-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2.xml
602 lines (600 loc) · 39.6 KB
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 2, M. 3, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-04-19">April 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-04-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="537"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e118">I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 2, M. 3, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e121" type="question-title">UBERIUS EXPONITUR QUOD HOC NOMEN <mentioned>DEUS</mentioned> SUPPONAT ETIAM PRO PERSONA.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e124">
<pb ed="#Q" n="537"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Circa secundam opinionem, quam tenemus, quae<lb ed="#Q"/>ritur<!--a-->
multipliciter:
<lb ed="#Q"/>Primo, an sequatur: <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum, ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>se vel alium</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>secundo, an haec sit vera <mentioned>Deus genuit alium
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deum</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>tertio, utrum haec<!--b--> sit concedenda <mentioned>Deus<!--c--> ge<lb ed="#Q"/>nuit
se</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>quarto, an sequatur: <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum, ergo
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>genuit Deum qui est Pater vel Deum qui non
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Pater</mentioned>.
<lb ed="#Q"/>quinto, an haec sit concedenda <mentioned>Deus generat
<lb ed="#Q"/>et ille non generatur</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>sexto, an haec sit vera <mentioned>Deus generat et ille
<lb ed="#Q"/>non est Trinitas</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>septimo, an sicut haec est vera <mentioned>Trinitas est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus</mentioned>, conversa sit vera <mentioned>Deus est<!--d--> Trinitas</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quam negavit <name>Porretanus</name>.
</p>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Dd1e177" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e179">ARTICULUS I</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e182" type="question-title">An sequatur: <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum, ergo se vel alium</mentioned><!--1-->.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e185">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quantum ad primum arguitur: a. Si sequitur<!--e-->:
<mentioned>Deus genuit Deum, ergo se vel alium</mentioned>, da alte<lb ed="#Q"/>ram
partem. Si alium, ergo non est<!--f--> tantum unus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus; si se ipsum Deum, ergo idem generat se
<lb ed="#Q"/>ipsum<!--g-->: quorum utrumque est falsum. Aut igitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>prima erit falsa <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum</mentioned> aut non se<lb ed="#Q"/>quetur:
<mentioned>Deus genuit Deum<!--h-->, ergo se vel alium</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e201">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: 1. Bene sequitur: <mentioned>homo generat homi<lb ed="#Q"/>nem,
ergo se vel alium hominem</mentioned><!--i-->; ergo eadem
<lb ed="#Q"/>ratione dicetur <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum, ergo se vel
<lb ed="#Q"/>alium Deum</mentioned><!--k-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e212">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Praeterea, idem et diversum<!--l--> dividunt ens
<lb ed="#Q"/>immediate<!--2-->; ergo si Deus genuit Deum, genuit
<lb ed="#Q"/>eumdem<!--m--> vel diversum Deum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e222">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo: 1. Quaedam nomina divina signi<lb ed="#Q"/>ficant
essentiam, quaedam relationem; item, quae<lb ed="#Q"/>dam
essentialia significant<!--n--> per modum abstrac<lb ed="#Q"/>tionis,
ut <mentioned>deitas, essentia, substantia</mentioned>, quaedam
<lb ed="#Q"/>per modum concretionis, ut <mentioned>Deus</mentioned>, quod signi<lb ed="#Q"/>ficat
divinam essentiam ut est in habente illam<!--3-->:
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>unde habet significare divinam naturam et sup<lb ed="#Q"/>ponere
personam. Cum ergo dico <mentioned>Deus genuit
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deum</mentioned>, haec est vera, quia Pater, qui habet deita<lb ed="#Q"/>tem,
genuit Filium, qui habet deitatem; et non
<lb ed="#Q"/>sequitur: <mentioned>ergo se Deum<!--o--> vel alium Deum</mentioned><!--p-->:
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia enim alia est persona generantis, alia ge<lb ed="#Q"/>niti,
non potest habere locum relativum identi<lb ed="#Q"/>tatis<!--4-->
nec propter identitatem naturae relativum
<lb ed="#Q"/>diversitatis. Quia ergo, cum dicitur <mentioned>Deus genuit
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deum</mentioned>, in parte significatur idem ratione naturae
<lb ed="#Q"/>quam significat hoc nomen <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> et in parte di<lb ed="#Q"/>versum
ratione personae quam supponit hoc no<lb ed="#Q"/>men
<mentioned>Deus</mentioned>, non potest inferri simpliciter idem
<lb ed="#Q"/>nec simpliciter diversum, immo est ibi fallacia se<lb ed="#Q"/>cundum
quid et simpliciter.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e270">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad illud autem quod<!--q--> obicitur quod <mentioned>idem
<lb ed="#Q"/>et diversum condividunt ens</mentioned>: dicendum quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>verum est quod<!--r--> res eaedem sunt vel diversae,
<lb ed="#Q"/>sed nos possumus significare in parte idem et in
<lb ed="#Q"/>parte diversum, ut patet in parte et toto.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Dd1e284" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e286">ARTICULUS II</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e289" type="question-title">An haec sit vera <mentioned>Deus genuit alium Deum</mentioned>.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e292">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Secundo<!--s--> quaeritur an haec sit vera <mentioned>Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>genuit alium Deum</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e299">
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quod videtur: 1. Videtur enim<!--t--> sequi: <mentioned>Pater
<lb ed="#Q"/>genuit alium, qui est Deus, ergo alium Deum</mentioned><!--5-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e306">
<pb ed="#Q" n="538"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Praeterea, iste terminus <mentioned>alium</mentioned> personale
<lb ed="#Q"/>est et non essentiale; sed hoc verbum <mentioned>genuit</mentioned>
<lb ed="#Q"/>personale est; ergo per ipsum trahitur terminus
<lb ed="#Q"/>essentialis ad supponendum pro personis, cum
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum</mentioned>, et notatur ibi di<lb ed="#Q"/>stinctio
personalis; quare similiter<!--a--> debet trahi
<lb ed="#Q"/>per istum terminum <mentioned>alium</mentioned> et ita haec erit vera
<mentioned>Deus genuit alium Deum</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e329">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeob: 1. Ad primum secundum hanc
<lb ed="#Q"/>regulam<!--1-->: non habet locum distinctio ubi non est
<lb ed="#Q"/>ex diversis causis unio. Verbi gratia, humanitas
<lb ed="#Q"/>est in Sorte et<!--c--> Platone ex diversis causis; unde
<lb ed="#Q"/>possum dicere quod Sortes est alius homo a Pla<lb ed="#Q"/>tone,
quia alia est ratio qua Sortes est homo et
<lb ed="#Q"/>alia qua Plato est homo<!--d-->, quia alia est<!--e--> huma<lb ed="#Q"/>nitas
Sortis, alia humanitas<!--f--> Platonis. In divinis
<lb ed="#Q"/>autem non sic, quia Pater est Deus et Filius est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus eadem divinitate; una ergo est causa et
<lb ed="#Q"/>ratio qua Pater est Deus et Filius Deus. Unio
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo in hoc nomine <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> non est ex diversis
<lb ed="#Q"/>causis, immo ex una, et ideo non habet locum
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>ibi distinctio. Quando ergo<!--g--> obicitur: <mentioned>alius a
<lb ed="#Q"/>Patre est genitus et ille est Deus, ergo alius
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus a Patre<!--h--> est genitus a Patre</mentioned><!--i-->, non se<lb ed="#Q"/>quitur,
quia in prima solum dicitur diversitas
<lb ed="#Q"/>personalis, in conclusione vero ponitur diversi<lb ed="#Q"/>tas
personalis et essentialis et est commutatio
<lb ed="#Q"/>praedicamenti a praedicamento relationis in prae<lb ed="#Q"/>dicamentum
substantiae. Immo ad hoc quod va<lb ed="#Q"/>leat,
ita oporteret inferre: <mentioned>alius a Patre est ge<lb ed="#Q"/>nitus,
et ille est Deus alia deitate<!--k--> quam Pater,
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo alius Deus a Patre est genitus</mentioned>; sed media
<lb ed="#Q"/>falsa est.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e386">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad aliud dicendum quod cum aliquod
<lb ed="#Q"/>commune trahitur ad personam, debet trahi per
<lb ed="#Q"/>aliquid quod sit personale et proprium, non per
<lb ed="#Q"/>aliquod personale infinite; ergo hoc<!--l--> verbum <mentioned>gi<lb ed="#Q"/>gnere</mentioned><!--m-->,
cum determinet proprietatem qua una
<lb ed="#Q"/>persona distinguitur<!--n--> ab alia, potest trahere ter<lb ed="#Q"/>minum
essentialem ad certam personam: quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>non potest iste terminus <mentioned>alius</mentioned>, quia<!--o--> non de<lb ed="#Q"/>terminat
proprietatem personalem finite<!--p-->.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Dd1e408" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e410">ARTICULUS III</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e413" type="question-title">Utrum haec sit concedenda <mentioned>Pater genuit se</mentioned>.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e416">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Tertio quaeritur utrum haec sit concedenda
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Pater genuit se</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e421">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quod. videtur dicere 1. <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, in qua<lb ed="#Q"/>dam
homilia <title>Super Ioannem</title><!--2-->, quod <quote>Pater, mit<lb ed="#Q"/>tens
Filium, se alterum misit</quote>. Quare misit se<!--a-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e430">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, <name>Augustinus</name>, <title>Ad Maximinum</title><!--3-->: <quote>Ge<lb ed="#Q"/>nuit
de se alterum se</quote>. Ergo<!--b--> genuit se.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e438">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Item, <ref><name ref="#Anselm">Anselmus</name>, in <title ref="#Proslogion">Proslogion</title><!--4--></ref>: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Qd1e447">Cum
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur Deus de Deo, Filius de Patre, non intel<lb ed="#Q"/>ligimus
alium Deum, sed eumdem Deum de se
<lb ed="#Q"/>ipso; ergo Deus eumdem Deum genuit</quote>. Quare
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus genuit se.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e459">
<lb ed="#Q"/>4. Item, <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, XV <title>De Trinitate</title><!--5-->:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Tamquam se ipsum dicens Pater Verbum<!--c--> ge<lb ed="#Q"/>nuit
sibi per omnia coaequale; non enim se in<lb ed="#Q"/>tegre
perfecteque<!--d--> dixisset, si amplius vel minus
<lb ed="#Q"/>esset in Verbo<!--e--> quam in se ipso</quote>. Sed dicere
<lb ed="#Q"/>Dei gignere est<!--f-->; unde in <title>Psalmo</title><!--6-->: <quote>Semel lo<lb ed="#Q"/>cutus
est Deus<!--g--></quote>, <title>Glossa</title><!--7-->: <quote>Loqui Dei est ae<lb ed="#Q"/>ternaliter<!--h-->
Verbum generare<!--i--></quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e479">
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo: 4. Hoc verbum <mentioned>dicere</mentioned> non sumi<lb ed="#Q"/>tur
ibi notionaliter, sed essentialiter; unde sensus
<lb ed="#Q"/>est <quote>Non se perfecte dixisset</quote>, id est manifestas<lb ed="#Q"/>set,
quia non sufficienter declaratur potentia Patris
<lb ed="#Q"/>in creatione creaturarum nec ostenditur usque ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>summum, sed tota ostenditur quando totam poten<lb ed="#Q"/>tiam
communicat, hoc est quando<!--k--> generat talem
<lb ed="#Q"/>qualis<!--l--> est et quantus est; per generationem ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>declaratur summitas potentiae Patris, <title>Isai.</title> 66, 9:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Numquid qui<!--m--> alios parere facio, sterilis ero?</quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e505">
<lb ed="#Q"/>1-2. Ad alia prima<!--n--> duo posset dici quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>hoc relativum <mentioned>se</mentioned> non significat terminum huius
<lb ed="#Q"/>verbi <mentioned>genuit</mentioned>, sed potius terminum alteritatis si<lb ed="#Q"/>gnificatae
per hoc nomen <mentioned>alterum</mentioned>. — Vel ali<lb ed="#Q"/>ter
potest dici quod sicut commune per additionem
<lb ed="#Q"/>coarctatur, ita quod personale est per aliquod
<lb ed="#Q"/>additum potest fieri commune, ut cum dicitur
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>omnis Aristomenes intelligibilis<!--o-->, omnis Micca<lb ed="#Q"/>lus<!--p-->
musicus</mentioned><!--8-->. Similiter hoc relativum <mentioned>se</mentioned>, quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>reciprocum est et personam discretam iterat<!--q-->,
<lb ed="#Q"/>per hunc terminum <mentioned>alterum</mentioned> sibi adiunctum fit
<pb ed="#Q" n="539"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>essentiale et commune et extrahitur a ratione per<lb ed="#Q"/>sonalitatis,
et ideo non sequitur: <mentioned>genuit se alte<lb ed="#Q"/>rum,
ergo genuit se</mentioned>, sed est ibi a fallacia secun<lb ed="#Q"/>dum
quid et simpliciter.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e542">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Ad aliud <name ref="#Anselm">Anselmi</name> dicendum quod haec
<lb ed="#Q"/>est vera <mentioned>Pater genuit eumdem Deum de se ipso</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>sed hoc relativum <mentioned>se</mentioned>, quod est personale<!--b-->, non
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>est ex parte rei genitae, sed ex parte generantis;
<lb ed="#Q"/>sed iste terminus <mentioned>eumdem</mentioned> adiunctus termino
<lb ed="#Q"/>essentiali non sumitur personaliter, sicut nec iste
<lb ed="#Q"/>terminus <mentioned>alius</mentioned>, cum<!--c--> adiungitur termino essen<lb ed="#Q"/>tiali;
unde non iterabitur persona Patris nec<!--d-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>valet hoc argumentum: <mentioned>de se ipso genuit eumdem
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deum, ergo se Deum</mentioned>.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Dd1e569" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e571">ARTICULUS IV</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e574" type="question-title">An sequatur: <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum, ergo genuit Deum qui est Pater vel Deum qui non est Pater</mentioned>.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e577">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quarto quaeritur an sequatur<!--e-->: <mentioned>Deus genuit
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deum, ergo genuit Deum<!--f--> qui est Pater vel
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deum qui non est Pater</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e586">
<lb ed="#Q"/>1. Si genuit Deum qui non est Deus Pater, ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus est qui non est Deus Pater; non ergo tan<lb ed="#Q"/>tum
unus Deus est. Si genuit Deum qui est Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Pater, ergo Pater genuit se.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e595">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo, secundum <name>Magistrum</name>, in <title>Sen<lb ed="#Q"/>tentiis</title><!--1-->.
Negat enim hanc <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum
<lb ed="#Q"/>qui est Deus Pater</mentioned>, et distinguit hance <mentioned>ge<lb ed="#Q"/>nuit
Deum qui non est Deus Pater</mentioned>. Sicut cum
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur <mentioned>non est homo albus</mentioned>, hoc potest esse
<lb ed="#Q"/>vel quia non est homo vel quia non est albus:
<lb ed="#Q"/>similiter <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum qui non est Deus<!--h-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>Pater</mentioned>, hoc potest dici vel quia non est Deus, et
<lb ed="#Q"/>sic falsum, vel quia non est Pater, et sic verum. —
<lb ed="#Q"/>Tamen, secundum <name>Praepositinum</name><!--2-->, haec non
<lb ed="#Q"/>est concedenda <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum qui non est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Pater</mentioned>, quia aliter fit relatio in affirmativis, ali<lb ed="#Q"/>ter
in negativis: in affirmativis refertur supposi<lb ed="#Q"/>tum
tantum, in negativis suppositum et signifi<lb ed="#Q"/>catum;
unde exigeretur ad veritatem huius <mentioned>Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>genuit Deum qui non est Pater</mentioned> quod alia esset
<lb ed="#Q"/>persona Patris, alia Filii et<!--i--> alia divinitas, propter
<lb ed="#Q"/>relativum <mentioned>qui</mentioned>, quod refert suppositum et signi<lb ed="#Q"/>ficatum
huius nominis <mentioned>Deus</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e640">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Aliter potest dici et concedi ista <mentioned>Deus genuit
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deum qui non est Deus Pater</mentioned>, sed non sequi<lb ed="#Q"/>tur:
<mentioned>ergo est Deus qui non est Deus Pater</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quoniam in prima iste terminus <mentioned>Deum</mentioned>, propter
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>proprietatem significatam per hoc verbum <mentioned>ge<lb ed="#Q"/>nuit</mentioned>
distinguentem personas, tenebatur persona<lb ed="#Q"/>liter
et ideo relativum refert similiter. Sed in<!--k-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>conclusione, in hac<!--l--> scilicet <mentioned>ergo Deus est qui
<lb ed="#Q"/>non est Deus Pater</mentioned>, iste terminus <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> te<lb ed="#Q"/>netur
essentialiter et ideo relativum similiter.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e666">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Aliter potest dici quod haec est<!--m--> duplex <mentioned>Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>genuit Deum qui est Deus Pater vel<!--n--> qui non
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Deus Pater</mentioned>, quia<!--o--> hoc quod dico <mentioned>Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Pater</mentioned> potest teneri dictionaliter, ut sit circumlo<lb ed="#Q"/>cutio
unius personae — sicut hoc quod<!--p--> dico <mentioned>Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritus
Sanctus</mentioned>: cum tenetur dictionaliter<!--q-->, circum<lb ed="#Q"/>locutio
est unius personae - et hoc modo affir<lb ed="#Q"/>mativa
falsa, negativa vera. Vel potest esse oratio,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et<!--r--> hoc dupliciter, quia iste terminus <mentioned>Pater</mentioned>
<lb ed="#Q"/>potest esse praedicatum<!--s--> et iste terminus <mentioned>Deus</mentioned>
<lb ed="#Q"/>appositio vel e converso. Si primo modo<!--t-->, affir<lb ed="#Q"/>mative
dictum non potest attribui vere, negative
<lb ed="#Q"/>potest. Si secundo modo, adhuc dupliciter, quia
<lb ed="#Q"/>isti duo termini <mentioned>Deus, Pater</mentioned> vel possunt referri
<lb ed="#Q"/>ad subiectum, et sic affirmative dictum non con<lb ed="#Q"/>venit<!--u-->,
negative convenit; vel iste terminus <mentioned>Deus</mentioned>
<lb ed="#Q"/>tantum potest referri ad subiectum et iste ter<lb ed="#Q"/>minus
<mentioned>Pater</mentioned> ad hunc terminum <mentioned>Deum</mentioned>, ut
<lb ed="#Q"/>sit sensus: <mentioned>Deus genuit Deum qui est Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Pater</mentioned>, id est<!--v--> <mentioned>qui est Deus qui est Pater</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et hoc modo affirmative dictum convenit, ne<lb ed="#Q"/>gative
non convenit, quia relativum tenetur es<lb ed="#Q"/>sentialiter
eo quod refertur<!--x--> ad hunc terminum
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Deus</mentioned>, qui<!--y--> in praedicato positus tenetur es<lb ed="#Q"/>sentialiter.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Dd1e722" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e724">ARTICULUS V</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e727" type="question-title">An haec sit concedenda <mentioned>Deus generat et ille non generatur</mentioned>.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e730">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quinto quaeritur I. an haec sit concedenda
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Deus generat et ille non generatur</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e737">
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quod videtur<!--3-->: 1. <quote>Quia non est idem Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>qui generat et qui generatur<!--z-->: ergo Deus generat
<pb ed="#Q" n="540"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>et ipse non est Filius; ergo Deus est et ipse non
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Filius<!--a-->. Eadem ratione Deus non est Pater,
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus non est Spiritus Sanctus et eadem ratione
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus non est<!--b--> tres personae</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e759">
<lb ed="#Q"/>II. Item, quaeritur de hac propositione, cuius
<lb ed="#Q"/>quantitatis sit <mentioned>Deus spirat</mentioned>, et de ista similiter
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Deus generat vel generatur</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e767">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Videtur quod sit indefinita<!--c-->, quia hoc nomen
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Deus</mentioned> non supponit ibi magis pro Patre quam
<lb ed="#Q"/>pro Filio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e774">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Econtra videtur quod sit singularis, quia una et<!--d-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>singularis est significatio huius nominis <mentioned>Deus</mentioned><!--e-->,
<lb ed="#Q"/>scilicet <mentioned>deitas</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e783">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo<!--f--> I. secundum <name>Praepositinum</name>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicentem <quote>quod relativa dictio in negativis refert
<lb ed="#Q"/>significatum et suppositum, et nisi praedicatum<!--g-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>removeatur a supposito et significato, falsa est
<lb ed="#Q"/>propositio; si autem removeatur, vera. Unde haec
<lb ed="#Q"/>pro. vera conceditur <mentioned>Deus generat et ipse non ge<lb ed="#Q"/>neratur</mentioned>,
quia hoc relativum <mentioned>ipse</mentioned> refert personam
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Patris et divinam naturam; sed nec persona Pa<lb ed="#Q"/>tris
nec divina<!--h--> natura generatur<!--i-->. Haec autem
<lb ed="#Q"/>est falsa <mentioned>Deus generat et ipse non est Filius</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia hoc relativum <mentioned>ipse</mentioned> non tantum refert per<lb ed="#Q"/>sonam
Patris, sed deitatem; deitas autem est Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lius.
Ad hoc autem quod haec esset vera, opor<lb ed="#Q"/>teret
quod<!--k--> haec esset vera <mentioned>divina natura non
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Filius</mentioned></quote>. Unde in argumentatione est mutatio
<lb ed="#Q"/>praedicamenti ab abnegatione notionis, quae de<lb ed="#Q"/>signatur
cum dicitur<!--l--> <mentioned>non generat</mentioned>, ad abne<lb ed="#Q"/>gationem
personae quae designatur cum dicitur
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>non est Filius</mentioned>; sicut si diceretur <mentioned>divina es<lb ed="#Q"/>sentia
non generatur, ergo non est Filius</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e834">
<lb ed="#Q"/>II. <quote>Ad secundum dicimus quod haec propositio
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Deus generat vel generatur</mentioned> nec est singularis
<lb ed="#Q"/>nec<!--m--> indefinita, quia hoc nomen <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> nec
<lb ed="#Q"/>est proprium nec appellativum, sed aliquid habet
<lb ed="#Q"/>proprii, aliquid appellativi: habet enim significa<lb ed="#Q"/>tionem
proprii et suppositionem appellativi, et
<lb ed="#Q"/>ita illa propositio partim est singularis, partim
<lb ed="#Q"/>indefinita</quote>.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Dd1e853" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e855">ARTICULUS VI</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e858" type="question-title">An haec sit vera <mentioned>Deus est et ille non est Trinitas</mentioned>.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e861">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sexto quaeritur de hac <mentioned>Deus est et ille non
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Trinitas</mentioned><!--1-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e868">
<lb ed="#Q"/>a. Quia Pater est et ille non est Trinitas; et
<lb ed="#Q"/>Pater est Deus; ergo Deus est et ille non est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Trinitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e877">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: 1. Deus est et ille non est Trinitas;
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo Deus non est Trinitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e885">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, obicitur: Sequitur: <mentioned>Sortes non est Plato,
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo homo non est Plato</mentioned>; ergo simili ratione
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Pater non est Filius</mentioned>, et Pater est Deus, ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus non est Filius<!--' this quotation mark has no openiong quotation mark-->. Item, videtur sequi, quia
<lb ed="#Q"/>hoc nomen <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> supponit personam; sed de
<lb ed="#Q"/>alia persona est verum quoniam non est Filius,
<lb ed="#Q"/>ut de Patre; ergo erit<!--n--> verum <mentioned>Deus non est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filius</mentioned><!--o--> et pari ratione <mentioned>Deus non est Pater</mentioned>
<lb ed="#Q"/>et <mentioned>Deus non est Spiritus Sanctus</mentioned>; ergo Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>non est Trinitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e907">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo: 1. Secundum <name>Praepositinum</name><!--2-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>haec est falsa<!--p--> <mentioned>Deus<!--q--> est et ille non est Trinitas</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia relativum refert suppositum et significatum;
<lb ed="#Q"/>unde ad veritatem requireretur quod nec qui est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus esset Trinitas ut supposita persona<!--r-->, nec
<!-- </p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e920">-->
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod est Deus esset Trinitas: quod est falsum
<lb ed="#Q"/>pro hac parte <mentioned>non quod est Deus est Trinitas</mentioned><!--s-->.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Si autem arguat: <mentioned>Pater est et ille non est Tri<lb ed="#Q"/>nitas,
ergo Deus non est Trinitas</mentioned><!--t-->, mutatio est
<lb ed="#Q"/>praedicamenti a ratione dicendi <mentioned>qui estt</mentioned>, id est
<lb ed="#Q"/>personali, ad rationem dicendi <mentioned>quod est</mentioned>, id
<lb ed="#Q"/>est substantialem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e938">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Secundum alios<!--3--> conceditur ista <mentioned>Deus est
<lb ed="#Q"/>et ille non est Trinitas</mentioned>, quia <quote>propter naturam
<lb ed="#Q"/>pronominis, cuius<!--u--> proprium est pro proprio no<lb ed="#Q"/>mine
poni et certas significare personas, quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>dico <mentioned>ille</mentioned> pro unica et certa persona tenetur,
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum dicitur <mentioned>Deus est et ille non est Trinitas</mentioned></quote>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>haec autem<!--v--> falsa <mentioned>Deus non est Trinitas</mentioned>. Sed
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum arguit: <mentioned>ergo Deus non est Trinitas</mentioned>, non
<lb ed="#Q"/>sequitur, quia hic <quote>fit abnegatio pro qualibet
<lb ed="#Q"/>persona et etiam pro divina essentia</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e962">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad illud<!--x--> quod secundo obicitur: dicen<lb ed="#Q"/>dum<!--4-->
quod <quote>licet<!--y--> nomen <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> supponat pro
<lb ed="#Q"/>qualibet trium personarum, tamen quia supponit
<lb ed="#Q"/>pro eis indistincte — nisi addatur determinatio
<lb ed="#Q"/>personalis, ut generans, genitus vel procedens,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et pro una singulari deitate — negativa particula
<pb ed="#Q" n="541"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>addita removet<!--a--> pro quolibet supposito, tamquam
<lb ed="#Q"/>si negatio praeponeretur<!--b-->; unde aequipollent istae
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Deus non est Pater</mentioned> et <mentioned>non-Deus est Pater</mentioned></quote>.
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Patet igitur quod est mutatio praedicamenti in
<lb ed="#Q"/>praedictis argumentationibus a personali ratione
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicendi ad essentialem.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Dd1e996" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e998">ARTICULUS VII.</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-Hd1e1001" type="question-title">An haec sit vera <mentioned>Deus est Trinitas</mentioned>.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1004">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Septimo quaeritur an haec sit vera <mentioned>Deus est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Trinitas</mentioned>, quam negavit Porretanus<!--1-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1011">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Et videtur bene dicere 1. quia Pater non est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Trinitas, nec Filius nec Spiritus Sanctus, quare
<lb ed="#Q"/>nec Deus; sequitur enim: <mentioned>iste homo non currit
<lb ed="#Q"/>nec ille, ergo homo non currit</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1022">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, haec est falsa <mentioned>homo est omnis homo</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia iste terminus <mentioned>homo</mentioned>, positus in subiecto,
<lb ed="#Q"/>supponit personaliter; ergo cum dicitur <mentioned>Deus est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Trinitas</mentioned>, iste terminus <mentioned>Deus</mentioned>, positus in subiecto,
<lb ed="#Q"/>supponit personaliter, et hoc secundum quod dic<lb ed="#Q"/>tum
est<!--2--> quod significat essentiam personaliter;
<lb ed="#Q"/>sed hoc modo falsa est haec <mentioned>Deus est Trinitas</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1041">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Item, dicite <name>Boethius</name>, in libro <title>De Trinitate</title><!--3-->,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et <name>Augustinus</name><!--4--> similiter, quoniam quidquid de
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deo praedicatur, praedicatur secundum substan<lb ed="#Q"/>tiam
vel ad aliquid; sed hoc nomen <mentioned>Trinitas</mentioned> non
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicit <mentioned>ad aliquid</mentioned>; dicitur ergo secundum essen<lb ed="#Q"/>tiam;
sed secundum <name>Boethium</name><!--5--> et <name>Augusti<lb ed="#Q"/>num</name><!--6-->,
in eodem, quidquid praedicatur de Deo se<lb ed="#Q"/>cundum
essentiam, praedicatur de qualibet persona;
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum ergo hoc nomen <mentioned>Trinitas</mentioned> de nulla persona
<lb ed="#Q"/>vere dicatur, haec est falsa <mentioned>Deus est Trinitas</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1065">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: a. <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, I<!--d--> libro <title>De Tri<lb ed="#Q"/>nitate</title><!--7-->:
<quote>Recte ipse Deus Trinitas intelligitur</quote>.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ecce quod expresse dicit Deum esse Trinitatem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1074">
<lb ed="#Q"/>b. Item, <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name><!--8-->, in verbis illis Apo<lb ed="#Q"/>stoli,
<title>I Tim.</title> ultimo, 15: <quote>Beatus et solus potens</quote>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>id est <quote>unus et solus verus Deus, qui est ipsa
<lb ed="#Q"/>Trinitas</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1085">
<lb ed="#Q"/>c. Item, <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, in <title>sermone De fide</title><!--9-->:
<quote>Credimus unum Deum unam esse divini no<lb ed="#Q"/>minis
Trinitatem</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1092">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ex quibus auctoritatibus relinquitur quod Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>est<!--e--> Trinitas et Deus est tres personae sicut e
<lb ed="#Q"/>converso. — Quod concedendum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1101">
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1-2. Dicendum ergo quod per
<lb ed="#Q"/>hunc terminum <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> quandoque supponitur es<lb ed="#Q"/>sentia,
quandoque supponitur persona. Non enim
<lb ed="#Q"/>similiter se habet essentia significata per hoc no<lb ed="#Q"/>men
<mentioned>Deus</mentioned> ad personas, sicut se habet<!--f--> es<lb ed="#Q"/>sentia
significata per hoc nomen <mentioned>homo</mentioned> ad in<lb ed="#Q"/>dividua:
essentia enim significata per hoc nomen
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>homo</mentioned><!--g--> multiplicatur in individuis, essentia vero
<lb ed="#Q"/>significata per hoc nomen <mentioned>Deus</mentioned><!--h--> indivisa re<lb ed="#Q"/>manet
in personis. Dico ergo quod si essentia si<lb ed="#Q"/>gnificata
per hoc nomen <mentioned>homo</mentioned> esset indivisa
<lb ed="#Q"/>in individuis, haec esset vera <mentioned>homo est omnis
<lb ed="#Q"/>homo</mentioned>; ideo haec est vera <mentioned>Deus est Trinitas</mentioned>.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Unde differenter est in hoc termino<!--i--> <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> et
<lb ed="#Q"/>in hoc termino <mentioned>homo</mentioned>, quia <mentioned>homo</mentioned>, per se sup<lb ed="#Q"/>ponit
personaliter, ex adiuncto essentialiter, ut
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum dicitur <mentioned>homo est dignissima creaturarum</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>iste terminus <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> e converso ex se supponit
<lb ed="#Q"/>essentiam, ex adiuncto personam. Et in hoc fal<lb ed="#Q"/>lebatur
<name>Porretanus</name>, credens quod tantum sup<lb ed="#Q"/>poneret
essentiam cum<!--k--> praedicatur, ut hoc non,
<lb ed="#Q"/>ex se haberet, sed ex ratione praedicati.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1152">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Ad ultimum dicendum quod aliud est esse
<mentioned>ad aliquid</mentioned> secundum rem, aliud secundum no<lb ed="#Q"/>men
et dictionem. Dicendum ergo quod hoc nomen
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Trinitas</mentioned> non est <mentioned>ad aliquid</mentioned> secundum nomen
<lb ed="#Q"/>et dictionem, res tamen quae significatur <mentioned>ad ali<lb ed="#Q"/>quid</mentioned>
est; unde hoc nomen <mentioned>Trinitas</mentioned> significat
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>ad aliquid</mentioned><!--l--> per modum substantiae. Sicut ergo<!--m-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>accidit in aliquibus relationibus aliis quod ter-,
<lb ed="#Q"/>minantur intra et non extra, ita est in hoc no<lb ed="#Q"/>mine
<mentioned>Trinitas</mentioned>: in intellectu enim eius clauditur
<lb ed="#Q"/>non solum quod dicitur <mentioned>ad aliquid</mentioned>, sed illud,
<lb ed="#Q"/>ad quod<!--n--> dicitur.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q2m3c2-d1e1174">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Et in hunc modum terminatur Quaestio de no<lb ed="#Q"/>mine
operationis.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>