-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3.xml
154 lines (153 loc) · 8 KB
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 1, C. 3</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-05-10">May 10, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-05-10" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="684"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-Hd1e3741">I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 1, C. 3</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-Hd1e3744" type="question-title">UTRUM INNASCIBILITAS SIT PROPRIETAS PATRIS.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3747">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quaestio consequens est utrum innascibilitas
<lb ed="#Q"/>sit proprietas Patris<!--7-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3754">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Quod sic videtur: a. Quia sufficienter distin<lb ed="#Q"/>guit
personam Patris ab omni alia persona; ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>est proprietas.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3763">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: 1. Pater dicitur ingenitus eo quod non
<lb ed="#Q"/>est ens ab alio per generationem; sed hoc simi<lb ed="#Q"/>liter
convenit Spiritui Sancto; ergo non est pro<lb ed="#Q"/>prium
Patris, sed commune Patri et Spiritui
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sancto esse ingenitum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3777">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, videtur quod <mentioned>ingenitus</mentioned>, secundum
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod dicitur negative, convenit essentiae, quia
<lb ed="#Q"/>essentia non est ens ab alio; ergo non est pro<lb ed="#Q"/>pria
notio Patris.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3788">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Item, si innascibilitas distinguit Patrem, ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>quid erit<!--z--> alia proprietas distinguens?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3795">
<lb ed="#Q"/>4. Item, quae prius distinguit personam Patris,
<lb ed="#Q"/>innascibilitas aut paternitas?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3802">
<lb ed="#Q"/>5. Item, cum procedere non conveniat Patri
<lb ed="#Q"/>sicut nec nasci, quare assignatur proprietas Patri
<lb ed="#Q"/>per privationem nativitatis, scilicet innascibilitas,
<pb ed="#Q" n="685"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>et non similiter per privationem processionis, ut
<lb ed="#Q"/>improcessibilitas?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3820">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Respondeo: 1. <mentioned>Ingeniius</mentioned>, sicut et ignorantia,
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur dupliciter: negative et quasi contrarie.
<lb ed="#Q"/>Primo modo convenit Patri, secundo modo con<lb ed="#Q"/>venit
Spiritui Sancto; et ideo <mentioned>ingenitus</mentioned> non
<lb ed="#Q"/>potest esse communis notio utrique, cum dicatur
<lb ed="#Q"/>de eis multipliciter. Nec iterum <mentioned>ingenitus</mentioned>, prout
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur quasi<!--a--> contrarie, id est habens proprie<lb ed="#Q"/>tatem
distinctam et quasi contrariam generationi,
<lb ed="#Q"/>est alia notio a processione: Spiritus enim Sanc<lb ed="#Q"/>tus,
eo quod procedit ab alio per spirationem,
<lb ed="#Q"/>est ingenitus.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3846">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad aliud dicendum quod <mentioned>non ens ab alio</mentioned>
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur dupliciter: aut quia nullo modo est ens
<lb ed="#Q"/>ab alio nec in se nec in alio aut non ens ab
<lb ed="#Q"/>alio in se, tamen est ens<!--b--> ab alio in alio. Primo
<lb ed="#Q"/>modo non convenit essentiae et est Patris pro<lb ed="#Q"/>prietas;
secundo modo convenit essentiae cum
<lb ed="#Q"/>determinatione, et sic non est proprietas Patris,
<lb ed="#Q"/>ut<!--c--> sit sensus: essentia est in Filio a Patre.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3867">
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Ad aliud dicendum quod innascibilitas non
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicit habitudinem ad alias personas, cum sit ha<lb ed="#Q"/>bitudo
Patris ad Filium una et ad Spiritum
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctum alia: quare necessariae fuerunt<!--d--> duae
<lb ed="#Q"/>notiones quae dicerent has habitudines.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3883">
<lb ed="#Q"/>4. Ad aliud dicendum quod <mentioned>prius</mentioned> dicitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>dupliciter: ante quod nihil vel quod proximius;
per prius ergo distinguit innascibilitas, quia nihil
<lb ed="#Q"/>ante, sed paternitas immediatius et proximius.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e3892">
<lb ed="#Q"/>5. Ad aliud dicendum, sicut dictum est prius
<lb ed="#Q"/>de spiratione<!--1-->. Vel dicendum quod innascibilitas,
<lb ed="#Q"/>secundum rationem intelligentiae dicit non ens
<lb ed="#Q"/>ab alio per generationem; potest ergo fieri ne<lb ed="#Q"/>gatio
simpliciter<!--e--> ut negetur esse ab alio, et sic
<lb ed="#Q"/>includit in se ingenerationem et improcessionem,
<lb ed="#Q"/>et sic est proprietas Patris. Vel potest fieri ab<lb ed="#Q"/>negatio
huius totius <mentioned>esse ab alio pergeneratio<lb ed="#Q"/>nem</mentioned>,
et sic non est proprietas Patris: sic enim
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>non-processibilitas</mentioned> esset Patris<!--f--> proprietas. Sed
<lb ed="#Q"/>ad illud solutum est plenius in Quaestione De
<lb ed="#Q"/>numero notionum<!--2-->.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>