-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e3048.xml
152 lines (152 loc) · 9.48 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e3048.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 1</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 1</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="136-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048"><!-- l2d16q1 -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048-Hd1e101">Quaestio 1</head>
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Utrum in solis creaturis intellectualibus sit imago Dei</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048-d1e106">
<lb ed="#L" n="72"/>tirio
i<lb ed="#L" n="73" break="no"/>Vtrum in solis creaturis
intellectua<lb ed="#L" n="74" break="no"/>libus sit imago.
<lb ed="#L" n="75"/>Thom. ὶ 4 vi. a. 1.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048-d1e117">
<!--00339.xml-->
<cb ed="#L" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#L" n="76"/>CIRCA dist. 16. quaeruntur duo. Primum est vtrum
<lb ed="#L" n="77"/>in solis creaturis intellectualibus sit imago. Et
vide<lb ed="#L" n="78" break="no"/>tur quod non, quia imago Dei reperitur in
creatu<lb ed="#L" n="79" break="no"/>Tris: vel vt imitantur essentiam diuinam sub rationi
<lb ed="#L" n="80"/>naturae, vel sub ratione ideae, non vt imitantur ipsam in
ratio<lb ed="#L" n="81" break="no"/>ne naturae. Quia secundum Hilarium imago est species
indiffe<lb ed="#L" n="82" break="no"/>rens. Sed quo ad esse naturale quaelibet natura differt ab
essen<lb ed="#L" n="83" break="no"/>tia diuina, plusquam specie, ergo vt imitantur ipsam sub
ra<lb ed="#L" n="84" break="no"/>tione ideae: Sed creatura irrationalis aeque perfecte imitatur
<lb ed="#L" n="85"/>ideam secundum quam producitur sicut creatura rationalis,
<lb ed="#L" n="86"/>ergo in vtraque reperitur aequaliter imago.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048-d1e148">
<lb ed="#L" n="87"/>
<!--2--> IN CONTRARIVM est quod dicit Aug. 14. de tri
<lb ed="#L" n="88"/>nit. quod anima est ad imaginem Dei, quia capax eius est, & lo
<lb ed="#L" n="89"/>quitur de capacitate per cognitionem & amorem, sed haec
<lb ed="#L" n="90"/>non inuenitur in creaturis irrationalibus, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048-d1e162">
<lb ed="#L" n="91"/>
<!--3--> RESPONSIO. Videnda sunt duo. Primum est
quali<lb ed="#L" n="92" break="no"/>ter possit imago Dei reperiri in creaturis. Secundum erit in
<lb ed="#L" n="93"/>quibus creaturis reperiatur.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048-d1e173">
<lb ed="#L" n="94"/>
<!--4--> CIRCA primum sciendum quod cum imago dicat
per<lb ed="#L" n="95" break="no"/>fectam repraesentationem eius cuius est imago hoc potest fieri
<lb ed="#L" n="96"/>dupliciter. Vno modo participando eandem speciem sicut
fi<lb ed="#L" n="97" break="no"/>lius simillimus patri, dicitur imago patris. Et hoc modo in
di<lb ed="#L" n="98" break="no"/>uinis filius dicitur imago patris. Si tamen proprie dicitur
ima<lb ed="#L" n="99" break="no"/>go, quia non est participatione essentiae diuinae similis patri, sed
<lb ed="#L" n="100"/>idem. Alio modo dicitur aliquid imago alterius non quidem
<lb ed="#L" n="101"/>participando eandem speciem, sed alteram, speciei tamen
de<lb ed="#L" n="102" break="no"/>monstratiuam. Sicut imago Herculis dicitur aliquid sculptum
<lb ed="#L" n="103"/>in lapide vel pictum in pariete quod licet sit alterius naturae a
<lb ed="#L" n="104"/>natura Herculis, tamen Herculem demonstrat vel
repraesen<lb ed="#L" n="105" break="no"/>tat. Primo modo nulla creatura potest esse imago Dei.
Secun<lb ed="#L" n="106" break="no"/>do autem modo potest vt statim patebit.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048-d1e206">
<lb ed="#L" n="107"/>QUANTVM ad secundum notandum est quod imago Dei
<lb ed="#L" n="108"/>in creaturis dicitur dupliciter scilicet quo ad essentialia, vel quo ad
<lb ed="#L" n="109"/>personalia & haec dicitur imago trinitatis. Imago quo ad essen
<lb ed="#L" n="110"/>tialia consistit in repraesentatione diuinae naturae per naturam
<lb ed="#L" n="111"/>creatam, sed imago trinitatis non consistit in repraesentationi
<lb ed="#L" n="112"/>trinitatis increatae per creaturam quo ad naturam partium
tri<lb ed="#L" n="113" break="no"/>nitatis vt sic loquamur. Non enim sicut partes trinitatis
increa<lb ed="#L" n="114" break="no"/>tae sunt tria supposita pater & filius & spiritus sanctus, sic
par<lb ed="#L" n="115" break="no"/>tes trinitatis creatae sunt vt pater & filius & spirits sanctus tria
<lb ed="#L" n="116"/>supposita, sed consistit imago trinitatis in simili proportione
par<lb ed="#L" n="117" break="no"/>tium hic & ibi. vt sicut in trinitate increata sunt tria habentia
ta<lb ed="#L" n="118" break="no"/>lem habitudinem originis sic in trinitate creata. Et ideo
con<lb ed="#L" n="119" break="no"/>sueuit dici quod est ibi quaedam proportionabilitas quae est
habi<lb ed="#L" n="120" break="no"/>tudo duarum proportionum, dicendum ergo quod in solis
creatu<lb ed="#L" n="121" break="no"/>ris intellectualibus reperitur imago Dei, quo ad essentialia &
<lb ed="#L" n="122"/>quoad personalia, quod primo patet de essentialibus. Illud enim
<lb ed="#L" n="123"/>solum potest habere rationem imaginis naturae diuinae quod est
<lb ed="#L" n="124"/>productum in participatione vltimae & completae & quasi
speci<lb ed="#L" n="125" break="no"/>ficae perfectionis diuinae. Cuius ratio est quia imago vt dictum esti
<lb ed="#L" n="126"/>dicitur aliquid productum in expressam & specificam
repraesen<lb ed="#L" n="127" break="no"/>tationem, sed sola creatura intellectualis est huiusmodi. vltima!
<lb ed="#L" n="128"/>enim & quasi specifica perfectio, siue in Deo intellecta, siue rebus/
<lb ed="#L" n="129"/>communicata est intellectualitas, ergo &c. Idem patet de
ima<lb ed="#L" n="130" break="no"/>gine trinitatis, quia ibi est solum inuenire imaginem trinitatis
<lb ed="#L" n="131"/>vbi sunt tria vnum in essentia & distincta relationibus originis
<lb ed="#L" n="132"/>hoc autem est solum in creaturis rationalibus vel intellectuali
<lb ed="#L" n="133"/>bus quo ad memoriam, intelligentiam, & voluntatem, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3048-d1e267">
<lb ed="#L" n="134"/>
<!--6--> AD ARGVMENTVM in oppositum dicendum?
<lb ed="#L" n="135"/>creatura dicitur imago Dei, quia repraesentat essentiam diuinam
<lb ed="#L" n="136"/>quo ad esse naturae secundum illud quod intelligitur in Dec
<lb ed="#L" n="137"/>quasi specificum. Hoc autem fit non participando eandem
na<lb ed="#L" n="138" break="no"/>turam secundum speciem, de qua imagine procedit dictum
<lb ed="#L" n="139"/>Hylarij, sed participando aliam naturam diuinae tamen
natu<lb ed="#L" n="140" break="no"/>rae repraesentatiuam secundum illud quod in Deo intelligitur
<lb ed="#L" n="141"/>quasi specificum, imago autem trinitatis attenditur secundum
<lb ed="#L" n="142"/>similitudinem proportionis vt dictum est.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>