-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e3660.xml
147 lines (147 loc) · 8.41 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e3660.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 3</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 3</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="155-v"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="b"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660"><!-- l2d29q3 -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-Hd1e101">Quaestio 3</head>
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Utrum opera hominis fuissent tunc magis meritoria quam nunc</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-d1e106">
<lb ed="#L" n="125"/>VAITIO TIITIA.
<lb ed="#L" n="126"/>Vtrum in statu innocentiae opera
<lb ed="#L" n="127"/>fuissent magis meritoria
<lb ed="#L" n="128"/>quam modo.
<lb ed="#L" n="129"/>Thum. 1. q. 95. ar. 4.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-d1e119">
<lb ed="#L" n="130"/>EINDB quaeritur vrrum in tatu inmocentiae
<lb ed="#L" n="131"/>opera fuissent magis meritoria quam modo. E
<lb ed="#L" n="132"/>videtur quod non, quia difficultas operis facit ad
<lb ed="#L" n="133"/>augmentum meriti. Vnde & virtus est circa
bo<lb ed="#L" n="134" break="no"/>num & difficile, sed modo difficilius est bene ope
<lb ed="#L" n="135"/>rari quam prius, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-d1e135">
<lb ed="#L" n="136"/>
<!--2--> Item bonum additum bono totum facit melius, sed nunc es
<lb ed="#L" n="137"/>meritum essentiale ex radice charitatis, cui additur meritun
<lb ed="#L" n="138"/>accidentale ex difficultate operis. Et istad non fuisset in stati
<lb ed="#L" n="139"/>innocentiae, quare &c.
<lb ed="#L" n="140"/>IN CONTRARIVM est, quia quanto aliquid ei
<lb ed="#L" n="141"/>purius, tanto est melius in illo genere, sed in statu innocentia
<lb ed="#L" n="142"/>merita fuissent puriora, quia non fuissent permixta cum
deme<lb ed="#L" n="143" break="no"/>ritis sicut modo, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-d1e158">
<lb ed="#L" n="144"/>
<!--4--> RESPONSIO. Comparatio meritorum, de qua nun
<lb ed="#L" n="145"/>agitur, potest fieri vel secundum totum statum, vel secundum parti
<lb ed="#L" n="146"/>culares personas vtriusque status, si secundum totum statum, sic dici
<lb ed="#L" n="147"/>quod merita status innocentiae & status moderni sunt aequalia, qui
<lb ed="#L" n="148"/>quantitas meriti innotescit ex quantitate praemij, sed praemiun
<lb ed="#L" n="149"/>saltem essentiale est idem & aequale quod conferetur pro meri
<lb ed="#L" n="150"/>tis moderni status, & quod collatum fuisset pro meritis statu
<lb ed="#L" n="151"/>innocentiae si durasset, ergo &c. Minor probatur, quia praemiun
<lb ed="#L" n="152"/>quod reddetur pro meritis status moderni est quod erimu
<lb ed="#L" n="153"/>aequales angelis dei, in gloria: tunc autem non fuisset praenuiun
<lb ed="#L" n="154"/>maius, quia natura humana non est dignior angelica, nec mi¬
<!--00379.xml-->
<pb ed="#L" n="156-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#L" n="1"/>nus, quia non esset ignobilior instituta quam destituta,
qua<lb ed="#L" n="2" break="no"/>re &c. Si autem in statu moderno ipse Christus includeretur,
<lb ed="#L" n="3"/>tunc merita status moderni excederent merita status
innocen<lb ed="#L" n="4" break="no"/>tiae: nullus enim in statu innocentiae peruenisset ad
aequalita<lb ed="#L" n="5" break="no"/>tem gratiae & gloriae Christi.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-d1e204">
<lb ed="#L" n="6"/>
<!--5--> Quantum autem ad meritum accidentale quod est ex
diffi<lb ed="#L" n="7" break="no"/>cultate operis, sicut in martyrio vel virginitate, non est dubium
<lb ed="#L" n="8"/>quod merita moderna excedunt merita quae tunc fuissent. Si autem
<lb ed="#L" n="9"/>fiat comparatio meritorum personarum singularium status
pri<lb ed="#L" n="10" break="no"/>stini & moderni, sic dicendum quod tantum possunt homines
<lb ed="#L" n="11"/>mereri nunc quantum tunc, sed non ita faciliter. Quod patet,
<lb ed="#L" n="12"/>quia vbi nullum est retractiuum a bono, ibi voluntas
prom<lb ed="#L" n="13" break="no"/>ptius & facilius fertur in bonum, sed in statu innocentiae nullum
<lb ed="#L" n="14"/>fuit retractiuum a bono, sicut modo est in nobis ex
repugnan<lb ed="#L" n="15" break="no"/>tia carnis ad spiritum, ergo, &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-d1e230">
<lb ed="#L" n="16"/>
<!--6--> Veruntamen quia eadem principia bonae operationis (
sci<lb ed="#L" n="17" break="no"/>licet ratio & voluntas) sunt in nobis quae fuerunt in illo statu,
<lb ed="#L" n="18"/>nec deest gratia seu acceptatio diuina bonis operibus nostris,
<lb ed="#L" n="19"/>sicut nec bonis operibus aliorum defuisset, manifestum est quod
<lb ed="#L" n="20"/>aeque bene potest nunc operari, sicut tunc, licet non aeque
fa<lb ed="#L" n="21" break="no"/>ciliter, quae difficultas aut non auget meritum, quia non est ex
<lb ed="#L" n="22"/>natura operis, sed conditione operantis, vel si auget illud
per<lb ed="#L" n="23" break="no"/>tinet ad meritum accidentale, non essentiale.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-d1e252">
<lb ed="#L" n="24"/>
<!--7.--> Per hoc patet. Ad primum argumentum.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3660-d1e259">
<lb ed="#L" n="25"/>
<!--8.--> Secundum etiam argumentum solum probat quod merita status
<lb ed="#L" n="26"/>moderni excedunt merita status innocentiae, quoad merita
ac<lb ed="#L" n="27" break="no"/>cidentalia. Quod autem in contrarium dicitur quod merita nostra
<lb ed="#L" n="28"/>sunt mixta demeritis falsum est, licet enim in nobis sint merita,
<lb ed="#L" n="29"/>sint etiam demerita: non sunt tamen permixta, vt ex demeritis
<lb ed="#L" n="30"/>minuantur merita extensiue vel intensiue, licet fructus eorum
<lb ed="#L" n="31"/>impediatur vsque ad solutionem reatus demeritorum.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>