-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-e263578.xml
156 lines (156 loc) · 9.49 KB
/
cod-du87us_jsnvu6-e263578.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Quaestio 2</title>
<author ref="#Durandus">Durandus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Quaestio 2</title>
<date when="2023-08-20">August 20, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="L" n="cod-du87us">Lyon 1563</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-08-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#L" n="319-v"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="b"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578"><!-- l4d28q2 -->
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-Hd1e101">Quaestio 2</head>
<head xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Utrum consensus de praesenti conditiona
faciat matrimonium</head>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-d1e106">
<lb ed="#L" n="95"/>QVAESTIO SECVNDA.
<lb ed="#L" n="96"/>Vtrum consensus de praesenti conditiona
<lb ed="#L" n="97"/>faciat matrimonium.
<lb ed="#L" n="98"/>In 3. d. 39. 4. 4.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-d1e117">
<lb ed="#L" n="99"/>SECVNDO quaeritur vtrum consensus de praesenti
<lb ed="#L" n="100"/>conditionatus faciat matrimonium. Et videtur quod
<lb ed="#L" n="101"/>non: quia consensus faciens matrimonium debet esse
<lb ed="#L" n="102"/>certus, sed consensus conditionatus non est
cer<lb ed="#L" n="103" break="no"/>gi tus, cum innitatur dubio conditionis, ergo non
fa<lb ed="#L" n="104" break="no"/>cit matrimonium.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-d1e133">
<lb ed="#L" n="105"/>
<!--2--> Item consensus simplex de futuro cum iuramentum certior
<lb ed="#L" n="106"/>est quam consensus de praesenti conditionatus, sed consensus
<lb ed="#L" n="107"/>simplex de futuro quantumcunque vallatus iuramento non
fa<lb ed="#L" n="108" break="no"/>cit matrimonium: vt patet per magistrum in litera, ergo nec
con<lb ed="#L" n="109" break="no"/>sensus de praesenti conditionatus.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-d1e150">
<lb ed="#L" n="110"/>IN OPPOSITVM est, quia alij contractus fiunt cum
<lb ed="#L" n="111"/>conditione, ergo & matrimonium.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-d1e157">
<lb ed="#L" n="112"/>
<!--4--> RESPONSIO. Consensus potest conditionari
dupli<lb ed="#L" n="113" break="no"/>citer. Vno modo limitatione temporis: vt si dicatur, accipio te
<lb ed="#L" n="114"/>in meam vsque ad duos annos, vel expressione alterius
condi<lb ed="#L" n="115" break="no"/>tionis. Si primo modo non est matrimonium: quia consensus qui
<lb ed="#L" n="116"/>est contra naturam contractus vitiat contractum, sed consensus
<lb ed="#L" n="117"/>vsque ad tempus est contra naturam matrimonij, ergo vitiat &
<lb ed="#L" n="118"/>tollit matrimonium. Minor patet: quia de natura matrimonij, vt
<lb ed="#L" n="119"/>pertinet ad ius naturale & quatenus est ad educationem prolis,
<lb ed="#L" n="120"/>& vt pertinet ad ius diuinum, & quatenus est sacramentum est
<lb ed="#L" n="121"/>inseparabilitas, contra quam est consensus ad tempus.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-d1e183">
<lb ed="#L" n="122"/>De aliis autem conditionibus intelligendum est, quod aut
<lb ed="#L" n="123"/>conditio est de praesenti, aut de futuro: si de praesenti sic
extan<lb ed="#L" n="124" break="no"/>te conditione stat matrimonium, non extante vero non extat, nisi
<lb ed="#L" n="125"/>si forte sit conditio impossibilis quae in fauorem matrimonij
<lb ed="#L" n="126"/>debet semper haberi pro non adiecta, & idem est si conditio sit
<lb ed="#L" n="127"/>de praeterito. Si vero sit conditio de futuro: aut est necessaria, &
<lb ed="#L" n="128"/>tunc habetur pro completa, et stat matrimonium: vt si dicatur,
<lb ed="#L" n="129"/>contraho tecum si sol oriatur cras. aut impossibilis, & tunc
ha<lb ed="#L" n="130" break="no"/>betur pro non adiecta, & stat matrimonium: aut contingens, &
<lb ed="#L" n="131"/>tunc si est contra bona matrimonij nullum est matrimonium,
<lb ed="#L" n="132"/>neque sponsalia, vt si dicatur contraho tecum si generationem
<lb ed="#L" n="133"/>prolis euites: aut si pro quaestu ad adulterandum te tradas, per
<lb ed="#L" n="134"/>eandem rationem quae dicta est de consensu ad tempus. Si vero
<lb ed="#L" n="135"/>non sit contra bona matrimonij, si sit honesta, non contrahitur
<lb ed="#L" n="136"/>matrimonium, sed sponsalia tantum extante conditione, non
<lb ed="#L" n="137"/>extante vero non. Cuius ratio est, quia consensus
conditiona<lb ed="#L" n="138" break="no"/>tus sequitur naturam conditionis licitae & honestae: sed conditio
<lb ed="#L" n="139"/>est de futuro & potest non euenire, ergo consensus de futuro
po<lb ed="#L" n="140" break="no"/>test deficere: talis autem consensus non est sufficiens ad
contra<lb ed="#L" n="141" break="no"/>hendum matrimonium, quod est indissolubile, nisi per mortem
<lb ed="#L" n="142"/>corporalem vel ciuilem postquam est rite contractum: si autem
<lb ed="#L" n="143"/>sit turpis, debet haberi pro non adiecta. De hoc autem dicetui
<lb ed="#L" n="144"/>plus in sequenti distinctione.
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-d1e235">
<lb ed="#L" n="145"/>
<!--6--> AD PRIMVM argumentum dicendum, quod consensus
<lb ed="#L" n="146"/>conditionatus conditione praeterita vel praesente vel lutura
ne<lb ed="#L" n="147" break="no"/>cessaria certus est, sicut non conditionatus: quia conditio
appo<lb ed="#L" n="148" break="no"/>sita certa est nec tollit a consensu aliquam certitudinem, nec
tur<lb ed="#L" n="149" break="no"/>pis, nec impossibilis, cum habeantur pro non adiectis.
Consensu<lb ed="#L" n="150" break="no"/>vero conditionatus conditione contingente & futura honesta,
<lb ed="#L" n="151"/>incertitudinem habet, sicut & conditio, ideo non causat
matri<lb ed="#L" n="152" break="no"/>monium, sed sponsalia, si conditio eueniat, aliter non¬
</p>
<p xml:id="jsnvu6-e263578-d1e257">
<lb ed="#L" n="153"/>
<!--7--> Ad secundum dicendum qued consensus de futuro addito
iura<lb ed="#L" n="154" break="no"/>mento non est certior quam consensus de praesenti conditionatus
<lb ed="#L" n="155"/>conditionibus praesentibus, vel praeteritis, vel futuris
necessa<lb ed="#L" n="156" break="no"/>rio, imo consensus sic conditionatus est certior, sicut certior est
ex<lb ed="#L" n="157" break="no"/>hibitio rei quam eius promissio quantuncunque vallata iuramento: per
<lb ed="#L" n="158"/>consensum enim de praesenti praedictis modis conditionatum
fi<lb ed="#L" n="159" break="no"/>actualis exhibitio rei per sponsalia autem iuramento firmata non
<lb ed="#L" n="160"/>fit, nisi promissio: quia iuramentum cum adhibeatur ad
confirma<lb ed="#L" n="161" break="no"/>tionem dictorum illud tantum confirmat, quod in dictis significatur,
<!--00713.xml-->
<pb ed="#L" n="320-r"/>
<cb ed="#L" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#L" n="1"/>nec significatum mutat. Et ideo cum verba de futuro, ex sua signi
<lb ed="#L" n="2"/>ficatione habeant quod non faciant matrimonium, sed solum spon
<lb ed="#L" n="3"/>sionem matrimonij, ideo iuramentum adueniens solum confir
<lb ed="#L" n="4"/>mat sponsalia, sed non transfert ea in matrimonium.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>