-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2.xml
171 lines (170 loc) · 9.96 KB
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 3, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-04-20">April 20, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-04-20" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="544"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-Hd1e118">I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 3, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-Hd1e121" type="question-title">UTRUM AFFIRMATIONES DE DEO DICANTUR VERE.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-d1e124">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Consequenter quaeritur utrum affirmationes de
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deo<!--u--> sint verae.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-d1e133">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad quod a. <name ref="#Dionysius">B. Dionysius</name><!--6-->: <quote>Affirmationes
<lb ed="#Q"/>dictae de Deo sunt incompactae, negationes ve<lb ed="#Q"/>rae</quote>.
Simpliciter ergo nomina positiva non vere
<lb ed="#Q"/>enuntiantur de Deo.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-d1e144">
<lb ed="#Q"/>b. Item, <name ref="#Dionysius">Dionysius</name> dicit omnium negationes
<lb ed="#Q"/>veras de Deo, in libro<!--v--> <title>De mystica Theologia</title><!--7-->,
<lb ed="#Q"/>hoc modo; <quote>Neque anima est neque intellectus,
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>neque phantasiam<!--x--> aut opinionem aut intellectum
<lb ed="#Q"/>aut intelligentiam habet, neque ratio est neque in<lb ed="#Q"/>teliigentia
neque dicitur neque intelligitur</quote>; et
<lb ed="#Q"/>sequitur: <quote>Neque habet virtutem neque virtus
<lb ed="#Q"/>est neque in neque vita</quote>; et sequitur<!--y-->: <quote>Ne<lb ed="#Q"/>que
lux neque sapientia neque deitas aut bo<lb ed="#Q"/>nitas
neque spiritus<!--z--> neque filiatio neque pater<lb ed="#Q"/>nitas</quote>.
Ex hoc videtur quod omnes affirmationes,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quae maxime attribuuntur Deo, sunt. simpliciter
<lb ed="#Q"/>falsae.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-d1e178">
<pb ed="#Q" n="545"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: 1. <name ref="#Dionysius">B. Dionysius</name>, in libro<!--a--> <title>De my<lb ed="#Q"/>stica
Theologia</title><!--1-->: <quote>Dicamus igitur quod omnium
<lb ed="#Q"/>causa et<!--b--> super omnia existens neque sine<!--c--> sub<lb ed="#Q"/>stantia
est neque sine vita neque sine ratione</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-d1e194">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, idem, in eodem<!--2-->: <quote>Diximus in libro
<lb ed="#Q"/>qui est<!--d--> <title>De divinis nominibus</title><!--3-->, quomodo opti<lb ed="#Q"/>mus
nominatur, quomodo ens, quomodo vita et
<lb ed="#Q"/>sapientia et virtus et quaecumque alia intelligi<lb ed="#Q"/>bilia<!--e-->
sunt divinae nominationis</quote>. Vere igitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>est ista de ipso affirmare.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-d1e210">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo, secundum Dionysium, in libro<!--f-->
<lb ed="#Q"/><title>De mystica Theologia</title><!--4-->: <quote>In ipso<!--g--> oportet omnes
<lb ed="#Q"/>existentium ponere et affirmare positiones veluti
<lb ed="#Q"/>omnium causa et omnes ipsas<!--h--> proprie negare
<lb ed="#Q"/>sicut super omnia existente et non opinari nega<lb ed="#Q"/>tiones
oppositas esse affirmationibus</quote>. Ex hoc<!--i-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>accipitur quod sunt verae affirmationes et nega<lb ed="#Q"/>tiones
omnium in divinis nec opponuntur affir<lb ed="#Q"/>mationes
negationibus. Nam affirmationes aut
<lb ed="#Q"/>accipiuntur symbolice aut mystice. Si symbolice,
<lb ed="#Q"/>accipiuntur per translationem, ut lapis, <title>Psalm.</title><!--5-->:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Lapidem, quem reprobaverunt</quote> etc.; et aer, in III
<lb ed="#Q"/>libro <title>Reg.</title><!--6-->: <quote>In sibilo aurae tenuis, ibi Dominus</quote>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>negationes vero <mentioned>non-lapis, non—aer</mentioned> accipiuntur
<lb ed="#Q"/>proprie. Sed mystice accipiuntur per superexcel<lb ed="#Q"/>lentiam
et perfectionem, quae est supra nos, ut
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>vita, bonitas</mentioned> et huiusmodi; unde <name ref="#Dionysius">Dionysius</name>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>in eodem<!--7-->: <quote>An non magis Deus est vita et bo<lb ed="#Q"/>nitas
quam aer et lapis?</quote> Negationes vero ac<lb ed="#Q"/>cipiuntur
secundum nos et nostram comprehen<lb ed="#Q"/>sionem
et ideo non opponuntur affirmationibus.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Unde <name ref="#Dionysius">Dionysius</name><!--8-->: <quote>Neque spiritus est, sicut
<lb ed="#Q"/>nos scimus, neque filiatio neque paternitas ne<lb ed="#Q"/>que
aliud cognitum a nobis neque est aliquid
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>non-existentium neque aliquid existentium<!--k--> ne<lb ed="#Q"/>que
existentia eum cognoscunt<!--l--></quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-d1e269">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Ad primo autem<!--m--> obiectum
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicendum quod<!--9--> <quote>quadruplex est compositio, sci<lb ed="#Q"/>licet
compositio partium, secundum quod corpus
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur compositum; et compositio proprietatis ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>subiectum, et secundum hoc anima dicitur com<lb ed="#Q"/>posita;
materia etiam dicitur composita, quia com<lb ed="#Q"/>ponitur
formae; quarto modo forma dicitur com<lb ed="#Q"/>posita,
quia componitur materiae. Item, per con<lb ed="#Q"/>trarium,
quadruplex est simplicitas; solus autem
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus dicitur proprie simplex, quia caret omni ge<lb ed="#Q"/>nere
compositionis. Item, notandum quod vocabula
<lb ed="#Q"/>quaedam significant proprietates in adiacentia vel
<lb ed="#Q"/>inhaerentia, quaedam in subsistentia, ut hoc no<lb ed="#Q"/>men
<mentioned>album</mentioned> significat albedinem<!--n--> in adiacentia,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia ostendit<!--o--> eam alii inesse; sed hoc vocabulum
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>albedo</mentioned> significat albedinem in subsistentia, quia
<lb ed="#Q"/>supponit eam; similiter hoc nomen <mentioned>homo</mentioned> signi<lb ed="#Q"/>ficat
humanitatem in adiacentia sive inhaerentia,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia ostendit eam inesse subiecto, sed hoc voca<lb ed="#Q"/>bulum
<mentioned>humanitas</mentioned><!--p--> significat humanitatem in
<lb ed="#Q"/>subsistentia<!--q-->. Quia vero Deus omni genere simpli<lb ed="#Q"/>citatis
simplex est, non ostenditur aliqua composi<lb ed="#Q"/>tio
simplicitatis circa eum<!--r-->: unde cum dico <mentioned>Deus
<lb ed="#Q"/>est bonus</mentioned>, non ostenditur bonitas inesse Deo quae
<lb ed="#Q"/>ipse non sit. Quod attendens <name ref="#Dionysius">Dionysius</name> dixit:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Affirmationes de Deo sunt incompactae</quote>, quia
<lb ed="#Q"/>nullam compositionem proprietatis ad subiectum
<lb ed="#Q"/>ostendunt; de negationibusvero dixit quod <quote>sunt
<lb ed="#Q"/>verae</quote>, quia quiddam veri innuunt, scilicet quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>ibi non est compositio proprietatis ad subiectum</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q3c2-d1e332">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad secundum iam patet responsio ex
<lb ed="#Q"/>dictis<!--s-->.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>