-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2.xml
202 lines (201 loc) · 12.3 KB
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 5, M. 2, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-04-23">April 23, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-04-23" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="562"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-Hd1e118">I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 1, Q. 5, M. 2, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-Hd1e121" type="question-title">DE NOMINIBUS RELATIVE GRAMMATICE DESIGNANTIBUS.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e124">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Consequenter quaeritur de iis nominibus <mentioned>talis,
<lb ed="#Q"/>qualis</mentioned>. Haec autem aliquando accipiuntur in
<lb ed="#Q"/>respectu creaturae ad Creatorem<!--h-->, aliquando in
<lb ed="#Q"/>respectu personae ad personam.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e135">
<lb ed="#Q"/>I. Quantum ad primum modum obicitur sic:
<lb ed="#Q"/>quaeritur<!--1--> <quote>utrum haec sit concedenda <mentioned>qualis
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Deus, talis est Petrus</mentioned></quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e144">
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Quod sic probatur: Et Deus est iustus et
<lb ed="#Q"/>Petrus est iustus<!--i-->; ergo Deus et Petrus sunt
<lb ed="#Q"/>iusti; ergo qualis est Deus, talis est Petrus; ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deus est aliqualis</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e156">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Solutio secundum <name>Praepositinum</name>: <quote>Haec<!--k-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>propositio est vera<!--l--> <mentioned>qualis est Deus, talis est
<lb ed="#Q"/>Petrus</mentioned>, quia aequipollet huic <mentioned>Petrus est similis
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deo</mentioned>, quia particeps est bonitatis eius et iusti<lb ed="#Q"/>tiae:
nisi enim<!--m--> esset particeps bonitatis eius,
<lb ed="#Q"/>Petrus non esset similis ei. — Instantia<!--n--> ul<lb ed="#Q"/>timi:
Petrus est similis Deo et Petrus est<!--o--> qua<lb ed="#Q"/>litate
affectus<!--p-->; ergo Deus qualitate est af<lb ed="#Q"/>fectus<!--q--></quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e178">
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-Qd1e181">Sed quaeritur quid significent<!--r--> <mentioned>talis et qua<lb ed="#Q"/>lis</mentioned>,
cum dicitur <mentioned>qualis est Deus, talis est Pe<lb ed="#Q"/>trus</mentioned>.
Videtur enim quod significent qualita<lb ed="#Q"/>tem
circa Petrum, et <mentioned>talis</mentioned> ibi<!--s--> refertur ad
<mentioned>qualis</mentioned>; ergo <mentioned>qualis</mentioned><!--t--> similiter qualitatem si<lb ed="#Q"/>gnificat</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e193">
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad hoc respondet <name>Praepositinus</name> di<lb ed="#Q"/>cens
<quote>quod <mentioned>qualis</mentioned> ibi divinam naturam signi<lb ed="#Q"/>ficat
et <mentioned>talis</mentioned>, sed dissimiliter. Nam <mentioned>qualis</mentioned> di<lb ed="#Q"/>vinam
naturam significat secundum<!--u--> quod ipsa
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Deus, <mentioned>talis</mentioned> eamdem significat secundum quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>Petrus particeps est eius</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e209">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sed dicendum aliter quod <mentioned>qualis'</mentioned><!--v--> signi<lb ed="#Q"/>ficat
divinam naturam ut qualitatem exemplarem,
<lb ed="#Q"/>videlicet iustitiam, sapientiam etc.; <mentioned>talis</mentioned> vero
<lb ed="#Q"/>significat formam exemplatam<!--x--> in Petro, quae
<lb ed="#Q"/>est qualitas, ut iustitia, sapientia creata. Quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo arguit quod <mentioned>qualis</mentioned> qualitatem significat,
<lb ed="#Q"/>non sequitur, sed per modum qualitatis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e227">
<lb ed="#Q"/>II. Quantum ad secundum modum obicitur<!--2-->:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Cum dicitur <mentioned>qualis est Pater, talis est Filius,
<lb ed="#Q"/>talis est<!--y--> Spiritus Sanctus</mentioned>, quaeritur utrum
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>talis et qualis</mentioned> significent ibi divinam na<lb ed="#Q"/>turam<!--z--></quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e236">
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Ad quod sic: 1. Demonstrato Filio, dico <mentioned>talis
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Pater</mentioned>; hoc nomen <mentioned>talis</mentioned> ibi demonstrat Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lium;
ergo significat Filium; ergo supponit pro
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filio; ergo propositio est falsa</quote>, quia tunc in<lb ed="#Q"/>tellectus
est: <mentioned>talis est Filius</mentioned>, demonstrato Filio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e250">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Dicunt quidam quod significatur effectus di<lb ed="#Q"/>vinorum
operum circa creaturas, id est qualis est
<lb ed="#Q"/>effectus Patris erga creaturas, talis est effectus
<pb ed="#Q" n="563"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filii. — Quod non videtur, quia in <title>Symbolo</title><!--1-->,
<lb ed="#Q"/>ubi dicitur: <quote>Qualis<!--a--> Pater</quote> etc., subiungitur:
<quote>Immensus Pater</quote> etc., in quibus exemplis non fit
<lb ed="#Q"/>sermo de effectu divinorum operum erga creaturas.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Item, si de effectu: ergo antequam creatura esset,
<lb ed="#Q"/>non erat verum de Patre et Filio quod modo dicitur
<mentioned>qualis Pater, talis Filius</mentioned> etc., quia nondum erat
<lb ed="#Q"/>aliquis effectus divinorum operum erga creaturas.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e276">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, cum dicitur <mentioned>Pater est iustus et Filius
<lb ed="#Q"/>est talis</mentioned>, idem significatur per hoc relativum <mentioned>ta<lb ed="#Q"/>lis</mentioned>
quod per hoc antecedens <mentioned>iustus</mentioned>; sed per
<lb ed="#Q"/>hoc nomen<!--b--> <mentioned>iustus</mentioned> significatur divina essentia;
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo per hoc nomen <mentioned>talis</mentioned>. — Item<!--2-->, hac locu<lb ed="#Q"/>tione
<mentioned>qualis est Pater</mentioned> fit interrogatio de essen<lb ed="#Q"/>tia;
sed tam hoc nomen <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> quam hoc nomen
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>bonus</mentioned> significat divinam essentiam; ergo sicut
<lb ed="#Q"/>ad praedictam interrogationem<!--c--> congrue respon<lb ed="#Q"/>detur:
<mentioned>Pater est bonus</mentioned>, ita <mentioned>Pater est Deus</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e298">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Item, Pater est Pater et Filius est talis; ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum <mentioned>talis</mentioned> non significat essentiam, sed perso<lb ed="#Q"/>nam,
Filius est Pater<!--d-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e307">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo<!--e-->: 1. Ad primum dicendum quod<!--3-->,
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>sicut in aliis facultatibus dicitur<!--f-->, <mentioned>nominales
<lb ed="#Q"/>demonstrationes aliud demonstrant et aliud ap<lb ed="#Q"/>pellant</mentioned>,
et ita<!--g--> hoc nomen <mentioned>talis</mentioned> demonstrat Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lium
et appellat Patrem, divinam tamen naturam
<lb ed="#Q"/>significat</quote>. Non est igitur verum quod supponat
<lb ed="#Q"/>pro Filio, sed pro Patre.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e323">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad secundum dicendum quod<!--4--> <quote>licet
<lb ed="#Q"/>vocabula essentialia divinam naturam significent,
<lb ed="#Q"/>tamen dissimiliter significant. Quaedam enim si<lb ed="#Q"/>gnificant<!--h-->
divinam naturam ad modum substan<lb ed="#Q"/>tiae,
ut omnia substantialia vocabula essentiam
<lb ed="#Q"/>significantia, ut <mentioned>Deus, bonitas</mentioned> et similia; et
<lb ed="#Q"/>illa omnia respondentur ad interrogationem factam
<lb ed="#Q"/>per <mentioned>quid est</mentioned>. Quaedam significant divinam na<lb ed="#Q"/>turam
ad modum qualitatis, ut adiectiva, quae in
<lb ed="#Q"/>aliis facultatibus qualitatem significant, ut <mentioned>bo<lb ed="#Q"/>nus,
iustus, sapiens</mentioned>; et illa respondentur ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>interrogationem factam per <mentioned>qualis</mentioned>. Quaedam<!--i-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>ad modum relationis, ut <mentioned>aequalis, similis, co<lb ed="#Q"/>aeternus</mentioned>
et illa respondentur ad interrogationem
<lb ed="#Q"/>factam per <mentioned>quomodo se habet</mentioned>, ut si dicatur
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>quomodo se habet<!--k--> Pater ad Filium?</mentioned> similis
<lb ed="#Q"/>est ei<!--l-->, aequalis est<!--m--> ei, et ita de reliquis per
<lb ed="#Q"/>ordinem praedicamentorum intelligatur</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t1q5m2c2-d1e362">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Ad tertium dicendum: cum dicitur <mentioned>Pater
<lb ed="#Q"/>est Pater</mentioned>, praedico non quid nec<!--n--> quale nec
<lb ed="#Q"/>quantum, sed quomodo se habens, id est ad ali<lb ed="#Q"/>quid,
et ideo cum additur <mentioned>talis</mentioned>, incongrua est
<lb ed="#Q"/>adiunctio, sed deberet<!--o--> addi <mentioned>quomodo se ha<lb ed="#Q"/>bens</mentioned>,
ut diceretur <mentioned>Pater est Pater et Filius est
<lb ed="#Q"/>quomodo se habens vel alio modo se habens</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>nec sequitur inconveniens, quia <mentioned>Pater et Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lius</mentioned>,
sicut<!--p--> dicit <name>Damascenus</name><!--5-->, dicunt exi<lb ed="#Q"/>stentiae
modum, non quid vel quale.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>