-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1.xml
145 lines (145 loc) · 7.95 KB
/
ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 1, Q. 1, C. 1</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 1, Q. 1, C. 1</title>
<date when="2017-06-27">June 27, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qb" n="quaracchi1928">Quaracchi 1928</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-06-27" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Qb" n="158"/>
<cb ed="#Qb" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-Hd1e107">Ia-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 1, Q. 1, C. 1</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-Hd1e110" type="question-title">UTRUM IN ANGELIS POTENTIA SIT EADEM CUM ESSENTIA<!--1--></head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Quod autem potentia sit eadem cum essentia,
<lb ed="#Qb"/>videtur 1. ex comparatione ad animam ratio<lb ed="#Qb"/>nalem.
Dicit enim <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, in libro <title>De
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Trinitate</title><!--2-->, quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-Qd1e127">memoria, intelligentia et volun<lb ed="#Qb"/>tas
sunt una mens, una vita, una<!--b--> essentia</quote>; sed
<lb ed="#Qb"/>nonnisi essentia animae rationalis; ergo potentia
<lb ed="#Qb"/>in anima rationali est eadem cum essentia; sed
<lb ed="#Qb"/>maior simplicitas est in angelo, sicut dicit <name>Isi<lb ed="#Qb"/>dorus</name><!--3-->;
ergo in angelo<!--c--> erit potentia, ad minus
<lb ed="#Qb"/>aliqua, eadem cum essentia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e143">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>2. Item, in libro <title>De anima et spiritu</title><!--4-->, dicitur quod
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-Qd1e147">Deus est omnia<!--d--> sua, anima vero est quaedam
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sua </quote>, ut potentiae. Ergo multo fortius est in angelo.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e153">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>3. Item, angelus est substantia simplex, sicut
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dicit <name>Dionysius</name><!--5-->; sede in simplici substantia
<lb ed="#Qb"/>idem est potentia et essentia; ergo in angelo etc.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e163">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Contra: a. Summae simplicitatis est quod po<lb ed="#Qb"/>tentia
sit eadem cum essentia; sed angelus non
<lb ed="#Qb"/>est summe simplex; ergo non omnino idem est
<lb ed="#Qb"/>in angelo<!--f--> potentia et essentia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e174">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>b. Praeterea, si idem esset omnino, non oporteret
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ponere potentiam mediam in angelis inter essentiam
<lb ed="#Qb"/>et operationem; sed dicit <name>Dionysius</name><!--6--> quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-Qd1e182">su<lb ed="#Qb"/>percaelestia
dividuntur in tria, scilicet essentiam,
<lb ed="#Qb"/>virtutem et operationem</quote>; virtutem autem vocat
<lb ed="#Qb"/>potentiam; ergo potentia non est idem cum essentia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e192">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>c. Praeterea, potentia multiplex est in suo actu,
<lb ed="#Qb"/>essentia vero non est nisi unica in suo actu<!--g-->;
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ergo potentia non est idem secundum substan<lb ed="#Qb"/>tiam
cum essentia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e203">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod dicendum quod potentia<!--h-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>non est eadem penitus quod essentia. Dici tamen
<lb ed="#Qb"/>potest idem, sicut in anima rationali, quia se
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ipsa omnino potest.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e214">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Ad obiecta.]: 1. Ad primo obiectum dicendum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quod, cum dicitur quod<!--i--> <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-Qd1e220">memoria, intelligentia et
<lb ed="#Qb"/>voluntas sunt una essentia</quote>, non est aliud dictu<!--k-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>nisi quod una essentia animae est quae potest me<lb ed="#Qb"/>minisse,
intelligere et velle, non quod sit eadem
<lb ed="#Qb"/>essentia in genere potentiae: tunc enim essent una
<pb ed="#Qb" n="159"/>
<cb ed="#Qb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>potentia. Similiter potest intelligi de essentia, ra<lb ed="#Qb"/>tione
eius quod subest, non autem quod potentia
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dicatur essentia Vel substantia<!--a-->, sicut est in Deo.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e243">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>2. Ad aliud dicendum<!--b--> quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-Qd1e247">anima est
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quaedam sua</quote>, ut fiat distinctio inter potentias
<lb ed="#Qb"/>substantiales sive vires ex una parte et acci<lb ed="#Qb"/>dentia
ex alia, quantum ad hoc quod potentiae
<lb ed="#Qb"/>et vires substantialiter adhaerent et unum sunt<!--c-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>cum anima quantum ad substantiam, non dico
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quantum ad essentiam: potentiis enim substan<lb ed="#Qb"/>tialibus
subsistit anima; accidentia vero, ut
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>prudentia, fortitudo et huiusmodi, non adhaerent
<lb ed="#Qb"/>substantialiter, quia haec accidentaliter adsunt.
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Unde potentiae et vires substantiales dicuntur<!--d-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>idem quod anima ratione indivisionis et adhae<lb ed="#Qb"/>rentiae
substantialis, accidentia vero non, quia
<lb ed="#Qb"/>substantialiter non adhaerent.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s1q1c1-d1e282">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>3. Ad tertium dicendum<!--e--> quod, licet sim<lb ed="#Qb"/>plicitas
sit in angelo, non est tamen omnimoda
<lb ed="#Qb"/>simplicitas, et ideo non est idem<!--f--> potentia quod
<lb ed="#Qb"/>essentia omnino, quia nihil est sua potentia pe<lb ed="#Qb"/>nitus
praeterquam Deus.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>