-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e1608.xml
139 lines (139 loc) · 7.86 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e1608.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 2</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 2</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="75-v"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="b"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608"><!-- l1d32q2 -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-Hd1e101">Quaestio 2</head>
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Utrum Filius sit sapiens sapientia genita</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-d1e106">
<lb ed="#L" n="115"/>QVAESTIO SECVNDA.
<lb ed="#L" n="116"/>Vtrum filius sit sapiens sapientia genita.
<lb ed="#L" n="117"/>Thom. 1. q. 41. art. 3. ad quariumis
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-d1e115">
<lb ed="#L" n="118"/>SECVNDO quaeritur vtrum filius sit sapiens
sa<lb ed="#L" n="119" break="no"/>pientia genita. Et videtur quod non, quia eadem
<lb ed="#L" n="120"/>est sapientia patris & filij, sed sapientia patris non
<lb ed="#L" n="121"/>est genita quia pater nihil habet genitum, ergo
<lb ed="#L" n="122"/>nec sapientia filij est genita.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-d1e128">
<lb ed="#L" n="123"/>
<!--2.--> Item nihil essentiale in diuinis est genitum, sed sapientia est
<lb ed="#L" n="124"/>aliquid essentiale, ergo non est genita, quare filius non potest
<lb ed="#L" n="125"/>esse sapiens sapientia genita.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-d1e140">
<lb ed="#L" n="126"/>
<!--2--> IN. CONTRARIVM est, quia filius est sapiens per
<lb ed="#L" n="127"/>se: sed ipse est sapientia genita: quare &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-d1e149">
<lb ed="#L" n="128"/>
<!--4.--> Item Hilarius dicit, & habitum fuit prius in litera distin. 5.
<lb ed="#L" n="129"/>quod filius nihil habet nisi genitum vel natum, sed filius habet sa
<lb ed="#L" n="130"/>pientiam qua dicitur sapiens, ergo ipsa est genita vel nata.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-d1e160">
<lb ed="#L" n="131"/>
<!--5--> RESPONSIO. Dicitur hic communiter & bene, quod
<lb ed="#L" n="132"/>iste ablatiuus notat quandam habitudinem, potest ergo nota
<lb ed="#L" n="133"/>re habitudinem principij efficientis, & sic est falsa, quia nihil
ge<lb ed="#L" n="134" break="no"/>nitum efficit sapientiam in filio, & in eodem sensu posset
con<lb ed="#L" n="135" break="no"/>cedi quod filius est sapiens sapientia ingenita, quia filius habei
<lb ed="#L" n="136"/>a patie quod sit sapiens, pater autem dicitur sapientia
ingeni<lb ed="#L" n="137" break="no"/>ta, sicut filius dicitur sapientia genita: vel potest ablatiuus
no<lb ed="#L" n="138" break="no"/>tare habitudinem principij formalis, sicut corpus dicitur
colo<lb ed="#L" n="139" break="no"/>ratum albedine: & sic adhuc ista est falsa filius est sapiens
sapien<lb ed="#L" n="140" break="no"/>tia genita, quia sapientia per quam filius est formaliter sapiens,
<lb ed="#L" n="141"/>est sapientia essentialis quae non est genita, licet sit per
genera<lb ed="#L" n="142" break="no"/>tionem communicata, quia genitum proprie est illud quod pe
<lb ed="#L" n="143"/>generationem producitur. Et sub hoc sensu posset adhuc concedi
<lb ed="#L" n="144"/>quod filius sit sapiens sapientia ingenita, quia ingenitum aliquo
<lb ed="#L" n="145"/>modo potest conuenire essentiae, & iste modus loquendi magis
<lb ed="#L" n="146"/>accedit ad proprietatem quam primus. Alio modo potest
abla<lb ed="#L" n="147" break="no"/>tiuus dicere habitudinem causae subiectiuae seu materialis sicut
<lb ed="#L" n="148"/>dicimus quod corpus est coloratum superficie, vel superficies est
<lb ed="#L" n="149"/>colorata seipsa, licet autem in diuinis non sit proprie subiectum
<lb ed="#L" n="150"/>vel materia, tamen ponimus ibi personam, vel hypostasim, qua
<lb ed="#L" n="151"/>secundum nostrum modum intelligendi se habet quasi subiectiue
<lb ed="#L" n="152"/>ad ea quae sibi attribuuntur, & sic licet videatur aliquibus quod
<lb ed="#L" n="153"/>haec possit concedi, filius est sapiens sapientia genita, id est,
se<lb ed="#L" n="154" break="no"/>ipso qui est sapientia genita, tamen est valde impropria, tun
<lb ed="#L" n="155"/>quia filius non est sapientia genita proprie, licet sit sapientia, &
<lb ed="#L" n="156"/>sic genitus, quia non conuenit ei esse genitum secundum quod
<lb ed="#L" n="157"/>est sapientia, tum quia ly sapientia genita videtur esse
determi<lb ed="#L" n="158" break="no"/>natio praedicati, & non conditio subiecti vt in isto sensu dicitur.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-d1e225">
<lb ed="#L" n="159"/>
<!--6--> SIC tamen procedit primum argu. ad primam partem.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-d1e232">
<lb ed="#L" n="160"/>
<!--7.--> Ad aliud dicendum quod filius nihil habet nisi genitum, id est
<lb ed="#L" n="161"/>quod non acceperit per generationem, & non quod essentia, vel
<!--00217.xml-->
<pb ed="#L" n="76-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#L" n="1"/>essentialia sint genita, sed solum per generationem communicata
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e1608-d1e250">
<lb ed="#L" n="2"/>
<!--8--> Alia argumenta bene probant quod formali praedicatione
hae<lb ed="#L" n="3" break="no"/>est falsa, filius est sapiens sapientia genita, quod concedo.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>