-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-e191998.xml
127 lines (127 loc) · 7.13 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-e191998.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 7</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 7</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="233-v"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998"><!-- l3d31q7 -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998-Hd1e101">Quaestio 7</head>
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Utrum scientia euacuetur in patria</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998-d1e106">
<!--00540.xml-->
<cb ed="#L" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#L" n="79"/>QVABITIO 313.
<lb ed="#L" n="80"/>Vtrum scientia euacuetur in patria.
<lb ed="#L" n="81"/>Thun. i α . 6. . 3.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998-d1e119">
<lb ed="#L" n="82"/>OSTEA quaeritur, vtrum scientia eumacuetur
<lb ed="#L" n="83"/>in patria. Et videtur quod sic, quia I. Corint. 13.
<lb ed="#L" n="84"/>dicitur, siue scientia destruetur, sed destructio
<lb ed="#L" n="85"/>i scientiae est eius euacuatio, igitur &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998-d1e130">
<lb ed="#L" n="86"/>Item in patria nihil erit superfluum, sed
co<lb ed="#L" n="87" break="no"/>gnitio rerum in verbo erit in beatis sufficientissima, ergo
om<lb ed="#L" n="88" break="no"/>nia alia superfluerent, quod est inconueniens.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998-d1e140">
<lb ed="#L" n="89"/>IN CONTRARIVM est, quia in Christo praeter
<lb ed="#L" n="90"/>scientiam beatam fuit alia scientia: ergo similiter in beatis
prae<lb ed="#L" n="91" break="no"/>ter cognitionem rerum in verbo potest esse scientia, quam hic
<lb ed="#L" n="92"/>de rebus acquisierunt,
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998-d1e151">
<lb ed="#L" n="93"/>
<!--4--> Et iterum, in beatis angelis ponitur cognitio duplex,
scili<lb ed="#L" n="94" break="no"/>cet matutina & vespertina, hoc est rerum in verbo & in
pro<lb ed="#L" n="95" break="no"/>prio genere: ergo similiter ponenda est duplex scientia in
homi<lb ed="#L" n="96" break="no"/>nibus beatis. Hoc autem non esset, nisi scientia hic acquisita
<lb ed="#L" n="97"/>maneret, ergo &c.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998-d1e167">
<lb ed="#L" n="98"/>
<!--5--> RESPONSIO. Quamuis sit valde difficile videre
<lb ed="#L" n="99"/>quomodo duo actus intelligendi simul possint esse in eodem
<lb ed="#L" n="100"/>intellectu, & maxime respectu eiusdem obiecti, tamen doctore
<lb ed="#L" n="101"/>tenent communiter quod scientia hic acquisita manebit in
bea<lb ed="#L" n="102" break="no"/>tis, non solum quantum ad habitum, sed etiam quantum ad
<lb ed="#L" n="103"/>actum: exclusa tamen imperfectione quae pro statu viae
inueni<lb ed="#L" n="104" break="no"/>tur in actu scientiae acquisitae, & persuadent hoc tali ratione,
<lb ed="#L" n="105"/>gloria non tollit perfectionem naturae, sed scientia non solum
<lb ed="#L" n="106"/>quo ad habitum, sed etiam quantum ad actum pertinet ad
per<lb ed="#L" n="107" break="no"/>fectionem naturae, imo summa perfectio naturae humanae, quam
<lb ed="#L" n="108"/>ex naturalibus potest acquirere ponitur in actu sciendi;
ergi<lb ed="#L" n="109" break="no"/>gloria non tollit scientiam quantum ad habitum, neque
quan<lb ed="#L" n="110" break="no"/>tum ad actum, sed solum quantum ad modum imperfectionis
<lb ed="#L" n="111"/>quam habet in statu praesenti, & quamuis ad hanc rationem
<lb ed="#L" n="112"/>posset dici quod gloria non tollit perfectionem naturae, nisi dando
<lb ed="#L" n="113"/>maiorem perfectionem primam eminentius continentem,
qua<lb ed="#L" n="114" break="no"/>liter cognitio beata continet omnem cognitionem naturalem,
<lb ed="#L" n="115"/>tamen in supradicta ratione fistunt doctores, quae non potest
<lb ed="#L" n="116"/>valere nisi ponendo quod visio beata sit alterius generis
proxi<lb ed="#L" n="117" break="no"/>mi, quam quaecunque alia cognitio ipsi compossibilis: hoc enim
<lb ed="#L" n="118"/>modo potest cum visione beata stare alia cognitio, nec apparet
<lb ed="#L" n="119"/>ad praesens alius modus.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e191998-d1e219">
<lb ed="#L" n="120"/>AD PRIMVM argumentum dicendum quod illud 1
<lb ed="#L" n="121"/>Corinth. 13. scientia destruetur, est intelligendum quo ad
neces<lb ed="#L" n="122" break="no"/>sitatem, vel quo ad modum imperfectum, qui nunc est in actu
<lb ed="#L" n="123"/>scientiae, non autem quantum ad substantiam habitus vel actus.
<lb ed="#L" n="124"/>Ad secundum dicendum quod scientia hic acquisita non
su<lb ed="#L" n="125" break="no"/>perfluit in patria, quum sit perfectio naturae, & pertinet ad alium
<lb ed="#L" n="126"/>modum cognoscendi.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>