-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-e263180.xml
103 lines (103 loc) · 5.96 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-e263180.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Praeambulum</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Praeambulum</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="319-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-e263180"><!-- l4d28prae -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-e263180-Hd1e101">Praeambulum</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263180-d1e103">
<lb ed="#L" n="102"/>Sententia huius distinctionis xxviij. in
ge<lb ed="#L" n="103" break="no"/>nerali & speciali.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263180-d1e110">
<lb ed="#L" n="104"/>HIC quaeri debet. Superius determinauit
Magi<lb ed="#L" n="105" break="no"/>ster quod consensus est causa efficiens matrimonium:
<lb ed="#L" n="106"/>hic autem quaerit qualis debet esse consensus qui
<lb ed="#L" n="107"/>matrimonium facit. Et diuiditur in duas. Primum
<lb ed="#L" n="108"/>quod inquirit est, vtrum consensus per verba de
<lb ed="#L" n="109"/>futuro & iuramento firmatum matrimonium faciat. Secundo
in<lb ed="#L" n="110" break="no"/>quirit quis sit ille consensus qui faciat matrimonium ibi. Hic
quae<lb ed="#L" n="111" break="no"/>ritur cum consensus. Prima in tres. Primo determinat veritatem
<lb ed="#L" n="112"/>Secundo contra eam opponit & soluit. Tertio obiicit contra di
<lb ed="#L" n="113"/>cta in superiori distinctione & soluit. Secunda ibi, praemissae au
<lb ed="#L" n="114"/>tem sententiae. Tertia ibi, illi autem scientiae.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263180-d1e136">
<lb ed="#L" n="115"/>
<!--2--> In speciali autem sic procedit, & quaerit primo vtrum
con<lb ed="#L" n="116" break="no"/>sensus per verba de futuro & cum iuramento verum
matrimo<lb ed="#L" n="117" break="no"/>nium faciat. Et respondet quod non, quia per talia verba promitti
<lb ed="#L" n="118"/>tur futurus consensus & non exhibetur, cum iuramentum nihil
<lb ed="#L" n="119"/>aliud sit quam confirmatio promissionis super contractu faciendo
<lb ed="#L" n="120"/>vnde & si alter vel vterque promittentium ad aliam copulam
tran<lb ed="#L" n="121" break="no"/>siret, verum esset coniugium & dissolui non posset. Postea obiicit
<lb ed="#L" n="122"/>in contrarium huius per quandam legem: & dicit quod lex illa
lo<lb ed="#L" n="123" break="no"/>quitur de iuramento adhibito per verba de praesenti: vel lex
di<lb ed="#L" n="124" break="no"/>cit post iuramentum de futuro matrimonium fieri debere, non
<lb ed="#L" n="125"/>autem fore. Postea, quia dictum fuit in praecedenti distinct. quod
<lb ed="#L" n="126"/>solus consensus facit matrimonium, obiicit in contrarium, scilicet
<lb ed="#L" n="127"/>matrimonium non esse si non interueniat benedictio solennis &
<lb ed="#L" n="128"/>quaedam alia. Et respondet quod talia sunt de honestate &
solen<lb ed="#L" n="129" break="no"/>nitate sacramenti, non autem de necessitate. Occultus enim con
<lb ed="#L" n="130"/>sensus per verba de praesenti expressus facit matrimonium, quamuis
<lb ed="#L" n="131"/>ecclesia per talem consensum in iudicio non prosequatur. Vltimo
<lb ed="#L" n="132"/>quaerit in quo debeat esse consensus faciens matrimonium: si enim
<lb ed="#L" n="133"/>in cohabitationem, tunc frater & soror erunt coniuges. Si vero in
<lb ed="#L" n="134"/>carnalem copulam, tunc inter beatam virginem & Ioseph non fuit
<lb ed="#L" n="135"/>coniugium: & respondet quod consensus ille debet esse in coniuga
<lb ed="#L" n="136"/>lem societatem, in cuius societatis signum mulier non de capite,
<lb ed="#L" n="137"/>nec de pedibus, sed de latere viri a Deo formata fuit.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>