-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e3046.xml
125 lines (125 loc) · 7.66 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e3046.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Praeambulum</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Praeambulum</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="136-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3046"><!-- l2d16prae -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3046-Hd1e101">Praeambulum</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3046-d1e103">
<lb ed="#L" n="14"/>Sententia huius distinctionis xvj. in
<lb ed="#L" n="15"/>generali & speciali.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3046-d1e110">
<lb ed="#L" n="16"/>IS EXCVRSIS, scilicet de hominis forma
<lb ed="#L" n="17"/>tione. Superius determinauit de creatura pure
<lb ed="#L" n="18"/>spirituali, & de creatura pure corporali. Hic
<lb ed="#L" n="19"/>vero determinat de creatura media, scilicet de
<lb ed="#L" n="20"/>homine. Et diuiditur in duas. Primo
determi<lb ed="#L" n="21" break="no"/>nat de homine, quantum ad sui propriam institutionem.
Se<lb ed="#L" n="22" break="no"/>cundo quantum ad eius lapsum dicens, videns igitur diabolus
<lb ed="#L" n="23"/>hominem. Prima in duas. Primo determinat conditionis
hu<lb ed="#L" n="24" break="no"/>manae principium. Secundo ostendit hominis conditi statum,
<lb ed="#L" n="25"/>distinctione decimanona. Prima diuiditur in duas. Primo enin
<lb ed="#L" n="26"/>in generali proponens hominis productionem, ostendit ipsun
<lb ed="#L" n="27"/>esse creaturam ad Dei imaginem. Secundo magis in special
<lb ed="#L" n="28"/>principio decimaeseptimae distinctionis ibi, hic de origine
ani<lb ed="#L" n="29" break="no"/>mae. Prima est principium lectionis. Et diuiditur in duas.
Pri<lb ed="#L" n="30" break="no"/>mo enim ostendit hominem ad imaginem Dei esse creatum.
<lb ed="#L" n="31"/>Secundo determinat secundum quam partem sui ad
imagi<lb ed="#L" n="32" break="no"/>nem Dei sit creatus. Secunda ibi, factus est ergo homo
secun<lb ed="#L" n="33" break="no"/>dum imaginem Dei. Prima diuiditur in quatuor. Primo
pro<lb ed="#L" n="34" break="no"/>ponit suum intentum. Secundo ostendit quod proposuerat
<lb ed="#L" n="35"/>Tertio excludit quorundam opinionem. Quarto addit
quan<lb ed="#L" n="36" break="no"/>dam declarationem suae expositionis. Secunda ibi, imago
au<lb ed="#L" n="37" break="no"/>tem & similitudo. Tertia ibi, filius vero proprie. Quarta ibi
<lb ed="#L" n="38"/>veruntamen hic de. Secunda pars principalis, factus est
erg<lb ed="#L" n="39" break="no"/>homo secundum animam, vbi determinat, secundum quam
<lb ed="#L" n="40"/>partem homo sit ad imaginem Dei creatus, diuiditur in duas
<lb ed="#L" n="41"/>Primo ostendit hominem esse formatum ad imaginem diuini
<lb ed="#L" n="42"/>tatis, non solius patris & filij. Secundo ostendit quomodo
dif<lb ed="#L" n="43" break="no"/>ferenter imago hominis etiam filio conueniat. Secunda ibi
<lb ed="#L" n="44"/>quocirca homo. Haec est diuisio lectionis in generali.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3046-d1e175">
<lb ed="#L" n="45"/>
<!--2--> IN SPECIALI sic procedit, & proponitur prime
<lb ed="#L" n="46"/>in generali, quae intendit de creato homine, proponit erge
<lb ed="#L" n="47"/>qualis creatus sit homo. Et respondet quod ad imaginem Dei
<lb ed="#L" n="48"/>sicut habetur in Gen. faciamus hominem, &c. In quibus verbi
<lb ed="#L" n="49"/>ostenditur vnitas essentiae, & trinitas personarum. Postea dici
<lb ed="#L" n="50"/>quod illud potest accipi pro imagine increata, quae est iden
<lb ed="#L" n="51"/>quod diuina essentia, in qua personae sibi assimilantur, vel pro
<lb ed="#L" n="52"/>creatura, in qua factus est homo. Et secundum quam Deo
as<lb ed="#L" n="53" break="no"/>similatur. Sed quia imago relationem importat ad illud
cu<lb ed="#L" n="54" break="no"/>ius est imago, & ad cuius similitudinem facta est, ideo
essen<lb ed="#L" n="55" break="no"/>tia non proprie imago dicitur. Postea dicit quod aliqui cre
<lb ed="#L" n="56"/>diderunt quod filius est imago, homo vero non est imago, sed
<lb ed="#L" n="57"/>ad imaginem: hanc opinionem reprobat per Apostolum. Ali
<lb ed="#L" n="58"/>vero dixerunt quod filius est imago, sed spiritus sanctus
dici<lb ed="#L" n="59" break="no"/>tur similitudo homo vero fit ad imaginem & similitudinem
<lb ed="#L" n="60"/>Et hanc opinionem etiam non approbat. Postea dicit quod
<lb ed="#L" n="61"/>homo factus est ad imaginem secundum naturalia, ad
simili<lb ed="#L" n="62" break="no"/>tudinem vero quantum ad virtutes theologicas, vel ad
ima<lb ed="#L" n="63" break="no"/>ginem; quantum ad cognitionem, ad similitudinem,
quan<lb ed="#L" n="64" break="no"/>tum ad effectum, vel dilectionem boni, vel ad similitudinem
<lb ed="#L" n="65"/>quantum ad essentiam, & ad imaginem, quantum ad
super<lb ed="#L" n="66" break="no"/>addita essentiae. Postea dicit quod secundum animam homo
<lb ed="#L" n="67"/>dicitur esse imago Dei, filius Dei proprie est imago patris,
<lb ed="#L" n="68"/>homo vero est imago, quod etiam ad imaginem. Et ideo ho
<lb ed="#L" n="69"/>non habet a se, sed habet eam per creationem. Et subdit quod
<lb ed="#L" n="70"/>huiusmodi inaginis signum est erecta statura, quae apparet in
<lb ed="#L" n="71"/>corpore. Et in hoc terminatur, &c.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>