-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
/
cod-ve07v1_kzz7yh-a24585.xml
117 lines (117 loc) · 7.04 KB
/
cod-ve07v1_kzz7yh-a24585.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Circa litteram</title>
<author ref="#RicardusDeMediavilla">Ricardus de Mediavilla</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Circa litteram</title>
<date when="2023-09-18">September 18, 2023</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="V" n="cod-ve07v1">Venice, 1507, v. 1</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2023-09-18" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#V" n="36-v"/>
<cb ed="#V" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="kzz7yh-a24585"><!-- l1d9cl -->
<head xml:id="kzz7yh-a24585-Hd1e101">Circa litteram</head>
<p xml:id="kzz7yh-a24585-d1e103">
<lb ed="#V" n="40"/>CIrca litteram (Non est aliud pater: aliud
fi<lb ed="#V" n="41" break="no"/>lius.) Contra videtur sequi
<lb ed="#V" n="42"/>alius: ergo aliud. Respondeo. Uerum est in
crea<lb ed="#V" n="43" break="no"/>turis: in quibus non est distinctio in persona sine
<lb ed="#V" n="44"/>distinctione in essentia. In deo autem est
distinctio<lb ed="#V" n="45" break="no"/>in persona sine distinctione in essentia. (Coeterne sibi sunt
<lb ed="#V" n="46"/>tres persone.) Contra sequitur vt videtur. Tres
coeter<lb ed="#V" n="47" break="no"/>ni: ergo tres eterni: sed vt dicitur in symbolo. Non sunt
<lb ed="#V" n="48"/>tres eterni. Responsio quod in diuinis. Nomen significans
<lb ed="#V" n="49"/>substantiam reperitur secundum triplicem modum. Quoddam
<lb ed="#V" n="50"/>enim est significans substantiam per modum substantie: et
<lb ed="#V" n="51"/>tale nullo modo debet dici in plurali siue sit substantiuum
<lb ed="#V" n="52"/>vt hoc nomen deus: siue substantiuatum: vt hoc nomen
<lb ed="#V" n="53"/>eternum. vnde tres persone non debent dici dii: nec
plu<lb ed="#V" n="54" break="no"/>ra eterna. Quoddam significat per modum adiacentie:
<lb ed="#V" n="55"/>sicut adiectiua adiectiue retenta: et quia talia trahunt
nu<lb ed="#V" n="56" break="no"/>merum a suppositis possunt dici in plurali: et talia sunt
ver<lb ed="#V" n="57" break="no"/>ba et participia. Aliud est nomen quod significat substantiam
<lb ed="#V" n="58"/>in adiacentia connotando inter relationem mutuam: sicut
<lb ed="#V" n="59"/>hoc nomen coeternus: et tale etiam potest dici in plurali.
</p>
<p xml:id="kzz7yh-a24585-d1e149">
<lb ed="#V" n="60"/>¶ Unde bene dicitur tres persone sunt coeterne.
Splen<lb ed="#V" n="61" break="no"/>dor qui gignitur ab igne atque diffunditur coeuus est illi.
<lb ed="#V" n="62"/>Ex hoc videtur argui quod illuminatio medii sit in
instan<lb ed="#V" n="63" break="no"/>ti. Et quia hoc aliquibus videtur dubium: et aliquibus
<lb ed="#V" n="64"/>falsum: ideo glosant auctoritatem sic: vt per
splendorem<lb ed="#V" n="65" break="no"/>intelligatur ipsa lux existens in sua radice: vel per
splen<lb ed="#V" n="66" break="no"/>dorem intelligunt initium diffusionis ipsius lucis: quod
<!--00086.xml-->
<cb ed="#P" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#V" n="67"/>quidem initium in instanti est siue illuminatio medum sit in
<lb ed="#V" n="68"/>instanti: siue non. Utrum autem medium illuminetur in in
<lb ed="#V" n="69"/>stanti vel non: in secundo libro declarare propono. (Quod ex
<lb ed="#V" n="70"/>eo nascitur non potuit aliud esse quam viuens:) quia enim
<lb ed="#V" n="71"/>deus est vita: et in vita nihil est nisi viuens non potuit
pro<lb ed="#V" n="72" break="no"/>duci a deo in identitate substantie nisi viuens. (Quod ex
<lb ed="#V" n="73"/>viuo viuum natum est. Habet natiuitatis perfectionem
si<lb ed="#V" n="74" break="no"/>ne nouitate nature.) Uerum est de. viuo in quo nihil est
<lb ed="#V" n="75"/>non viuens: et in quo nihil est in potentia. Et in hoc
ex<lb ed="#V" n="76" break="no"/>cluditur generatio in creaturis: vbi aliquando de viuo
<lb ed="#V" n="77"/>nascitur non viuum: et aliquando de viuo viuum: quod
<lb ed="#V" n="78"/>non habet nature perfectionem: et quod nascitur de creatu
<lb ed="#V" n="79"/>ra nascitur cum nouitate nature. (Sacramento
natiuita<lb ed="#V" n="80" break="no"/>tis.) idest sacro secreto. (Pater enim generatione actor
si<lb ed="#V" n="81" break="no"/>lii est. Nota quod actor proprie non dicit hic causalitatem
<lb ed="#V" n="82"/>Unde debet glosari actor id est principium. (Ab eterno aucto
<lb ed="#V" n="83"/>re eterna natiuitas est. Contra si illud argumentum ese
<lb ed="#V" n="84"/>set bonum: videretur quod etiam sequeretur ab eterno
eter<lb ed="#V" n="85" break="no"/>na creatio: quod falsum est. Respondeo. Non est simile: quia
<lb ed="#V" n="86"/>natiuitas filii dei est de substantia generantis tota. Unde
<lb ed="#V" n="87"/>filius nascendo non accepit nouum esse: sed idem esse ab
<lb ed="#V" n="88"/>solutum: quod habet pater. Creatura autem non accepit idem
<lb ed="#V" n="89"/>esse quod habet creator. Quapropter sequitur quod accepit
<lb ed="#V" n="90"/>nouum esse.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>