-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e3750.xml
159 lines (159 loc) · 9.55 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-d1e3750.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 2</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 2</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="159-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750"><!-- l2d31q2 -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-Hd1e101">Quaestio 2</head>
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Utrum formatus miraculose ex humana carne puta digito vel pede
contraheret peccatum originale</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-d1e106">
<lb ed="#L" n="50"/>VALITIOSTCVNDA
<lb ed="#L" n="51"/>um miraculose formatus ex carne hominis
<lb ed="#L" n="52"/>praeexistentis contraheret
pec<lb ed="#L" n="53" break="no"/>catum originale.
<lb ed="#L" n="54"/>Thom. 1. 2. 9. 81. ar. 4.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-d1e119">
<lb ed="#L" n="55"/>SECVNDO quaeritur, si aliquis formaretur im
<lb ed="#L" n="56"/>raculos e ex humana carne, puta de digito vel
p<lb ed="#L" n="57" break="no"/>de, vtrum contraheret originale peccatum. Es
<lb ed="#L" n="58"/>videtur quod sic: quia ex massa corrupta non po
<lb ed="#L" n="59"/>test fieri nisi opus corruptum. Sed tota massa
<lb ed="#L" n="60"/>humanae naturae fuit in Adam corrupta, ergo quicquid
forma<lb ed="#L" n="61" break="no"/>retur ex ea quocunque modo esset corruptum.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-d1e137">
<lb ed="#L" n="62"/>
<!--2.--> Item Dam. dicit in 4. lib. quod spiritussanctus praeuenit in
vir<lb ed="#L" n="63" break="no"/>gine, de qua Christus erat absque peccato originali nascitura
<lb ed="#L" n="64"/>purgans eam, sed illa purgatio non fuisset necessaria, nisi in mati
<lb ed="#L" n="65"/>ria esset aliqua foeditas, ex quo originale contraheretur: ergo in
<lb ed="#L" n="66"/>Comni formato materialiter de carne humana quantumcunque
<lb ed="#L" n="67"/>formetur ex parte agentis miraculose esset peccatu originale
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-d1e156">
<lb ed="#L" n="68"/>
<!--3--> IN CONTRARIVM est quod dicit Augu. in 10
<lb ed="#L" n="69"/>super Gene. ad literam, quod descendere ab Adam secundun
<lb ed="#L" n="70"/>rationem seminalem est causa contrahendi peccatum origi
<lb ed="#L" n="71"/>nale sed formatus miraculose de manu hominis vel pede nor
<lb ed="#L" n="72"/>descenderet ab Adam secundum rationem seminalem, sed
so<lb ed="#L" n="73" break="no"/>Ium secundum corpulentam substantiam, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-d1e174">
<lb ed="#L" n="74"/>
<!--4--> RESPONSIO. Dicendum quod formatus miraculos.
<lb ed="#L" n="75"/>ex humana carne non contraheret peccatum originale. Quod
<lb ed="#L" n="76"/>patet sic, quia ad illud ad quod natura se habet solum passiue &
<lb ed="#L" n="77"/>nullo modo actiue non potest natura aliquid transfundere, neque
<lb ed="#L" n="78"/>perfectionem, neque defectum. Transfusio enim aliquam actio
<!--00385.xml-->
<cb ed="#L" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#L" n="79"/>nem importat, sed ad ilum qui miraculos e formaretur ex huma
<lb ed="#L" n="80"/>na carne natura solum se haberet passiue & nullo modo actue,
<lb ed="#L" n="81"/>ergo ad talem non transfunderetur originalis culpa, nec a
prin<lb ed="#L" n="82" break="no"/>cipio transfusa fuisset originalis iustitia, quis enim
transfunde<lb ed="#L" n="83" break="no"/>ret? Deus an natura? non Deus, quia ab ipso non est culpa, nec
<lb ed="#L" n="84"/>reatus. Nec natura quia natura nihil operatur in tale prole
ni<lb ed="#L" n="85" break="no"/>si ministrando materiam ex qua nec culpa nec reatus potest in
<lb ed="#L" n="86"/>animam redundare, vt ostensum est in praecedente quaestione
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-d1e211">
<lb ed="#L" n="87"/>
<!--5--> Concordat autem hoc ei quod ab omnibus conceditur, sc
<lb ed="#L" n="88"/>licet quod iustitia originalis data fuit Adae pro se & tota poste
<lb ed="#L" n="89"/>ritate quam peccando amisit pro se & pro posteritate, ac per
<lb ed="#L" n="90"/>hoc tota posteritas peccatum originale incurrit. Sed constat
<lb ed="#L" n="91"/>quod formatus miraculos e de manu vel pede non pertineret
<lb ed="#L" n="92"/>ad posteritatem Adae, talis enim non haberet patrem aut
ma<lb ed="#L" n="93" break="no"/>trem in tota humana specie sicut fuit Eua, licet fuerit formata
<lb ed="#L" n="94"/>de costa Adae, ideo &c. Per idem patet quod si Adam peccasset
<lb ed="#L" n="95"/>& non Eua proles contraxisset peccatum originale quia patris
<lb ed="#L" n="96"/>est agere, mater vero solum materiam administrat, & per
con<lb ed="#L" n="97" break="no"/>sequens proles fuisset mortalis & passibilis, quia sicut per vnum
<lb ed="#L" n="98"/>hominem peccatum intrauit in mundum, ita per peccatum
<lb ed="#L" n="99"/>mors vt dicitur. Roma. 5. Si vero sola mulier peccasset, proles
<lb ed="#L" n="100"/>nata fuisset cum originali iustitia & per consequens cum
im<lb ed="#L" n="101" break="no"/>mortalitate & impassibilitate illius status.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-d1e248">
<lb ed="#L" n="102"/>
<!--6--> AD PRIMVM argumentum dicendum qued tota massa
<lb ed="#L" n="103"/>generis humani non fuit infecta vel corrupta in Adam
forma<lb ed="#L" n="104" break="no"/>liter, sed solum virtualiter inquantum in ipso omnes eramus
<lb ed="#L" n="105"/>vt in principio generationis actiuo quod vocat beatus Augu
<lb ed="#L" n="106"/>fuisse in Adam secundum rationem seminalem, sic autem non
<lb ed="#L" n="107"/>fuissent in Adam qui formati fuissent formata de massa
corru<lb ed="#L" n="108" break="no"/>pta, sed fuissent miraculose, & ideo non fuissent in eo solum vi
<lb ed="#L" n="109"/>in principio passiuo quod vocat Augustinus fuisse in Adam
<lb ed="#L" n="110"/>secundum corpulentam substantiam quae non est causa
gene<lb ed="#L" n="111" break="no"/>ralis corruptionis in prole, vt ipsemet dicit.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-d1e3750-d1e274">
<lb ed="#L" n="112"/>
<!--7.--> Ad secundum dicendum quod purgatio de qua loquitur Dam
<lb ed="#L" n="113"/>non fuit aliqua foeditas materiae quae nisi purgaretur causare
<lb ed="#L" n="114"/>peccatum originale in prole, hoc enim absurdum est dicer
<lb ed="#L" n="115"/>etiam concedenti quod tota humana natura materialiter fuerit
<lb ed="#L" n="116"/>corrupta, quia materia quam ministrat mater ad formationem
<lb ed="#L" n="117"/>prolis nunquam fuit de veritate matris: & ideo dato quod
to<lb ed="#L" n="118" break="no"/>ta natura humana fuisset infecta, nihil tamen infectionis esset
<lb ed="#L" n="119"/>propter hoc in tali materia, vocat ergo Dam. purgationem non
<lb ed="#L" n="120"/>emundationem a foeditate quae inerat, sed praeseruationem ab
<lb ed="#L" n="121"/>ea quae inesse poterat scilicet culpa actuali. Ex tunc enim
bea<lb ed="#L" n="122" break="no"/>ta virgo peccare non potuit mortaliter nec venialiter.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>