-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e2981.xml
167 lines (167 loc) · 10 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e2981.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 3</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 3</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="134-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981"><!-- l2d14q3 -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-Hd1e101">Quaestio 3</head>
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Utrum stellae moveantur solum motu suae spherae</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e106">
<lb ed="#L" n="58"/>QVAESTIO TERTIA.
<lb ed="#L" n="59"/>Vtrum stellae moueantur motu solum suae
<lb ed="#L" n="60"/>spherae, vel praeter illum habeant
<lb ed="#L" n="61"/>proprium motum.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e117">
<lb ed="#L" n="62"/>ERTIO quaeritur, vtrum stellae moueantu
<lb ed="#L" n="63"/>solum motu spherae, an praeter illum habeant
<lb ed="#L" n="64"/>proprium motum. Et videtur quod non habeam
<lb ed="#L" n="65"/>proprium motum, quia coelum est ingenerabile
<lb ed="#L" n="66"/>& incorruptibile, ita indiuisibile, cum diuisio sit
<lb ed="#L" n="67"/>via ad corruptionem, sed si stellae mouerentur motu proprio
<lb ed="#L" n="68"/>eylum diuideretur, quia non seruarent in coelo eundem
si<lb ed="#L" n="69" break="no"/>tum, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e137">
<lb ed="#L" n="70"/>
<!--2.--> Item motus coeli est circularis, sed si stellae haberent motum
<lb ed="#L" n="71"/>proprium, ille non esset circularis, igitur &c. Minor probatur,
<lb ed="#L" n="72"/>quia quod mouetur circulariter, non mutat locum, stellae autem
<lb ed="#L" n="73"/>si haberent motum proprium ex toto mutarent locum, ideo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e151">
<lb ed="#L" n="74"/>
<!--3--> IN CONTRARIVM est Ptolomae & alij astrologi
<lb ed="#L" n="75"/>RESPONSIO. Stellarum quaedam sunt in octaua
<lb ed="#L" n="76"/>sphera, quae dicuntur fixae. Aliae vero sunt in inferioribus
sphe<lb ed="#L" n="77" break="no"/>ris, & dicuntur planetae, nec sunt plures in eadem sphera.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e164">
<lb ed="#L" n="78"/>
<!--5--> DE PRIMIS dicendum quod mouentur solum motu
<!--00335.xml-->
<cb ed="#L" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#L" n="79"/>octauae spherae, quia frustra ponerentur plures motus vbi
suffi<lb ed="#L" n="80" break="no"/>cit vnus, sed omnia apparenta circa stellas fixas optime saluan
<lb ed="#L" n="81"/>tur ponendo eas moueri solum motu octauae spherae, quia stel
<lb ed="#L" n="82"/>lae fixae semper seruant eandem elongationem &
approxima<lb ed="#L" n="83" break="no"/>tionem ad inuicem, quod optime saluatur ponendo quod
so<lb ed="#L" n="84" break="no"/>lum moueantur spherae suae, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e188">
<lb ed="#L" n="85"/>
<!--6--> DE PLANETIS autem quanquam dicat idem Arist.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e195">
<lb ed="#L" n="86"/>
<!--2.--> coel. & mundi. Tamen verius dicunt astrologi ponendo ipso
<lb ed="#L" n="87"/>moueri secundum ecentricos & epiciclos. Et de encentrici
<lb ed="#L" n="88"/>apparet quod stella quae mouetur solum motu spherae non po
<lb ed="#L" n="89"/>test quandoque magis quandoque minus ad terram appropin
<lb ed="#L" n="90"/>quare quia omnes spherae sunt concentricae sed planetae,
quan<lb ed="#L" n="91" break="no"/>doque appropinquant ad terram magis vno tempore quam
<lb ed="#L" n="92"/>alio (vt patet per experimenta astrologica) quare &c. propter
<lb ed="#L" n="93"/>quod coacti, sunt astrologi ponere motum planetarum in
cir<lb ed="#L" n="94" break="no"/>culis ecentricis quorum pars vna maxime remouetur a terra
<lb ed="#L" n="95"/>& dicitur aux, siue eleuatio. Altera vero maxime accedit ad
<lb ed="#L" n="96"/>terram, & dicitur oppositum augis.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e224">
<lb ed="#L" n="97"/>
<!--7--> Similiter patet de epiciclis, quia si planetae mouerentur
so<lb ed="#L" n="98" break="no"/>lum motu spherarum, cum spherae planetarum moueantur ab
<lb ed="#L" n="99"/>occidente in orientem, tunc si planeta aliqua nocte esset ex
di<lb ed="#L" n="100" break="no"/>rectione alicuius stellae fixae sequenti nocte deberet ipsam
an<lb ed="#L" n="101" break="no"/>tecedere versus orientem. Videmus autem multis planetis
con<lb ed="#L" n="102" break="no"/>trarium quandoque, retrocedunt enim versus occidentem,
er<lb ed="#L" n="103" break="no"/>go praeter motum spherarum oportet in eis ponere motum
<lb ed="#L" n="104"/>retrogradationis quod fit in epiciclis in quibus planeta est
re<lb ed="#L" n="105" break="no"/>trogradus stationarius vel directus.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e248">
<lb ed="#L" n="106"/>S AD PRIMVM argumentum dicendum quod non
opor<lb ed="#L" n="107" break="no"/>tet coelum diuidi ponendo proprium motum planetarum in
<lb ed="#L" n="108"/>ecentricis & epiciclis habendo bonam imaginationem eorum.
<lb ed="#L" n="109"/>Ponitur enim ecentricus circulus intra duas superficies
sphe<lb ed="#L" n="110" break="no"/>rae existens cuius vna medietas magis accedit ad superficiem
<lb ed="#L" n="111"/>spherae concauam. Altera vero ad conuexam, & mouetur hic
<lb ed="#L" n="112"/>circulus intra spheram cum sit spherae contiguus & non
con<lb ed="#L" n="113" break="no"/>tinuus, & motu eius mouetur planeta tanquam pars eius
exi<lb ed="#L" n="114" break="no"/>stens, planeta dico habens ecentricum sine epiciclo sicut est
<lb ed="#L" n="115"/>sol, si vero habeat epiciclum cum ecentrico tunc epiciclus
po<lb ed="#L" n="116" break="no"/>neretur moueri in ecentrico per modum quo ponitur
ecen<lb ed="#L" n="117" break="no"/>tricus moueri in sphera, epiciclus est enim corpus sphericum
<lb ed="#L" n="118"/>infra ecentricum contactum & non continuum, & ideo potest
<lb ed="#L" n="119"/>in ecentrico habere suum motum proprium sphericum cuius
<lb ed="#L" n="120"/>epicicli pars est planeta, & hoc ponendo non oportet coelum
<lb ed="#L" n="121"/>diuidi. Sed & si diuideretur non sequeretur quod esset
corru<lb ed="#L" n="122" break="no"/>ptibile, quia diuisio non est in via ad corruptionem nisi
quate<lb ed="#L" n="123" break="no"/>nus pars diuisa non sic potest resistere contrario agenti sicut
<lb ed="#L" n="124"/>coniuncta toti. Co lum autem non habet contrarium propter
<lb ed="#L" n="125"/>quod nec continuum, neque diuisum corrumperetur.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e2981-d1e295">
<lb ed="#L" n="126"/>
<!--9--> Ad secundum dicendum quod motus coeli non est
natura<lb ed="#L" n="127" break="no"/>lis vt ostensum est in praecedente quaestione, & ideo nihil
pro<lb ed="#L" n="128" break="no"/>hibet planetam moueri alio motu quam circulari, neque tamen
<lb ed="#L" n="129"/>erit contra naturam, sed solum praeter naturam. Et tamen
po<lb ed="#L" n="130" break="no"/>nendo planetas solum moueri motu suorum ecentricorum &
<lb ed="#L" n="131"/>epiciclorum nullus inuenitur motus in eis nisi circularis, quia
<lb ed="#L" n="132"/>ecentricus mouetur circulariter similiter & epiciclus, secus
au<lb ed="#L" n="133" break="no"/>tem esset si planeta secundum se proprium motum haberet,
<lb ed="#L" n="134"/>tunc enim motus eius non esset circularis licet esset in circulo.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>