-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1.xml
170 lines (168 loc) · 9.22 KB
/
ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 1, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 3, C. 1</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-04-07">April 07, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/develop/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-04-07" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="458"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-Hd1e3741">I, P. 1, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 3, C. 1</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-Hd1e3744" type="question-title">AN SIT PONERE NUMERUM IN DIVINIS PERSONIS.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3776">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quantum ad primum sic proceditur et quaeritur
<lb ed="#Q"/>utrum in divinis personis sit numerus.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3783">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad quod sic: 1. <name>Dionysius</name>, in libro <title>De divinis
<lb ed="#Q"/>nominibus</title><!--4-->, loquens de Deo, dicit: <quote>ipsum est
<lb ed="#Q"/>principium et causa et ordo et numerus, propter
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod unitas et supertrinitas<!--q--></quote>. Relinquitur igitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod in divino esse sive in divinis personis sit
<lb ed="#Q"/>numerus.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3801">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Secunda ratio. Cum sit substantia communi<lb ed="#Q"/>cabilis
et incommunicabilis, sive communis sub<lb ed="#Q"/>stantia
et propria, magis consequitur numerus
<pb ed="#Q" n="459"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>substantiam propriam quam communem. Si ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>divina essentia est ut substantia communis, per<lb ed="#Q"/>sona
ut substantia propria, magis consequitur nu<lb ed="#Q"/>merus
personam quam essentiam; si ergo plura<lb ed="#Q"/>litas
essentiarum faceret numerum in Deo, si esset
<lb ed="#Q"/>in eo, ergo multo magis pluralitas personarum,
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum ibi sit, facit numerum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3830">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad oppositum: a. <name>Boethius</name>, in libro <title>De
<lb ed="#Q"/>Trinitate</title><!--1-->: <quote>Verissime unum est in quo est nul<lb ed="#Q"/>lus
numerus</quote>. Ergo, cum divinum esse sit<!--a--> ve<lb ed="#Q"/>rissime
unum, in ipso nullus est numerus; in
<lb ed="#Q"/>divinis ergo personis non est numerus<!--b-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3843">
<lb ed="#Q"/>b. Secunda ratio. <name>Ambrosius</name>, in libro <title>De
<lb ed="#Q"/>Trinitate</title><!--2-->: <quote>In Deo nunquam totalitatem poni<lb ed="#Q"/>mus,
quia nec numerus nec quantitas est ibi </quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3852">
<lb ed="#Q"/>c. Tertia ratio. Non constituitur numerus nisi
<lb ed="#Q"/>ex unitatibus<!--c--> differentium substantiarum<!--3-->. Unde
<lb ed="#Q"/>ex unitate humanitatis et unitate quantitatis et
<lb ed="#Q"/>unitate qualitatis non constituitur numerus in
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sorte<!--4-->, cum ipse sit homo et quantus et qualis,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia non est differentia substantialis istarum uni<lb ed="#Q"/>tatum,
immo sunt unum in subiecto, quod est
<lb ed="#Q"/>substantia: et ideo unum numero est Sortes et
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sortes quantus et Sortes qualis; sed ex Sorte et
<lb ed="#Q"/>Platone constituitur numerus, quia sunt unitates
<lb ed="#Q"/>differentium<!--d--> substantiarum. Si ergo unitates per<lb ed="#Q"/>sonales
in divino esse non sunt differentium<!--e--> sub<lb ed="#Q"/>stantiarum,
ergo non faciunt in divino esse nu<lb ed="#Q"/>merum;
in Deo ergo non est numerus.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3886">
<lb ed="#Q"/>d. Quarta ratio<!--f-->. Si quaeratur quare Sortes et
<lb ed="#Q"/>Plato sunt duo homines, ratio assignabitur, quia
<lb ed="#Q"/>duae humanitates ipsorum vel quia forma sub<lb ed="#Q"/>stantialis
multiplicatur in eis; sed si haec est
<lb ed="#Q"/>causa, ergo ubi non erit forma substantialis mul<lb ed="#Q"/>tiplicata,
non erit numerus; sed una est forma
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>substantialis, non multiplicata, in divinis personis;
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo ibi non est numerus. Et hoc est quod dicit
<lb ed="#Q"/><name>Boethius</name>, et exinde trahitur regula Theologo<lb ed="#Q"/>rum<!--5-->:
Non habet locum distinctio ubi ex diversis
<lb ed="#Q"/>causis non est unio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3915">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Solutio: Dicendum quod in divinis personis
<lb ed="#Q"/>non est numerus simpliciter et proprie, quia non
<lb ed="#Q"/>est ibi differentia secundum substantiam, sed est
<lb ed="#Q"/>ibi ut numerus; et istud videbitur postea<!--6--> ple<lb ed="#Q"/>nius.
Unde est ibi numerus cum additione et non
<lb ed="#Q"/>simpliciter, ut scilicet dicatur numerus persona<lb ed="#Q"/>rum
sive relationum aut numerus Trinitatis. Et
<lb ed="#Q"/>rationes quae ostendunt quod non sit ibi numerus,
<lb ed="#Q"/>procedunt de numero simpliciter, qui est ex uni<lb ed="#Q"/>tatibus
differentibus secundum substantiam; ra<lb ed="#Q"/>tiones
aliae secundum alium numerum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3941">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Ad primum tamen dicen<lb ed="#Q"/>dum,
ut intelligatur quid intendit dicere <name>Diony<lb ed="#Q"/>sius</name>,
quod sicut dicit <name>Boethius</name>, in libro <title>De
<lb ed="#Q"/>Trinitate</title><!--7-->, duplex est numerus, scilicet numerus<!--g-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>numerans et numerus numeratus. Deus autem<!--h-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>non dicitur numerus numeratus, sed numerus nu<lb ed="#Q"/>merans,
quia ipse dinumerat omnia; unde dicitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>numerus per causam.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q3c1-d1e3961">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad secundum concedendum quod non
<lb ed="#Q"/>sequitur quod<!--i--> si pluralitas essentiarum in Deo,
<lb ed="#Q"/>si ibi esset, faceret numerum simpliciter, quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>propter hoc pluralitas personarum: quia numerus
<lb ed="#Q"/>simpliciter exigit unitates differentes secundum
<lb ed="#Q"/>substantiam, quod ibi esset, si esset pluralitas es<lb ed="#Q"/>sentiarum,
non tamen est<!--k--> cum pluralitate perso<lb ed="#Q"/>narum,
immo est ibi omnimoda<!--l--> unitas essentialis,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et ideo non faciunt personae divinae numerum
<lb ed="#Q"/>simpliciter, sed numerum cum determinatione vel
<lb ed="#Q"/>additione; et<!--m--> hoc deberet ratio concludere.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>