-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4.xml
148 lines (147 loc) · 8.07 KB
/
ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 1, Inq. 1, Tract. 5, S. 2, Q. 4, T. 4, M. 1, C. 4</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-03-22">March 22, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-03-22" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="341"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-Hd1e3741">I, P. 1, Inq. 1, Tract. 5, S. 2, Q. 4, T. 4, M. 1, C. 4</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-Hd1e3744" type="question-title">QUID SIT DEUM DILIGERE CREATURAM.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-d1e3747">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Consequenter quaeritur quid sit dictu: Deum
<lb ed="#Q"/>diligere creaturam<!--2-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-d1e3754">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Videtur enim quod non sit aliud dicere quam
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deum diligere se ipsum: 1. Et loquamur de di<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/><lb ed="#Q"/>lectione
secundum quod praecessit omnem<!--y--> ef<lb ed="#Q"/>fectum,
secundum quod dicimus quod Deus di<lb ed="#Q"/>lexit
ab aeterno creaturas; loquamur ergo pro<!--z-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>illo statu ante mundi creationem: <mentioned>Deus diligit
<lb ed="#Q"/>creaturam</mentioned>, constat quod nullus Dei effectus est;
<pb ed="#Q" n="342"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>unde nihil est nisi ipse Deus; ergo, ut videtur,
<lb ed="#Q"/>nihil est diligibile nisi ipse; ergo pro illa dura<lb ed="#Q"/>tione<!--a-->
ante creationem rerum non videtur aliud
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicere <mentioned>Deum diligere creaturam</mentioned> quam <mentioned>Deum
<lb ed="#Q"/>diligere se ipsum</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-d1e3788">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item <name>Hugo</name><!--1-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-Qd1e3792">Ea est vis amoris quod ne<lb ed="#Q"/>cesse
est amantem talem esse quale est id quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>amat</quote>. Ergo si Deus diligeret creaturam in esse
<lb ed="#Q"/>proprio, necesse esset illum transformari in crea<lb ed="#Q"/>turam
vel in similitudinem creaturae; quod cum
<lb ed="#Q"/>sit impossibile, non diligit creaturam nisi secun<lb ed="#Q"/>dum
quod est in se ipso.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-d1e3810">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Item, si aliud connotatur, quaeritur quid sit
<lb ed="#Q"/>illud.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-d1e3817">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Solutio: Dicimus quod ab aeterno Deus dili<lb ed="#Q"/>gebat
creaturas, sicut ab aeterno cognoscebat an<lb ed="#Q"/>tequam
fierent, secundum illud <title>Eccli.</title> 23, 29: <quote>Do<lb ed="#Q"/>mino
Deo, antequam crearentur, omnia sunt 'co<lb ed="#Q"/>gnita</quote>.
Et sicut in Deo est ratio exemplaris om<lb ed="#Q"/>nium,
et haec erat quasi ratio cognitionis eius,
<lb ed="#Q"/>ita in ipso erat ratio causalis omnium, et haec
<lb ed="#Q"/>erat quasi ratio dilectionis eius. Cum ergo di<lb ed="#Q"/>citur
<mentioned>Deus diligebat creaturam ab aeterno</mentioned>, ul<lb ed="#Q"/>tra
hoc quod est <mentioned>Deum <!--b--> diligere se</mentioned> connotatur
<lb ed="#Q"/>creaturas esse in Deo per rationem causae. Unde
<lb ed="#Q"/>hoc quod est<!--c--> <mentioned>Deum diligere creaturam</mentioned> po<lb ed="#Q"/>test
sic intelligi: id est Deum diligere creaturam
<lb ed="#Q"/>in se ipso, et sic fuit ab aeterno, vel Deum
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>diligere se in creatura, vel etiam creaturam in se
<lb ed="#Q"/>ipsa<!--d-->, et haec dilectio est cum tempore vel in
<lb ed="#Q"/>tempore. Nota tamen quod aliter est de<!--c--> cogni<lb ed="#Q"/>tione
Dei et dilectione Dei ab aeterno, quia ipse
<lb ed="#Q"/>novit ab aeterno tam bona quam mala simplici
<lb ed="#Q"/>notitia<!--2-->, sed dilexit tantum bona, quia tantum
<lb ed="#Q"/>bonorum ipse est causa.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-d1e3869">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Per hoc patet solutio ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>primum obiectum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-d1e3876">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad secundum dicimus quod illa aucto<lb ed="#Q"/>ritas
<name>Hugonis</name>: <quote>Ea est vis amoris</quote> etc. pro<lb ed="#Q"/>prie
intelligitur, ubi amans est minus nobile amato
<lb ed="#Q"/>vel simpliciter vel secundum quid, sicut est in
<lb ed="#Q"/>hominibus. Aliquis enim homo amans aliquid<!--g-->,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quamvis sit minus nobile simpliciter, sicut est
<lb ed="#Q"/>nummus vel aliquid tale, tamen in eo quod illud
<lb ed="#Q"/>affectat<!--h--> et circa illud afficitur, subponit se<!--i--> ip<lb ed="#Q"/>sum
amato, et sic quodammodo<!--k--> transformatur
<lb ed="#Q"/>in illud. Sic autem non est in Deo; unde non
<lb ed="#Q"/>oportet quod transformetur in amatum. — Vel
<lb ed="#Q"/>aliter potest dici quod verbum <name>Hugonis</name> intel<lb ed="#Q"/>ligitur
de dilectione quae est affectio, non de illa
<lb ed="#Q"/>quae est voluntas boni, qualis est dilectio Dei;
<lb ed="#Q"/>amor enim qui<!--l--> est affectio, transformat quo<lb ed="#Q"/>dammodo
amantem in amatum<!--3-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i1t5s2q4t4m1c4-d1e3913">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Ad illud quod quaeritur de connotato, iam
<lb ed="#Q"/>patet responsio<!--4-->, quia connotatum est causalitas
<lb ed="#Q"/>in Deo respectu creaturae.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>