-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3.xml
246 lines (245 loc) · 15.1 KB
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, M. 5, C. 3</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-04-28">April 28, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-04-28" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="621"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-Hd1e3741">I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, M. 5, C. 3</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-Hd1e3744" type="question-title">UTRUM SPIRITUS SANCTUS DEBEAT DICI <mentioned>SPIRITUS NOSTER</mentioned>.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3747">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Consequenter quaeritur utrum debeat Spiritus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctus<!--b--> dici <mentioned>Spiritus noster</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3756">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad quod sic: a. <title>Luc.</title> 1, 17<!--1-->, <quote>de Ioanne dicitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod <quote>in spiritu Eliae</quote> veniret; ecce dictus est Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritus
Sanctus spiritus<!--c--> quem accepit Elias. Et
<lb ed="#Q"/>Moysi ait Dominus, <title>Num.</title> 11, 17 : <quote>Tollam de spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritu
tuo et dabo eis</quote>, id est dabo eis de Spiritu
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sancto, quem iam dedi tibi</quote>; ecce hic dictus est
<lb ed="#Q"/>spiritus Moysis. Patet ergo quoniam Spiritus Sanc<lb ed="#Q"/>tus
noster dicitur Spiritus.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3776">
<lb ed="#Q"/>b. Item, <ref>18 dist. I <title>Sententiarum</title></ref>:
<cit>
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-Qd1e3785" source="http://scta.info/resource/pll1d18c5-d1e3480">Cum Spiritus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctus in Scriptura dicatur Spiritus noster vel
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritus tuus vel illius, ut de Moyse et de<!--d--> Elia
<lb ed="#Q"/>dictum est, nusquam tamen in Scriptura occurrit
<lb ed="#Q"/>ita dici <mentioned>Spiritus Sanctus noster vel tuus vel
<lb ed="#Q"/>illius</mentioned>, quia Spiritus Sanctus eo dicitur quo Do<lb ed="#Q"/>num
et utrumque dicitur relative ad Patrem et
<lb ed="#Q"/>ad Filium</quote>
<bibl><ref target="http://scta.info/resource/pll1d18c5-d1e3480">Lombardus, Sent., I, d. 18, c. 5 [n. 2]</ref></bibl>
</cit>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3810">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: 1. Quaeritur quare Spiritus Sanctus
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicatur Spiritus noster et non similiter Filius
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicatur<!--e--> <mentioned>noster</mentioned>. Si dicatur hoc esse eo quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filius relative dicitur ad Patrem — sed similiter
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritus Sanctus relative dicitur ad Patrem et Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lium,
et ita uterque eadem ratione dicitur <mentioned>noster</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3826">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, si propter collationem donorum dicitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritus Sanctus <mentioned>noster</mentioned>, eadem ratione et Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lius
debet dici <mentioned>noster</mentioned>, quia similiter dantur
<lb ed="#Q"/>nobis bona in eius missione spirituali sicut in
<lb ed="#Q"/>missione spirituali Spiritus Sancti.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3839">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Praeterea, Filius dicitur <mentioned>noster redemptor</mentioned>;
<lb ed="#Q"/>quare similiter non dicitur <mentioned>noster Filius</mentioned>?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3846">
<lb ed="#Q"/>4. Item, Pater dicitur <mentioned>Pater noster</mentioned>, quare non
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filius? cum magis communicemus cum Filio quam
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum Patre, quia Filius est incarnatus, non Pater.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3855">
<lb ed="#Q"/>5. Item, si ratione effectus dicitur <mentioned>redemptor no<lb ed="#Q"/>ster</mentioned>,
quare non dicitur <mentioned>sapientia nostra</mentioned>? cum
<lb ed="#Q"/>connotatur effectus in creatura. Unde <title>I Cor.</title> 1, 30:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Factus est nobis sapientia</quote> etc.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3866">
<lb ed="#Q"/>6. Item, quare non dicitur <mentioned>Spiritus Sanctus
<lb ed="#Q"/>noster</mentioned>, sicut <mentioned>Spiritus noster</mentioned>?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3874">
<lb ed="#Q"/>7. Item, quare dicitur <mentioned>Deus noster</mentioned> et non
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>essentia nostra</mentioned>? cum hoc nomen <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> signi<lb ed="#Q"/>ficet
essentiam.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3887">
<lb ed="#Q"/>8. Praeterea, quaeritur utrum Spiritus Sanctus
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicatur haberi, cum habetur eius donum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3894">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo: Nullum nomen essentiale abstracte
<lb ed="#Q"/>significans divinam essentiam<!--f-->, vel nomen per<lb ed="#Q"/>sonale,
quod dicit tantum respectum personae ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>personam, recipit hoc nomen <mentioned>noster</mentioned> supra se.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Unde non potest dici <mentioned>sapientia vel deitas no<lb ed="#Q"/>stra</mentioned>,
sed <mentioned>Deus noster, refugium nostrum</mentioned><!--3-->. Si<lb ed="#Q"/>militer
et in personalibus; unde cum Filius dicat
<lb ed="#Q"/>solum respectum ad Patrem, non potest recipere
<lb ed="#Q"/>supra se hanc adiectionem<!--g--> <mentioned>noster</mentioned>. Sed nomina
<lb ed="#Q"/>quae significant divinam essentiam vel<!--h--> personalia,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quae dicunt respectum ad creaturas, possunt eam<!--i-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>recipere.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3923">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Ad primum ergo dicendum
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod non dicitur <mentioned>Spiritus Sanctus noster'</mentioned>, eo
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod Spiritus Sanctus rationem eius quod est
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>ab alio'</mentioned> habet; sed dicitur <mentioned>Spiritus noster</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>prout Spiritus dicitur<!--k--> a spiratione activa, vel
<lb ed="#Q"/>prout etiam dicitur a spiratione passiva in crea<lb ed="#Q"/>tura<!--l-->,
secundum quod dicitur<!--m--> <mentioned>tota Trinitas
<lb ed="#Q"/>spirat Spiritum Sanctum in nobis</mentioned> vel <mentioned>Spiritus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctus inspiratur nobis a tota Trinitate</mentioned>, qua<lb ed="#Q"/>rum
utraque est effectus totius Trinitatis. Et hoc
<lb ed="#Q"/>modo Spiritus sumitur essentialiter, licet per ap<lb ed="#Q"/>propriationem
supponat pro tertia persona. Igitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>propter hunc respectum ad creaturas dicitur <mentioned>Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritus
noster</mentioned>; non autem quia<!--n--> Spiritus Sanctus,
<lb ed="#Q"/>in quantum supponit tertiam personam in Trini<lb ed="#Q"/>tate
et rationem habet<!--o--> eius quod est <mentioned>a principio</mentioned>
<lb ed="#Q"/>per processionem a Patre et Filio, dicitur <mentioned>Spiritus
<lb ed="#Q"/>noster</mentioned>; unde, ut sic est, dicit habitudinem ad eum
<lb ed="#Q"/>a quo est, et non ad<!--p--> aliquid quod est ab ipso,
<lb ed="#Q"/>sicut et Filius; unde nec potest dici <mentioned>Spiritus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctus noster</mentioned> nec <mentioned>Filius noster</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e3969">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad aliud dicendum quod licet in missione
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filii detur nobis Filius, sicut Spiritus Sanctus,
<lb ed="#Q"/>non tamen dicitur Filius <mentioned>Filius<!--q--> noster</mentioned> sicut.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritus Sanctus <mentioned>Spiritus noster</mentioned>, quoniam Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lius
non dicit nomine suo respectum ad creaturas
<pb ed="#Q" n="622"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>sicut hoc nomen <mentioned>Spiritus</mentioned>. Unde Spiritus, prout
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur a processione aeterna quasi passive<!--a-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicta, non potest dici <mentioned>noster</mentioned>, quoniam sic habet
<lb ed="#Q"/>respectum ad Patrem et Filium solum a quibus
<lb ed="#Q"/>spiratur. — Si autem obiciatur ad hoc quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>in Spiritu Sancto remanet Spiritus, ergo cum Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritus<!--b-->
dicat respectum ad creaturas, et Spiritus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctus, quare Spiritus Sanctus dicetur <mentioned>noster</mentioned>
<lb ed="#Q"/>sicut et <mentioned>Spiritus</mentioned> - respondeo quod <mentioned>Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritus</mentioned>,
prout additur ei <mentioned>Sanctus</mentioned>, dicit quasi
<lb ed="#Q"/>passivo modo solummodo spirationem aeternam;
<lb ed="#Q"/>unde, in quantum sic est, refertur ad Patrem et
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filium a quibus procedit, et non ad creaturam.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e4015">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Ad tertium dicendum quod <mentioned>redemptor</mentioned> di<lb ed="#Q"/>cit
respectum ad creaturam, scilicet ad redemptum;
<lb ed="#Q"/>sed Filius solum<!--c--> ad Patrem refertur; ideo Filius
<lb ed="#Q"/>non dicitur <mentioned>noster</mentioned>, licet dicatur <mentioned>redemptor noster</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e4027">
<lb ed="#Q"/>4. Ad quartum dicendum quod <mentioned>Pater</mentioned> di<lb ed="#Q"/>citur
dupliciter. Dicitur enim principium per ge<lb ed="#Q"/>nerationem,
et sic est solum personale nec reci<lb ed="#Q"/>pit
supra se<!--d--> <mentioned>noster</mentioned>; dicitur etiam<!--e--> principium
<lb ed="#Q"/>per creationem, et sic essentiale<!--f--> et connotat ef<lb ed="#Q"/>fectum
in creatura; sed Filius dicitur tantum uno
<lb ed="#Q"/>modo, scilicet relative ad Patrem: unde non dicit
<lb ed="#Q"/>nomine suo respectum ad creaturam, ideo non po<lb ed="#Q"/>test
dici <mentioned>Filius noster</mentioned>, licet dicatur <mentioned>Pater noster</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e4049">
<pb ed="#Q" n="622"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/> 5. Ad illud quod quaeritur <mentioned>utrum possit dici
<lb ed="#Q"/>sapientia nostra, sicut redemptor noster</mentioned><!--g-->: dicen<lb ed="#Q"/>dum
quod non, quia sapientia dicit divinam es<lb ed="#Q"/>sentiam
ut formam, et ideo per modum abstracti,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et ideo non connotatur ut in respectu ad crea<lb ed="#Q"/>turam
nisi<!--h--> loquendo per causam, et sic posset
<lb ed="#Q"/>dici sapientia nostra, quia facit nos sapere,
<lb ed="#Q"/><title>I Cor.</title> 1, 30: <quote>Factus est nobis sapientia</quote> etc.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e4073">
<lb ed="#Q"/>7. Ad aliud dicendum quod Deus potest
<lb ed="#Q"/>dici<!--i--> <mentioned>noster</mentioned>, quia <mentioned>Deus</mentioned> est nomen operatio<lb ed="#Q"/>nis<!--1-->:
unde notatur effectus in creatura; essentia
<lb ed="#Q"/>vero non sic; ideo non potest dici <mentioned>essentia no<lb ed="#Q"/>stra</mentioned>.
Deus enim dicitur <mentioned><foreign xml:lang="gr">θεᾶσθαι</foreign></mentioned> quod est
<lb ed="#Q"/>considerare vel a <mentioned><foreign xml:lang="gr">θέειν</foreign></mentioned> quod est fovere<!--2-->; unde
<lb ed="#Q"/>ratione effectus connotati dicitur <mentioned>Deus noster</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>essentia vero nullum habet huiusmodi respectum:
<lb ed="#Q"/>unde nec dicitur <mentioned>nostra</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t2s1q2m5c3-d1e4095">
<lb ed="#Q"/>8. Ad ultimum dicendum quod est donum
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritus quod non est cum Spiritu Sancto, ut
<lb ed="#Q"/>timor servilis, et quod est cum Spiritu Sancto, ut
<lb ed="#Q"/>caritas; et sunt dona a Spiritu Sancto, quae
<lb ed="#Q"/>aliquando sunt cum Spiritu Sancto, aliquando non
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum Spiritu Sancto, ut fides et prophetia. Ra<lb ed="#Q"/>tione
ergo illorum donorum quae sunt a Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritu
Sancto et cum Spiritu Sancto, dicitur haberi
<lb ed="#Q"/>vel dari.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>