-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1.xml
209 lines (208 loc) · 12.7 KB
/
ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 1, Inq. 1, Tract. 5, S. 2, Q. 4, T. 1, M. 3, C. 1</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-03-15">March 15, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-03-15" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="322"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-Hd1e3741">I, P. 1, Inq. 1, Tract. 5, S. 2, Q. 4, T. I, M. 3, C. 1</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-Hd1e3744" type="question-title">AN PRAEDESTINATIO ET REPROBATIO CAUSAM HABEANT EX MERITIS PROPRIIS.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3774">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quantum ad primum obicitur sic<!--1-->: 1. Con<lb ed="#Q"/>stans
est quod aliquis potest facere quod ha<lb ed="#Q"/>beat
gratiam, quia si facit quod in se est, habebit
<lb ed="#Q"/>gratiam; et habens gratiam potest facere quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>finaliter habeat gratiam; et si finaliter habet gra<lb ed="#Q"/>tiam,
praedestinatus est; ergo potest aliquis fa<lb ed="#Q"/>cere
quod sit praedestinatus<!--2-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3792">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item<!--b-->, ad <title>Rom.</title> 9,13: <quote><name>Esau</name>, subtracta gra<lb ed="#Q"/>tia,
est reprobatus<!--3--></quote>; sed subtractio gratiae est
<lb ed="#Q"/>ex meritis; ergo reprobatio est ex meritis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3801">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Item, <title>Rom.</title> 9,14 super illud: <quote>Numquid ini<lb ed="#Q"/>quitas
apud Deum</quote>? <title>Glossa</title><!--4-->: <quote><name>Esau</name> per iusti<lb ed="#Q"/>tiam
est reprobatus</quote>. Ergo ex meritis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3810">
<lb ed="#Q"/>4. Item, super <title>Malach.</title> 1,2: <quote>Cuius vult mise<lb ed="#Q"/>retur</quote>
etc., <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name><!--5-->: <quote>Haec voluntas in<lb ed="#Q"/>iusta
esse non potest, quia venit de occultissimis
<lb ed="#Q"/>meritis</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3821">
<lb ed="#Q"/>5. Item, ad <title>Rom.</title> 9,15: <quote>Miserebor cui misere<lb ed="#Q"/>bor</quote>.
<title>Glossa Ambrosii</title><!--6-->: <quote>Dabo illi gratiam
<lb ed="#Q"/>quem<!--c--> scio ad me toto corde post errorem
<lb ed="#Q"/>reversurum, et hoc est dare cui dandum</quote>. Ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>propter futurum servitium datur misericordia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3834">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: a. Esse praedestinatum est esse ab
<lb ed="#Q"/>aeterno<!--7-->; merita nostra habent esse temporale,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et temporale non est causa aeterni; ergo nec me<lb ed="#Q"/>rita
causa praedestinationis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3846">
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>b. Item, ad <title>Tit.</title><!--8-->: <quote>Non<!--d--> ex operibus iustitiae,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quae fecimus nos, sed secundum suam misericor<lb ed="#Q"/>diam
salvos nos fecit</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3857">
<lb ed="#Q"/>c. Item, ad <title>Rom.</title> 11,6 probat <name ref="#Paul">Apostolus</name> quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>gratia non potest esse ex meritis, <quote>alioquin gratia
<lb ed="#Q"/>non esset gratia</quote>. Si ergo infusio gratiae, quae
<lb ed="#Q"/>est temporalis, non potest esse ex meritis, ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>nec praedestinatio quae est aeterna.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3870">
<lb ed="#Q"/>d. Item, <title>Glossa</title><!--9--> ad <title>Rom.</title> 9,13: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-Qd1e3874" source="http://scta.info/resource/rom9_13">Iacob di<lb ed="#Q"/>lexi
</quote> etc.<!--e-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-Qd1e3879">Sine meritis unum dilexi, alium re<lb ed="#Q"/>probavi</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3885">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo: In nomine praedestinationis et re<lb ed="#Q"/>probationis
intelliguntur plura. In praedestina<lb ed="#Q"/>tione
enim intelligitur praescientia et gratia et
<lb ed="#Q"/>gloria respectu quorum est praedestinatio. Simi<lb ed="#Q"/>liter
in reprobatione sunt tria: praescientia et
<lb ed="#Q"/>praesens iniquitas et poena futura<!--10-->. Cum ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>invenitur in auctoritatibus Sanctorum<!--11--> quod prae<lb ed="#Q"/>destinatio
vel reprobatio sit ex meritis, respon<lb ed="#Q"/>dendum<!--f-->
quod si hoc dicatur quantum ad prin<lb ed="#Q"/>cipale
significatum, sic non sunt ex meritis; si<!--g-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>quantum ad connotatum, sic sunt ex meritis, sed
<lb ed="#Q"/>differenter ex parte praedestinationis et reproba<lb ed="#Q"/>tionis.
Nam ex parte praedestinationis nec<!--h--> prin<lb ed="#Q"/>cipale
significatum<!--i--> est ex meritis, nec etiam
<lb ed="#Q"/>primum connotatum, quod est <mentioned>infusio gratiae</mentioned>,
<pb ed="#Q" n="323"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>sed <mentioned>collatio gloriae</mentioned> ex meritis est. Ex parte au<lb ed="#Q"/>tem
reprobationis aliter est: nam principale si<lb ed="#Q"/>gnificatum
est <mentioned>praescientia<!--a--> et praeparatio</mentioned>, con<lb ed="#Q"/>notatum
<mentioned>praesens iniquitas et futura poena</mentioned>. Patet probatus », vel iuste etc.: dicendum, secundum 71
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo quod reprobatio quantum ad principale si<lb ed="#Q"/>gnificatum quod supra 3, quod notatur iustitia non respectu
non est ex meritis, sed quantum ad
connotata potest dici quod est ex meritis. Si
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo inveniantur auctoritates quae dicant quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>praedestinatio et reprobatio sint ex meritis, non
<lb ed="#Q"/>est referendum ad principale significatum, sed
<lb ed="#Q"/>ad connotatum, sed differenter in praedestinatione
<lb ed="#Q"/>et reprobatione, ut dictum est<!--1-->.
[Ad obiecta]: 1. Ad illud ergo quod<!--b--> obi<lb ed="#Q"/>citur
<mentioned>iste potest facere quod habeat gratiam Dei</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicendum quod hoc intelligitur sic: quod potest
<lb ed="#Q"/>facere aliquid, quo facto, habeat gratiam, sicut
<lb ed="#Q"/>iste aperiendo fenestram facit quod illuminetur
<lb ed="#Q"/>domus, non quod eam illuminet, sed quia aliquid non causam.
<lb ed="#Q"/>facit, quo facto, illuminatur 2; eodem etiam e sensu 4. Item, ad illud quod « voluntas venit de'
<lb ed="#Q"/>intelligitur 'potest etiam facere, quod perseveret occultissimis meritis » etc.: respondeo quod 'de'
<lb ed="#Q"/>in gratia '. Nec ex hoc sequitur quod hic sit potest dicere .causam originalem, et sic falsa;
<lb ed="#Q"/>praedestinatus, quia primae sunt impropriae, sed vel materialem, et sic vera. Unde per hoc signi<lb ed="#Q"/>ultima
nullo modo est vera: nam habere gratiam ticatur quod reprobationis effectus quasi mate<lb ed="#Q"/>est
temporale, et ideo possumus aliquid facere rialis exigentia sint mala merita. '
<lb ed="#Q"/>antecedens ad gratiam; sed praedestinatio aeterna 5. Item '", ad illud Ambrosii: dicendum 4
[est], et ideo nihil possumus facere antecedens quod Ambrosius non vult dicere quod merita
<lb ed="#Q"/>ad illam. sint causa quare datur gratia, sed quod sint"
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3979">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item "', ad illud Rom. 9,13, in Glossa:
« Subtractio gratiae ex meritis est », ergo et re-
<lb ed="#Q"/>probatio ', patet solutio per praedicta. — Vele
<lb ed="#Q"/>potest dici quod subtractio gratiae non est causa
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>reprobationis; unde si ablativus-' causam notet,
<lb ed="#Q"/>falsa est; sed si notet concomitantiam, vera est.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e3995">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. item, ad illud: « Esau per iustitiam est" re<lb ed="#Q"/>probatus
», vel iuste etc.: dicendum, secundum"
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod supra 3, quod notatur iustitia non respectu
<lb ed="#Q"/>principalis signiiicati, sed respectu connotati. Ex<lb ed="#Q"/>ponatur
ergo quod dicitur ' Deus praeparat alicui
<lb ed="#Q"/>poenam aeternam ex meritis': quod dicitur 'ex
<lb ed="#Q"/>meritis' potest referri ad praeparationem abso<lb ed="#Q"/>lute,
et sic talsa ; vel in comparatione ad poenam
<lb ed="#Q"/>et sic vera, quia poena pro' meritis intligitur.
— Vei aliter: uno modo dicitur iustitia divina*
<lb ed="#Q"/>aequitas reddens unicuique quod suum est, alio
<lb ed="#Q"/>modo exigentia meritorum; primo modo sumitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>hic iustitia: ratio enim reprobationis est iustitia,
<lb ed="#Q"/>ratio praedestinationis est misericordia; habent
<lb ed="#Q"/>enim praedestinatio et reprobatio rationem, etsi
<lb ed="#Q"/>non causam.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e4031">
<lb ed="#Q"/>4. Item, ad illud quod cvoluntas venit de'
<lb ed="#Q"/>occultissimis meritis . etc.: respondeo quod ' de '
<lb ed="#Q"/>potest dicere .causam originalem, et sic taisa;
<lb ed="#Q"/>vel materialem, et sic vera. Unde per hoc signi<lb ed="#Q"/>ficatur
quod reprobationis etiectus quasi mate<lb ed="#Q"/>rialis
exigentia sint mala merita.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t1m3c1-d1e4047">
<lb ed="#Q"/>5. Item'", ad illud Ambrosii: dicendum4
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod Ambrosius non vult dicere quod merita
<lb ed="#Q"/>sint causa quare datur gratia, sed quod sint"
<lb ed="#Q"/>congruentia ut illi detur gratia; unde non posuit
<lb ed="#Q"/>verbum notans causam, sed congruentiam; unde
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicit": «Dabo ei gratiam, 'quem' scio ad me
<lb ed="#Q"/>reversurum -, non ' quia ' scio ad me reversurum.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>