-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1.xml
223 lines (223 loc) · 13.9 KB
/
ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 1, Inq. 1, Tract. 2, Q. 3, Tit. 2, C. 1</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-02-14">February 14, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit> <witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness> <witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness> <witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness> <witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness> <witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness> </listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-02-14" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="include-list">
<xi:include href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-lists/master/workscited.xml" xpointer="worksCited"/>
<xi:include href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-lists/master/Prosopography.xml" xpointer="prosopography"/>
</div>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="64"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-Hd1e3729">I, P. 1, Inq. 1, Tract. 2, Q. 3, Tit. 2, C. 1</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-Hd1e3732" type="question-title"><lb ed="#Q"/>AN DEUS SIT ALICUBI VEL NUSQUAM VEL IN SE IPSO<!--1--></head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3736">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quantum ad primum, scilicet<!--a--> an Deus sit ali<lb ed="#Q"/>cubi
sive in loco, sic obicitur: I. a. <title>Cant.</title> 5,17:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Quo abiit dilectus tuus</quote>? <name>Gregorius</name><!--2-->: <quote>Notan<lb ed="#Q"/>dum
quod Deus, qui ubique est, in loco est, sed
<lb ed="#Q"/>localis non est</quote>; sed si<!--b--> in loco est, ergo ali<lb ed="#Q"/>cubi
est<!--3-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3752">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: 1. <name>Boethius</name>, in libro <title>De Trini<lb ed="#Q"/>tate</title><!--4-->:
<quote>Omnino in loco esse non potest qui ubi<lb ed="#Q"/>que
est</quote>; sed Deus ubique est; ergo non potest
<lb ed="#Q"/>esse in aliquo loco; ergo nec alicubi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3763">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, <name ref="#Anselm">Anselmus</name>, in <title>Manologion</title><!--5-->: <quote>In
<lb ed="#Q"/>nullo loco aut tempore est, quia nullum locum aut
<lb ed="#Q"/>tempus habet; nec in se recipit locorum distinctio<lb ed="#Q"/>nem,
ut hic vel ibi vel alicubi, neque temporum, ut
<lb ed="#Q"/>nunc vel tunc vel aliquando</quote>. Ergo non est alicubi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3777">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Item, non potest inveniri comparatio Dei ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>creaturam ut ad locum; ergo non est in aliquo<!--c-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>loco. —Maior patet: quia quidquid est in<!--d--> loco
<lb ed="#Q"/>est in ipso velut contentum vel ut salvatum vel<!--e-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>quietatum in ipso; sed Deus non est in re ut<!--f-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>contentum in re, nec ut salvatum a re, nec etiam
<lb ed="#Q"/>quietatur in re; ergo non potest esse in aliqua
<lb ed="#Q"/>sicut in loco; ergo non est alicubi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3797">
<lb ed="#Q"/>II. Sed tunc iuxta hoc obicitur: quo<lb ed="#Q"/>niam
si non est dicere ipsum esse alicubi, ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>nusquam est. -— Si dicatur quod esse in
<lb ed="#Q"/>loco est dupliciter: vel per definitionem, sicut
<lb ed="#Q"/>spiritus sunt in loco, vel per circumscriptionem,
<lb ed="#Q"/>sicut corpora<!--6-->: istis modis non est Deus in loco,
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>tamen alio modo est in loco<!--g--> - sed tamen, quid<lb ed="#Q"/>quid
dicatur, eo modo quo haec est falsa:<mentioned> Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>est alicubi</mentioned>, est haec vera: <mentioned>Deus est nusquam</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quae est sua contradictoria. — Item, <name>Boethius</name>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>in<!--h--> libro <title>De Trinitate</title><!--7-->: <quote>Ideo nusquam esse
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur, quia ubique est</quote>. Ergo est nusquam.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3828">
<lb ed="#Q"/>III. Ulterius quaeritur de hac: <mentioned>Deus est in se
<lb ed="#Q"/>ipso</mentioned>
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3835">
<lb ed="#Q"/>a. <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, <title>Ad Dardanum</title><!--8-->: <quote>Deus est
<lb ed="#Q"/>ubique et in se ipso; ubique, quia nusquam
<lb ed="#Q"/>est absens; in se ipso, quia<!--i--> non continetur ubi
<lb ed="#Q"/>est praesens, tamquam sine ipsis esse non pos<lb ed="#Q"/>sit</quote>.
Ergo Deus est in se ipso.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3848">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: 1. Deus est ubique; sed hoc quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>est esse ubique non est<!--k--> esse in se ipso; ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>est alibi quam in se ipso; ergo est extra se; non
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo in se ipso. — Si dicatur quod ly <mentioned>ubi—<lb ed="#Q"/>que</mentioned>
non ponit <mentioned>alibi</mentioned> - contra: constat<!--l--> quod
<mentioned>ubique</mentioned> dicit aggregationem locorum; sed con<lb ed="#Q"/>stat
quod haec aggregatio est in rebus creatis
<lb ed="#Q"/>et non in Deo; ergo ponit <mentioned>alibi</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3866">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Solutio: Dicendum<!--m-->, secundum <ref><name ref="#Boethius">Boethium</name>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>in libro <title>De Trinitate</title></ref><!--9-->: <quote><mentioned>Deus est ubique</mentioned> ita
<lb ed="#Q"/>dici videtur non quod sit in omni loco, sed quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>omnis locus ei adsit ad eum capiendum, cum ipse
<lb ed="#Q"/>non capiatur in loco</quote>. Est ergo esse in loco mul<lb ed="#Q"/>tipliciter:
ut dicatur <mentioned>esse in loco</mentioned> contineri a loco,
<lb ed="#Q"/>vel<!--n--> <mentioned>esse in loco</mentioned> non deesse loco, sed ei esse
<lb ed="#Q"/>praesentem et replere iocum. Primo modo non
<pb ed="#Q" n="65"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Deus in loco; et hoc volunt dicere auctori<lb ed="#Q"/>tates
ad istud positae, scilicet quod non<!--a--> sit in
<lb ed="#Q"/>loco ut contentus a loco. Secundo modo est in
<lb ed="#Q"/>loco<!--b-->, non tamen ut dicatur replere locum mate<lb ed="#Q"/>rialiter,
sed virtualiter; secundum quod dicit <ref><name ref="#Augustine">Au<lb ed="#Q"/>gustinus</name>,
<title>Ad Dardanum</title> </ref><!--1-->, quod aliter dicitur<!--c-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>sapientia replere sapientem et aqua vas. Eo modo
<lb ed="#Q"/>quo sapientia replet sapientes, eo modo divina
<lb ed="#Q"/>essentia replet loca: sapientia enim non maior
<lb ed="#Q"/>est in maiore nec minor<!--d--> in minore. Sic Deus
est in locis virtualiter et consummative, in hoc
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod dat locis esse et virtutem qua repleantur.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3930">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta]: I. 1. Ad primam rationem <name>Boe<lb ed="#Q"/>thii</name>
<quote>omnino esse in loco non potest</quote> etc.: si
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicatur esse in loco contentive, verum est; si di<lb ed="#Q"/>catur
esse in loco per praesentiam, falsum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3941">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad <name ref="#Anselm">Anselmi</name> rationem dicendum quod ex
<lb ed="#Q"/>illa auctoritate sequitur quod non sit in loco distinc<lb ed="#Q"/>tive,
ita quod sit in uno loco et non in alio; sed non
<lb ed="#Q"/>sequitur ex hoc quod non sit in loco aliquo modo.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3952">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Ad tertium concedendum quod, secundum
<lb ed="#Q"/>praedictas conditiones loci, non est Deus in loco.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sed praeter has est alia proprietas loci, secundum
<lb ed="#Q"/>quam quidem habet rationem perfectibilis<!--e--> ab eo
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod est in ipso, et secundum hanc Deus est in
<lb ed="#Q"/>loco. Dicerentur enim loca vacua et imperfecta,
<lb ed="#Q"/>nisi replerentur locato: et propter hoc locus dicit
<lb ed="#Q"/>imperfectionem respectu locati; Deus autem per<lb ed="#Q"/>ficit
locum, dando ei virtutem qua continet et sal<lb ed="#Q"/>vat:
et sic est in eo, et non quia ab eo continea<lb ed="#Q"/>tur
et salvetur; et sic replet repletione virtuali.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e3978">
<lb ed="#Q"/>II. Ad aliud<!--f--> dicendum quod haec <mentioned>Deus est
<lb ed="#Q"/>nusquam</mentioned> non est recipienda<!--g--> sine determinatio<lb ed="#Q"/>ne:
negationes enim universaliores sunt affirmatio<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/><lb ed="#Q"/>nibus;
et propter hoc ex hac non solum videntur
<lb ed="#Q"/>tolli a Deo aliae conditiones existendi in loco, immo
<lb ed="#Q"/>etiam repletio, secundum quam dicitur esse in loco.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Et propter hoc, ut concedatur, oportet addi <mentioned>Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>est nusquam circumscriptive vel contentive</mentioned>. Et
<lb ed="#Q"/>in hoc sensu<!--h--> haec est falsa <mentioned>Deus est alicubi</mentioned>
<lb ed="#Q"/>et non aliter; et in<!--i--> hoc sensu dicit <name>Boethius</name><!--2-->:
<quote>Nusquam esse dicitur, quia ubique est</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e4002">
<lb ed="#Q"/>III. Adultimum dicendum quod haec est vera
<mentioned>Deus est in se ipso</mentioned>, et haec similiter <mentioned>Deus est
<lb ed="#Q"/>ubique</mentioned>. Et ex una istarum vult <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>
<lb ed="#Q"/>ostendere praesentiam Dei ad omnem locum, scili<lb ed="#Q"/>cet
ex hac <mentioned>Deus est ubique</mentioned>, cum dicit<!--3-->: <quote>Ubique
<lb ed="#Q"/>est, quia nusquam est absens</quote>; resolvatur enim
<lb ed="#Q"/>haec negatio <mentioned>nusquam est absens</mentioned><!--k--> in affirma<lb ed="#Q"/>tivam,
sensus est: <mentioned>praesens est omni loco</mentioned>. Ex
<lb ed="#Q"/>hac autem <mentioned>Deus est in se ipso</mentioned> removet omnem
<lb ed="#Q"/>dependentiam eius a loco; et propter hoc dicit
<mentioned>in se ipso</mentioned>, quia non continetur iis quibus est
<lb ed="#Q"/>praesens; non enim dependet a loco, sed locus
<lb ed="#Q"/>et mundus ab ipso.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t2q3t2c1-d1e4028">
<lb ed="#Q"/>1. Ad hoc quod obicitur quod <mentioned>est alibi
<lb ed="#Q"/>quam in se ipso et ita extra se</mentioned>: dicendum quod<!--l-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>alia ratione Deus est ubique et Deus est<!--m--> in se ipso:
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur enim ens<!--n--> in se ipso<!--o-->, quia est per se ens,
<lb ed="#Q"/>non indigens alio; unde non notatur hic habi<lb ed="#Q"/>tudo
eius ad rem aliam. Sed cum dicitur <mentioned>Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>est ubique</mentioned> notatur habitudo eius ad rem aliam,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quae est habitudo replentis ad repletum, et non
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum dicitur <mentioned>Deus est ens<!--p--> in se ipso</mentioned>. Ad hoc au<lb ed="#Q"/>tem
quod praedicta ratio procederet, scilicet quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>esset alibi, oporteret quod uniformis modus es<lb ed="#Q"/>sendi
in utrobique notaretur; quod falsum est,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et propter hoc nulla est illa ratio.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>