-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m2c4.xml
113 lines (112 loc) · 5.77 KB
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m2c4.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, M. 2, C. 4</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-04-26">April 26, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-04-08" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="602"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m2c4">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m2c4-Hd1e3741">I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, M. 2, C. 4</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m2c4-Hd1e3744" type="question-title">UTRUM ADAM IN STATU INNOCENTIAE DICERETUR FILIUS DEI.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m2c4-d1e3747">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Deinde quaeritur utrum Adam in statu inno<lb ed="#Q"/>centiae
diceretur filius Dei.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m2c4-d1e3754">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad quod sic: I <title>Sententiarum</title>, 26 dist.<!--6-->, dicitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod nos sumus prius nati quam filii. Secundum
<lb ed="#Q"/>hoc videtur quod Adam in primo statu<!--k--> non fuit
<lb ed="#Q"/>filius, nec angeli<!--l--> similiter, et quod postea non
<lb ed="#Q"/>potuerunt dici filii adoptivi, quoniam adoptio<!--m-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>est mutatio ab ira in amorem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m2c4-d1e3770">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo: Quod dicitur quod <mentioned>nascimur
<lb ed="#Q"/>prius quam simus filii</mentioned>, intelligendum est de statu
<lb ed="#Q"/>post lapsum. Unde Adam fuit simul plasmatus
<lb ed="#Q"/>et filius et postea mutari potuit in filium gra<lb ed="#Q"/>tiae;
unde <name ref="#Lombard">Magister</name> loquitur de filiis per
<lb ed="#Q"/>adoptionem. Et similiter fuit in Adam, quia prius
<lb ed="#Q"/>fuit quam filius per gratiam gratum facientem,
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>sed in hoc est dissimile<!--n--> quod nos sumus prius
<lb ed="#Q"/>filii irae, quod<!--o--> ipse non fuit. Notandum etiam<!--p-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod Adam etsi non tempore, tamen natura
<lb ed="#Q"/>prius fuit quam inerit filius Dei sive per gra<lb ed="#Q"/>tiam
innocentiae<!--q--> sive per gratiam gratum fa<lb ed="#Q"/>cientem,
sicut prius est considerare naturam,
<lb ed="#Q"/>postea eius innocentiam.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m2c4-d1e3806">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad aliud dicendum quod, cum adoptio sit
<lb ed="#Q"/>mutatio in gratiam, duplex dicitur adoptio, sicut
<lb ed="#Q"/>duplex mutatio. Mutatio enim quaedam est se<lb ed="#Q"/>cundum
contradictionem sive negationem, quae<lb ed="#Q"/>dam
secundum contrarietatem, sicut cum<!--r--> anima
<lb ed="#Q"/>mutatur ab ignorantia in scientiam: cum mutatur
<lb ed="#Q"/>ab ignorantia in scientiam<!--s--> secundum negatio<lb ed="#Q"/>nem,
tunc est mutatio secundum contradictionem;
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum vero ab ignorantia secundum dispositionem,
<pb ed="#Q" n="603"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>mutatio est secundum contrarietatem. Secundum
<lb ed="#Q"/>hoc adoptio potest esse mutatio in gratiam se<lb ed="#Q"/>cundum
negationem, cum scilicet de non-grato fit
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>gratus; vel potest esse mutatio de ingrato se<lb ed="#Q"/>cundum
dispositionem. Primo modo fuit adoptio
<lb ed="#Q"/>in Adam, secundo modo in nobis.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>