</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1367-d1e106">
<!--00192.xml-->
<pb ed="#L" n="63-v"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#L" n="1"/>TIO SECVNDA.
<lb ed="#L" n="2"/>Vtrum persona sit aliquid commune
<lb ed="#L" n="3"/>in diuinis.
<lb ed="#L" n="4"/>Thom. l. 4. 30. artic. 4.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1367-d1e124">
<lb ed="#L" n="5"/>SECVNDO quaeritur, vtrum persona sit aliquid
<lb ed="#L" n="6"/>commune in diuinis. Et videtur quod non, quia
<lb ed="#L" n="7"/>illud quod de ratione sua est incommunicabile
<lb ed="#L" n="8"/>non potest esse commune, sed de ratione
per<lb ed="#L" n="9" break="no"/>sonae est esse incommunicabile, vt patet ex eius
<lb ed="#L" n="10"/>diffinitione, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1367-d1e140">
<lb ed="#L" n="11"/>
<!--2--> IN CONTRARIVM est quod dicit beatus
Au<lb ed="#L" n="12" break="no"/>gustinus, & habetur in litera.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1367-d1e150">
<lb ed="#L" n="13"/>
<!--3--> RESPONSIO. Aliquid dicitur commune dupliciter,
<lb ed="#L" n="14"/>vno modo secundum rem quando eadem res secundum esse reale
<lb ed="#L" n="15"/>est in pluribus, & hoc modo sola essentia diuina est in diuinis
<lb ed="#L" n="16"/>communis tribus personis, & spiratio actiua est communis patri &
<lb ed="#L" n="17"/>filio. Et hoc modo persona non est aliquid commune, aut quia non
<lb ed="#L" n="18"/>dicit rem sed intensionem, vt quidam ponunt, aut quia si dica
<lb ed="#L" n="19"/>rem, non dicit tamen vnam rem secundum numerum tantum, sec
<lb ed="#L" n="20"/>sicut indiuiduum vagum vt alij dicunt. Alio modo dicitur aliquid
<lb ed="#L" n="21"/>commune secundum rationem eo modo quo vniuersale est com
<lb ed="#L" n="22"/>mune ad singularia sub ipso contenta, & hoc modo persona est
<lb ed="#L" n="23"/>aliquid commune in diuinis, & non solum persona, sed relatio,
<lb ed="#L" n="24"/>vtrumque enim dicitur de pluribus non secundum aliquid vnum nu
<lb ed="#L" n="25"/>mero repertum in ipsis, sed sicut vniuersale de sub ipso contentis
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1367-d1e183">
<lb ed="#L" n="26"/>
<!--4--> Ad argumentum dicendum qued res incommunicabilis
<lb ed="#L" n="27"/>non potest esse communis, sed intentio incommunicabilitatis
<lb ed="#L" n="28"/>bene potest esse communis, sicut dato quod sortes non fit
com<lb ed="#L" n="29" break="no"/>municabilis, tamen intentio indiuidui vel suppositi est pluribus
<lb ed="#L" n="30"/>communis, persona autem non significat rem
incommunica<lb ed="#L" n="31" break="no"/>bilem, sed intentionem incommunicabilitatis. Et ideo pluribus
<lb ed="#L" n="32"/>potest esse communis.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1367-d1e203">
<lb ed="#L" n="33"/>Vtrum autem tres personae possint dici tres res. Notandum
<lb ed="#L" n="34"/>quod ens & res idem penitus important & de quibuscunque vnum
<lb ed="#L" n="35"/>praedicatur & alterum, conuertuntur enim in suppositis. & idec
<lb ed="#L" n="36"/>quot modis dicitur vnum & alterum. Ens autem dicitur de sub.
<lb ed="#L" n="37"/>stantia & reliquis praedicamentis, per attributionem tamen ad
<lb ed="#L" n="38"/>substantiam quae est primum & per se ens. Et eodem modo
dici<lb ed="#L" n="39" break="no"/>tur res. Ens etiam per se sumptu sine determinatione (quantum
<lb ed="#L" n="40"/>est de communi vsu loquentium) sumitur tantum pro ente per
<lb ed="#L" n="41"/>se, id est pro substantia, licet forte de virtute sermonis esset sem
<lb ed="#L" n="42"/>per distinguendum. Pro aliis autem stat secundum conditioni
<lb ed="#L" n="43"/>determinationis adiunctae. Et idem est de nomine rei. Cum igi
<lb ed="#L" n="44"/>tur quaeritur, vtrum tres personae possint dici tres res, dicendi
<lb ed="#L" n="45"/>quod secundum communem modum loquendi non debet di
<lb ed="#L" n="46"/>ci quod sunt tres res, ne intelligantur esse tres substantiae De
vir<lb ed="#L" n="47" break="no"/>tute autem sermonis esset distinguenda propositio, quia si
ac<lb ed="#L" n="48" break="no"/>cipiatur res pro substantia, falsa esset. Si pro relatione vel
ha<lb ed="#L" n="49" break="no"/>bente relatione, vera. Cum additione tamen semper
conce<lb ed="#L" n="50" break="no"/>dendum tres personas esse tres res relatiuas.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>