-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4.xml
185 lines (184 loc) · 10.2 KB
/
ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 1, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 4, C. 4</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-04-08">April 08, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-04-08" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="474"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-Hd1e115">I, P. 1, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 4, C. 4</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-Hd1e118" type="question-title">AN POSSINT ESSE PLURES PERSONAE SINE ORIGINE.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e121">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quarto quaeritur an possint esse plures per<lb ed="#Q"/>sonae
sine origine.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e128">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad quod sic: a. <name>Hilarius</name><!--4-->: <quote>Si sunt duo
<lb ed="#Q"/>innascibiles, ergo duo dii</quote>. Sed si<!--t--> sunt duae
<lb ed="#Q"/>personae sine origine, sunt duo innascibiles; ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>duo dii: quod est inconveniens. — Quod au<lb ed="#Q"/>tem
istud sequatur, patet: nam si sunt
<lb ed="#Q"/>duae<!--u--> sine origine, omnis differentia, quae potest
<lb ed="#Q"/>ibi esse, aut est secundum essentiam aut secundum
<lb ed="#Q"/>modum essendi. Constat autem<!--v--> quod dicendo
<lb ed="#Q"/>duas sine origine ponitur in eis indifferentia
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>secundum modum essendi; ergo non differunt
<lb ed="#Q"/>secundum essendi modum. Si ergo differunt,
<lb ed="#Q"/>esse divinum est in illis differens; sed sunt duae;
<lb ed="#Q"/>sequitur ergo<!--x--> quod sint duo dii: quod est im<lb ed="#Q"/>possibile.
Est igitur in divinis impossibile plures
<lb ed="#Q"/>esse personas sine origine.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e165">
<lb ed="#Q"/>b. Secunda ratio. Iuxta <name>Richardum</name>, in libro
<lb ed="#Q"/><title>De Trinitate</title><!--5-->: <quote>Omnis<!--y--> differentia personalis
<lb ed="#Q"/>aut est secundum qualitatem substantialem aut<!--z-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>secundum originem</quote>. Si ergo hae duae personae
<lb ed="#Q"/>differunt, aut differunt sic vel sic; sed non dif<lb ed="#Q"/>ferunt
secundum originem, ut planum est; ergo
<pb ed="#Q" n="475"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>si differunt, diifferunt secundum qualitatem sub<lb ed="#Q"/>stantialem;
ergo alia est deitas in una et alia
<lb ed="#Q"/>in alia; ergo duo dii: quod est impossibile. —
<lb ed="#Q"/>Si dicatur quod differunt secundum existendi
<lb ed="#Q"/>modum, in hoc scilicet quod una illarum est a
<lb ed="#Q"/>qua est<!--a--> alia persona, alia vero a qua est nulla
— contra: si est ibi persona sine origine a qua
<lb ed="#Q"/>nulla alia, iam ipsa est<!--b--> solitaria; sed solitudo
<lb ed="#Q"/>non potest stare cum summa caritate<!--1-->, quae qui<lb ed="#Q"/>dem
est in divinis personis; relinquitur ergo quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>non differt ab alia sine origine in modo existendi,
<lb ed="#Q"/>sed in esse. Sequitur ergo quod<!--c--> si sunt duo in<lb ed="#Q"/>nascibiles,
quod sunt duo dii.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e212">
<lb ed="#Q"/>c. Tertia ratio. Omnis pluralitas habet unitatem<!--d-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>aliquam primam sui generis<!--2-->; ergo pluralitas per<lb ed="#Q"/>sonalis
habet aliquam primam<!--e--> unitatem persona<lb ed="#Q"/>lem;
sed si ponerentur duae personae sine origine,
<lb ed="#Q"/>poneretur pluralitas quae non habet ante se unita<lb ed="#Q"/>tem
sui generis: quod est inconveniens; est igitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>inconveniens<!--f--> duas esse personas sine origine.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e230">
<lb ed="#Q"/>d. Quarta ratio. Sicut se habet pluralitas es<lb ed="#Q"/>sentiae
ad unitatem essentiae, ita se habet plura<lb ed="#Q"/>litas
personae ad unitatem personae; sed omnis
<lb ed="#Q"/>pluralitas essentiae habet unam solam primam
<lb ed="#Q"/>essentiam a qua est; ergo et omnis pluralitas
<lb ed="#Q"/>personae habet unam solam primam personam<!--g-->:
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod non potest esse, si sint duae sine origine.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e248">
<lb ed="#Q"/>e. Quinta ratio. <name>Richardus</name>, in libro <title>De Tri<lb ed="#Q"/>nitate</title><!--3-->:
Si duae essent sine origine, neutra <quote>al<lb ed="#Q"/>teri
immediate adhaereret</quote>; non esset ergo summa
<lb ed="#Q"/>connexio et germanitas in personis divinis; etsi
<lb ed="#Q"/>etiam haberent ordinem ad tertiam quae ab illis
<lb ed="#Q"/>procederet, non tamen una<!--h--> ad aliam ordinem ha<lb ed="#Q"/>beret;
non igitur esset summa germanitas, summa
<lb ed="#Q"/>concordia, summa ordinatio in personis divinis:
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod est inconveniens.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e270">
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>f. Sexta ratio. Persona est substantia cum pro<lb ed="#Q"/>prietate
incommunicabili<!--4-->; sed si essent duae
<lb ed="#Q"/>personae sine origine, esset earum communis pro<lb ed="#Q"/>prietas
et non differens, scilicet innascibilitas;
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo non possent esse duae, sed una.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e283">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sic igitur patet quod impossibile est esse plu<lb ed="#Q"/>res<!--i-->
personas in divinis sine origine<!--k-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e290">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad oppositum: 1. Non est<!--l--> inconveniens ibi
<lb ed="#Q"/>ponere duas habentes originem; ergo non est in<lb ed="#Q"/>conveniens
duas aut plures ponere sine origine;
<lb ed="#Q"/>poneremus ergo adhuc ordinem harum ad invicem,
<lb ed="#Q"/>licet essent sine origine, sicut ponimus ordinem
<lb ed="#Q"/>illarum quae habent originem: nam si non distin<lb ed="#Q"/>guitur
ordo in istis, ergo nec in illis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e309">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Solutio: Dicendum quod impossibile est in di<lb ed="#Q"/>vinis
esse plures personas sine origine, sed unam
<lb ed="#Q"/>solam oportet esse sine origine<!--m-->, sicut patet per
<lb ed="#Q"/>rationes supra positas.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p1i2t1q4c4-d1e320">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Ad rationem in contrarium
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicendum quod <mentioned>habere originem</mentioned>, dictum de dua<lb ed="#Q"/>bus
personis, potest esse dupliciter: aut quod ita
<lb ed="#Q"/>habent originem ab una quod neutra ab alia aut ita
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod una habet originem ab alia. Primo modo, po<lb ed="#Q"/>sitis
duabus personis<!--n--> habentibus originem ab una,
<lb ed="#Q"/>dico quod destrueretur summus ordo et connexio in
<lb ed="#Q"/>divinis personis, immo maior esset earum connexio
<lb ed="#Q"/>ad tertiam quam ad invicem, et ita<!--o--> non esset in eis
<lb ed="#Q"/>summa proportio, sed confunderetur summa ger<lb ed="#Q"/>manitas;
et ideo hoc modo non est possibile eas
<lb ed="#Q"/>poni in divinis. Sed secundo modo, positis duabus
<lb ed="#Q"/>habentibus originem ab una, dico quod ponitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>summa connexio earum ad<!--p--> invicem et ad ter<lb ed="#Q"/>tiam,
et ideo summa ordinatio et summa originis
<lb ed="#Q"/>ratio; sed si ponerentur duae sine origine, nulla
<lb ed="#Q"/>poneretur in eis connexio nullaque originis ratio,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et ideo non possunt esse duae sine origine.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>