-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3.xml
211 lines (210 loc) · 12.4 KB
/
ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 3</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<date when="2017-05-10">May 10, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a
<ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Q" n="quaracchi1924">Quaracchi 1924</witness>
<witness xml:id="V" n="vatlat701">Vat lat 701</witness>
<witness xml:id="B" n="borghlat359">Borgh. lat 359</witness>
<witness xml:id="U" n="urblat123">Urb lat 123</witness>
<witness xml:id="Pa" n="bnf15331">BnF 15331</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-05-10" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Q" n="709"/><cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-Hd1e3741">I, P. 2, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 3</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-Hd1e3744" type="question-title">UTRUM MISSIO ACTIVE DICTA CONVENIAT SPIRITUI SANCTO RESPECTU CHRISTI.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e3747">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Consequenter quaeritur utrum missio active dicta
<lb ed="#Q"/>conveniat Spiritui Sancto respectu Christi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e3754">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Ad quod sic<!--4-->: a. <title>Isai.</title> 48, 16: <quote>Et nunc misit me
<lb ed="#Q"/>Dominus et Spiritus eius</quote>; loquitur in persona
<lb ed="#Q"/>Christi; ergo Christus missus est a Spiritu Sancto;
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo mittere convenit Spiritui Sancto respectu
<lb ed="#Q"/>Christi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e3767">
<lb ed="#Q"/>b. Item, <name>Ambrosius</name>, in libro <title>De Spiritu
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sancto</title><!--5-->: <quote>Quis est qui dicit: <quote>Misit<!--t--> me Domi<lb ed="#Q"/>nus
et Spiritus eius</quote>? nisi qui venit a Patre ut
<lb ed="#Q"/>salvos faceret peccatores, id est Christus<!--v--></quote>. Ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>et Pater eum misit et Spiritus Sanctus<!--x-->. Item,
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>idem, in eodem<!--6-->: <quote>Datus est a Patre, ut Isaias
<lb ed="#Q"/>dicit 9, 6 quia <quote>puer natus est nobis et Filius
<lb ed="#Q"/>datus est nobis</quote>, datus est, audeo dicere, et a
<lb ed="#Q"/>Spiritu, quia a Spiritu missus est</quote>. Ergo etc.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e3792">
<lb ed="#Q"/>c. Item, <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, in II <title>De Trinitate</title><!--7-->, lo<lb ed="#Q"/>quens
de Filio: <quote>Mitti a Patre sine<!--y--> Spiritu
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sancto non potuit, quia Pater intelligitur eum
<lb ed="#Q"/>misisse, cum fecit eum ex femina; quod utique
<lb ed="#Q"/>non fecit sine Spiritu Sancto</quote>. Ergo mittere con<lb ed="#Q"/>venit
Patri et Spiritui Sancto respectu Christi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e3811">
<lb ed="#Q"/>Contra: 1. <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, II <title>De Trinitate</title><!--2-->:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Exire a Patre et venire in mundum hoc est
<lb ed="#Q"/>mitti</quote>. Ergo mittere Filium in mundum sive in
<pb ed="#Q" n="710"/>
<cb ed="#Q" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/>carnem convenit solum illi personae a qua exit
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filius; sed Filius non est a Spiritu Sancto: ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>missio Filii in mundum<!--a--> sive in carnem non est
<lb ed="#Q"/>a Spiritu Sancto.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e3834">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Item, <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name><!--a-->, IV <title>De Trinitate</title><!--l-->: <quote>Sicut
<lb ed="#Q"/>natum esse est Filio a Patre esse, ita<!--c--> mitti es
<lb ed="#Q"/>cognosci quod ab illo sit</quote>; sed Filius non potest
<lb ed="#Q"/>cognosci esse a Spiritu Sancto, cum non sit ab
<lb ed="#Q"/>illo; ergo non potest mitti a Spiritu Sancto; ergo
<lb ed="#Q"/>missio active dicta non convenit Spiritui. Sancto
<lb ed="#Q"/>respectu Christi. — Si dicatur quod convenit
<lb ed="#Q"/>ei ratione humanae naturae - contra: quidquid
<lb ed="#Q"/>convenit Christo homini, convenit personae Filii
<lb ed="#Q"/>Dei; ergo si mitti a Spiritu Sancto convenit
<lb ed="#Q"/>Christo homini, ergo<!--d--> convenit personae Filii
<lb ed="#Q"/>Dei<!--e-->; ergo persona Filii Dei mittitur a Spiritu
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sancto; ergo est a Spiritu Sancto: quod non
<lb ed="#Q"/>conceditur, immo potius<!--f--> Spiritum Sanctum esse
<lb ed="#Q"/>a Christo.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e3870">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Item, cum dicitur Filius mitti in carnem, aut
<lb ed="#Q"/>intelligitur de Filio Dei secundum humanam na<lb ed="#Q"/>turam
aut secundum divinam. Non videtur quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>secundum humanam naturam, quia aliud est Fi<lb ed="#Q"/>lium
mitti in carnem, aliud Christum existentem
<lb ed="#Q"/>in carne mitti: in carnem enim mitti non con<lb ed="#Q"/>venit
nisi existenti praeter carnem; ergo non
<lb ed="#Q"/>convenit Filio nisi secundum divinam naturam;
<lb ed="#Q"/>sed secundum divinam naturam non mittitur
<lb ed="#Q"/>Christus a Spiritu Sancto; ergo missio Christi in
<lb ed="#Q"/>carnem non est a Spiritu Sancto; sed non con<lb ed="#Q"/>venit
ei nisi missio vel in carnem vel in mentem;
<lb ed="#Q"/>ergo missio active dicta non convenit Spiritui
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sancto respectu Christi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e3903">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Solutio]: Ad hoc dicunt quidam<!--2--> quod tri<lb ed="#Q"/>plex
est missio Christi, scilicet in mentem, in
<lb ed="#Q"/>carnem et ad praedicandum. Et dicunt quod Spi<lb ed="#Q"/>ritus
Sanctus non mittit Christum<!--g--> duabus mis<lb ed="#Q"/>sionibus
primis, sed tertia, quae est ad praedi<lb ed="#Q"/>candum.
Et sic intelligitur auctoritas <title>Isai.</title> 48, 16<!--3-->:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Et nunc misit me Dominus et Spiritus eius</quote>, et
<lb ed="#Q"/>auctoritas <name>Ambrosii</name> similiter. Unde <name>Ambro<lb ed="#Q"/>sius</name>
ad hoc confirmandum adducit illam aucto<lb ed="#Q"/>ritatem
<title>Isai.</title> 61, 1: <quote>Spiritus Domini super me: evan<lb ed="#Q"/>gelizare
pauperibus misit me</quote>. Sed licet sic possit
<lb ed="#Q"/>responderi ad auctoritatem <name>Ambrosii</name>, non ta<lb ed="#Q"/>men
adhuc respondetur ad auctoritatem <name>Augu<lb ed="#Q"/>stini</name>,
quae intelligitur de missione Filii in car<lb ed="#Q"/>nem,
sicut patet per auctoritates quas adducit
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Q"/><name>Augustinus</name><!--4-->: <quote>Misit Deus Filium suum in ter<lb ed="#Q"/>ris</quote>
etc. Ideo<!--h--> alii dicunt quod haec est du<lb ed="#Q"/>plex
<mentioned>Spiritus Sanctus misit Filium in carnem</mentioned>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia hoc verbum <mentioned>misit</mentioned> potest construi cum hoc
<lb ed="#Q"/>quod dico <mentioned>Spiritus Sanctus</mentioned> ratione compara<lb ed="#Q"/>tionis
ad terminum ad quem, et sic est vera,
<lb ed="#Q"/>quia incarnatio Filii facta est a Spiritu Sancto
<lb ed="#Q"/>sicut et a tota Trinitate. Vel potest construi hoc
<lb ed="#Q"/>verbum <mentioned>misit</mentioned> cum hoc quod dico <mentioned>Spiritus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctus</mentioned> ratione comparationis ad personam quae
<lb ed="#Q"/>mittitur, et sic est falsa, quia Spiritus Sanctus
<lb ed="#Q"/>non habet auctoritatem respectu Filii. Utroque
<lb ed="#Q"/>autem modo dicitur missio Filii in carnem re<lb ed="#Q"/>spectu
Patris. Unde cum<!--i--> dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>:
<lb ed="#Q"/><quote>Mitti est exire a Patre et venire in mundum</quote>,
<lb ed="#Q"/>loquitur de missione Filii secundum quod convenit
<lb ed="#Q"/>Patri; unde mitti a Patre in mundum convenit
<lb ed="#Q"/>Filio, quia est a Patre et quia adventus eius in
<lb ed="#Q"/>mundum est a Patre sive incarnatio eius; mitti
<lb ed="#Q"/>vero a Spiritu Sancto convenit ei non quia per<lb ed="#Q"/>sona
eius sit a Spiritu Sancto, sed quia venire
<lb ed="#Q"/>ipsum in mundum sive in carnem<!--k--> est a Spiritu
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sancto.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e3993">
<lb ed="#Q"/>[Ad obiecta.]: 1. Et per hoc patet solutio ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>primo obiectum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e4001">
<lb ed="#Q"/>2. Ad aliud dicendum quod <mentioned>Filium cognosci
<lb ed="#Q"/>esse a Patre</mentioned> est Filium mitti, quia illa cognitio
<lb ed="#Q"/>est et Spiritu Sancto, ideo missio Filii est aliquo
<lb ed="#Q"/>modo a Spiritu Sancto. Sed hoc non est verum
<lb ed="#Q"/>de quocumque effectu in quo cognoscitur pro<lb ed="#Q"/>cessio
Filii, sed de tali effectu qui aliquo modo
<lb ed="#Q"/>praedicatur de persona Filii Dei, ut est incar<lb ed="#Q"/>natio;
unde non<!--l--> oportet quod si Spiritus Sanc<lb ed="#Q"/>tus
mittit Filium in carnem, quod per illum ef<lb ed="#Q"/>fectum
debeat cognosci Filius esse a Spiritu
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sancto, sed esse ab aliquo.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l1p2i2t3s2q2t2c3-d1e4027">
<lb ed="#Q"/>3. Ad aliud patet solutio ex praedictis. Nam
<lb ed="#Q"/>cum quaeris si Spiritus Sanctus misit Filium in
<lb ed="#Q"/>carnem aut secundum divinam naturam aut se<lb ed="#Q"/>cundum
humanam, tu quaeris secundum quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>illa constructio est ratione comparationis ad per<lb ed="#Q"/>sonam
quae mittitur: et secundum hoc illa<!--m--> lo<lb ed="#Q"/>cutio
est falsa; illa autem missio, qua Spiritus
<lb ed="#Q"/>Sanctus dicitur mittere Filium in carnem, nihil
<lb ed="#Q"/>aliud est quam manifestatio Filii per incarnatio<lb ed="#Q"/>nem,
quae manifestatio naturaliter sequitur<!--n--> ad
<lb ed="#Q"/>carnis assumptionem, et ideo non oportet quod
<lb ed="#Q"/>conveniat personae existenti praeter carnem.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>