-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1.xml
269 lines (268 loc) · 16 KB
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 1</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-05-10">May 10, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-05-10" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="705"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-Hd1e3741">I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 1</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-Hd1e3744" type="question-title">UTRUM MISSIO ACTIVE DICTA CONVENIAT TRINITATI RESPECTU FILII VEL SPIRITUS SANCTI<!--1-->.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3747">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Circa primum sic obicitur: 1. <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>in libro <title>Contra perfidiam Arianorum</title><!--2-->: <quote>Nec
<lb ed="#Q"/>Pater sine Filio nec Filius sine Patre misit Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritum
Sanctum, sed eum pariter ambo miserunt,
<lb ed="#Q"/>inseparabilia quippe sunt opera Trinitatis</quote>. Haec
<lb ed="#Q"/>autem ratio nulla esset nisi mittere Spiritum
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctum<!--d--> esset actus totius Trinitatis; ergo mis<lb ed="#Q"/>sio
active dicta convenit toti Trinitati.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3772">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, sicut dictum est<!--3-->, missio transfertur ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>divinas personas, non quia aliqua illarum sit ubi
<lb ed="#Q"/>prius non erat, sed quia per illas aliquid efficitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod prius non fiebat; missio ergo convenit per<lb ed="#Q"/>sonis
ratione alicuius effectus procedentis ab ipsis,
<lb ed="#Q"/>sicut et processio temporalis; sed ille effectus
<lb ed="#Q"/>communis est toti Trinitati et ille effectus est a
<lb ed="#Q"/>tota Trinitate; ergo et missio est a tota Trinitate.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3792">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Item, Spiritus sanctus mittitur a Patre et Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lio,
hoc certum est; item, mittitur<!--e--> a se ipso, sicut
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur in<!--f--> 15 dist. I libri<!--g--> <title>Sententiarum</title><!--4-->; ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritus Sanctus<!--h--> mittitur a tota Trinitate, ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>tota Trinitas mittit Spiritum Sanctum; ergo missio
<lb ed="#Q"/>active dicta convenit toti Trinitati.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3809">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: a. <name>Beda</name>, in <title>Homilia Dominicae I post
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ascensionem</title><!--5-->: <quote>Missio Spiritus Sancti<!--i--> est eius
<lb ed="#Q"/>processio</quote>; sed Spiritus Sanctus non procedit a
<lb ed="#Q"/>tota Trinitate; ergo non mittitur a tota Trinitate;
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo haec est falsa <mentioned>tota Trinitas mittit Spiritum
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctum</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3825">
<lb ed="#Q"/>b. Item, Pater est persona quae a nulla, sed a
<lb ed="#Q"/>qua alia, Filius persona quae<!--k--> ab alia, a qua
<lb ed="#Q"/>alia<!--l-->, Spiritus Sanctus<!--m--> persona quae ab alia,
<lb ed="#Q"/>a qua nulla persona; sed Pater dicitur mittere,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia ab ipso<!--n--> est alia persona, mitti vero non
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicitur, quia non est ab aliqua<!--o--> persona, sicut
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicit <name>Augustinus</name><!--6-->; Filius vero dicitur mitti et
<lb ed="#Q"/>mittere, quia est ab alio, a quo alius; ergo Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritus
Sanctus dicetur missus, quia ab alio, sed
<lb ed="#Q"/>non mittens, quia nullus ab ipso; ergo mittere
<lb ed="#Q"/>non convenit toti Trinitati sicut nec mitti.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3851">
<lb ed="#Q"/>c. Item, si tota Trinitas ratione effectus connotati
<lb ed="#Q"/>mitteret Spiritum Sanctum<!--p-->, cum similiter con<lb ed="#Q"/>notetur
effectus in missione Filii, tota Trinitas
<lb ed="#Q"/>mitteret Filium, et ita Spiritus Sanctus mitteret
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filium<!--q-->: quod non invenitur nisi<!--r--> de Filio se<lb ed="#Q"/>cundum
humanam naturam.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3867">
<lb ed="#Q"/>d. Item, mittere Filium est aliquid operari per
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filium in creatura rationali; sed operari per Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lium
non convenit toti Trinitati<!--7-->; ergo nec mittere
<pb ed="#Q" n="706"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filium convenit toti Trinitati; ergo similiter nec
<lb ed="#Q"/>mittere Spiritum Sanctum; ergo missio active
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicta non convenit Trinitati.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3887">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Solutio]: Ad hoc dicendum quod super hoc
<lb ed="#Q"/>sunt opiniones. Nam sunt quidam qui conce<lb ed="#Q"/>dunt
quod missio sive<!--a--> Filii sive Spiritus Sancti
<lb ed="#Q"/>active dicta convenit toti Trinitati; unde sicut
<lb ed="#Q"/>concedunt quod tota Trinitas dat Filium et etiam
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritum Sanctum, ita concedunt quod tota Tri<lb ed="#Q"/>nitas
mittit Spiritum Sanctum et similiter Filium.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3905">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Alii autem negant utramque. Alii autem<!--b--> con<lb ed="#Q"/>cedunt
istam <mentioned>tota Trinitas dat Filium vel<!--c--> Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritum
Sanctum</mentioned>, sed negant istam <mentioned>tota Trinitas
<lb ed="#Q"/>mittit Filium vel<!--d--> Spiritum Sanctum</mentioned>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3919">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Notandum<!--e--> igitur quod missio active dicta
<lb ed="#Q"/>potest dupliciter determinari. Nam uno modo
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicit divinam essentiam et consignificat distinctio<lb ed="#Q"/>nem
sive notionem, et sic dicitur missio manife<lb ed="#Q"/>statio
productionis alicuius personae per aliquem
<lb ed="#Q"/>effectum in creatura<!--1-->; et quia per<!--f--> nomen <mentioned>mis<lb ed="#Q"/>sionis</mentioned>
significatur divina essentia principaliter
<lb ed="#Q"/>et in rectitudine, a qua est effectus, notio vero
<lb ed="#Q"/>secundario et in obliquitate, quia manifestatur in
<lb ed="#Q"/>illo effectu: ideo concedunt quod missio active
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicta convenit toti Trinitati; unde sicut conce<lb ed="#Q"/>dunt
istam <mentioned>tota Trinitas manifestat processio<lb ed="#Q"/>nem
Filii et Spiritus Sancti</mentioned>, ita concedunt
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod tota Trinitas mittit Filium et Spiritum Sanc<lb ed="#Q"/>tum
et concedunt rationes primas quae sunt pro
<lb ed="#Q"/>parte ista.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3961">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta]: a. Ad primo autem obiectum
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicunt<!--g--> quod, cum dicit <name>Beda</name><!--h-->: <quote>Spiritus Sancti
<lb ed="#Q"/>missio est eius processio</quote>, loquitur de proces<lb ed="#Q"/>sione
temporali<!--i--> qua dicitur Spiritus Sanctus
<lb ed="#Q"/>procedere ratione effectus, in quo datur vel ma<lb ed="#Q"/>nifestatur
dari Spiritum Sanctum. Unde Spiritus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctus non dicitur procedere nisi ratione effectus
<lb ed="#Q"/>procedentis ab ipsa Trinitate, cum quo effectu
<lb ed="#Q"/>simul datur Spiritus Sanctus: et secundum hanc
<lb ed="#Q"/>improprietatem concedit <name ref="#Lombard">Magister</name>, in I <title>Senten<lb ed="#Q"/>tiarum</title>,
15 dist., quod Spiritus Sanctus<!--k--> pro<lb ed="#Q"/>cedit
a se et mittitur a se; secundum hoc etiam
<lb ed="#Q"/>conceditur quod Spiritus Sanctus incipit esse in
<lb ed="#Q"/>rationali creatura quando datur ei<!--l--> gratia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e3995">
<lb ed="#Q"/>b. Ad aliud quod obicitur quod <mentioned>Pater, qui a
<lb ed="#Q"/>nullo est, non dicitur missus, ergo Spiritus Sanctus
<lb ed="#Q"/>a quo nullus, non dicitur mittens</mentioned>: dicunt quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>non est simile, quia in iis verbis <mentioned>mittere</mentioned> et
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>mitti</mentioned> consignificatur<!--m--> habitudo principii ad illud
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod est de principio; esse autem<!--n--> ab aliquo sive
<lb ed="#Q"/>a principio negatur sive removetur universaliter
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>a Patre, ita quod nullo modo potest dici esse de<!--o-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>principio; esse autem principium non removetur
<lb ed="#Q"/>universaliter a Spiritu Sancto, sed Spiritus Sanc<lb ed="#Q"/>tus
dicitur esse principium creaturae sive effectus<!--p-->
<lb ed="#Q"/>qui fit in creatura. Et ideo sicut<!--q--> conceditur quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritus Sanctus facit se esse in creatura per gra<lb ed="#Q"/>tiam
et Trinitas facit Spiritum Sanctum per gratiam
<lb ed="#Q"/>esse in creatura rationali, ita potest concedi quod
tota Trinitas mittit Spiritum Sanctum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e4030">
<lb ed="#Q"/>c. Ad aliud autem satis patet<!--r--> solutio. Nam
<lb ed="#Q"/>secundum istam rationem missionis, quae dicta
<lb ed="#Q"/>est<!--2-->, sicut conceditur quod tota Trinitas mittit Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lium,
ita etiam conceditur quod Spiritus Sanctus
<lb ed="#Q"/>mittit Filium, quia facit ipsum cognosci quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>procedit aeternaliter a Patre per effectum proce<lb ed="#Q"/>dentem
ab ipso temporaliter.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e4048">
<lb ed="#Q"/>d. Ad aliud autem<!--s--> solvunt per interemptio<lb ed="#Q"/>nem.
Non enim idem est operari per Filium et mit<lb ed="#Q"/>tere
Filium, sed potius manifestare illam<!--t--> opera<lb ed="#Q"/>tionem
esse per Filium. Unde concedunt istam
<lb ed="#Q"/><mentioned>Spiritus Sanctus mittit Filium</mentioned> vel <mentioned>Trinitas mit<lb ed="#Q"/>tit
Filium</mentioned>, non quia Trinitas vel Spiritus Sanc<lb ed="#Q"/>tus
operetur per Filium, sed quia Trinitas vel
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritus Sanctus<!--u--> per aliquem effectum, appro<lb ed="#Q"/>priatum
Filio, manifestat Patrem operari per Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lium:
et hoc bene convenit toti Trinitati.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e4070">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Alio autem<!--v--> modo potest determinari missio,
<lb ed="#Q"/>scilicet ut primo et principaliter significet notio<lb ed="#Q"/>tionem,
secundario vero actionem sive manife<lb ed="#Q"/>stationem,
qua illa notio manifestatur per ali<lb ed="#Q"/>quem
effectum. Unde hoc modo dicitur missio
<lb ed="#Q"/>active dicta productio alicuius personae manife<lb ed="#Q"/>stata
per aliquem effectum in creatura. Unde duo
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicuntur nomine missionis, scilicet notio principa<lb ed="#Q"/>liter
ibi significata et manifestatio illius notionis
<lb ed="#Q"/>per effectum ibi consignificata<!--x-->. Quia igitur illud
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod principaliter significatur nomine missionis
<lb ed="#Q"/>non convenit toti Trinitati, non concedunt quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>missio active dicta conveniat toti Trinitati; ideo
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicunt quod haec est falsa proprie loquendo <mentioned>tota
<lb ed="#Q"/>Trinitas mittit Filium vel Spiritum Sanctum</mentioned>, licet
<lb ed="#Q"/>actio ibi secundario significata, a qua est effectus
<lb ed="#Q"/>in creatura, conveniat toti Trinitati.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e4110">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta-]. 1. Ad hoc ergo quod<!--y--> primo
<lb ed="#Q"/>obicitur per auctoritatem <name>Augustini</name>: dicendum
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod, sicut dictum est<!--3-->, in missione active dicta
<lb ed="#Q"/>manifestatio illius productionis, et praeter hoc
<lb ed="#Q"/>etiam effectus per quem manifestatur. Non vult
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo dicere <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name> quod missio sit opus
<lb ed="#Q"/>totius<!--2--> Trinitatis nisi accipiatur improprie, sed
<pb ed="#Q" n="707"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>[quod] illud<!--a--> quod est ibi per modum operationis,
<lb ed="#Q"/>scilicet manifestatio productionis, sit opus Trini<lb ed="#Q"/>tatis
et hoc innuit, cum dicit: <quote>indivisa sunt
<lb ed="#Q"/>opera Trinitatis</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e4144">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad aliud dicendum quod<!--c-->, licet missio
<lb ed="#Q"/>transferatur ad divina ratione praedicta, quia di<lb ed="#Q"/>citur
efficere in creatura quod prius non faciebat,
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>non<!--d--> illud primo et principaliter significatur in
<lb ed="#Q"/>nomine missionis, sed potius respectus personae
<lb ed="#Q"/>mittentis ad illam quae mittitur, qui non est com<lb ed="#Q"/>munis
toti Trinitati, et ideo nec missio commu<lb ed="#Q"/>nis
est.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c1-d1e4166">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Ad tertium vero responsio postea habe<lb ed="#Q"/>bitur,
scilicet in sequenti Problemate<!--1-->.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>