-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3.xml
148 lines (148 loc) · 7.87 KB
/
ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 1, C. 3</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 1, C. 3</title>
<date when="2017-06-27">June 27, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qb" n="quaracchi1928">Quaracchi 1928</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-06-27" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Qb" n=""/>
<cb ed="#Qb" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-Hd1e107">Ia-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 1, C. 3</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-Hd1e110" type="question-title">UTRUM INTELLECTUS ANGELI SIT AGENS TANTUM AUT POSSIBILIS.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Deinde quaeritur de differentia intellectus pos<lb ed="#Qb"/>sibilis
et- agentis, utrum sit in angelis sicut
<lb ed="#Qb"/>est<!--e--> in hominibus<!--1-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e122">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Quod videtur: 1. Quia<!--f--> angelus habet poten<lb ed="#Qb"/>tiam
recipiendi cognoscibilia; sed potentia re<lb ed="#Qb"/>ceptiva
cognoscibilium dicitur intellectus possi<lb ed="#Qb"/>bilis<!--2-->;
ergo habet intellectum possibilem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e133">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>2. Item, habet aliquid in se per quod educitur
<lb ed="#Qb"/>de potentia in actum in genere intellectus, et
<lb ed="#Qb"/>hic est intellectus agens<!--3-->; ergo habet intellectum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>agentem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e145">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>3. Item<!--g-->, compositus est ex materia intelligibili
<lb ed="#Qb"/>et forma intelligibili<!--h-->, et ex parte materiae est re<lb ed="#Qb"/>cipere
intelligibilia, ex parte formae facere; ergo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>habet intellectum possibilem et agentem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e156">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Contra: a. Intellectus possibilis in nobis est re<lb ed="#Qb"/>spectu
specierum abstrahendarum a phantasma<lb ed="#Qb"/>tibus;
sed phantasmata sensibilia non sunt in
<lb ed="#Qb"/>angelis; ergo intellectus possibilis per hanc viam
<lb ed="#Qb"/>non est in angelis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e169">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>b. Item, intellectus materialis impedimentum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quoddam recipit per laesionem cuiusdam partis
<lb ed="#Qb"/>cerebri; sed intellectus in angelis nullo corporeo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>impeditur; ergo intellectus materialis sive possi<lb ed="#Qb"/>bilis
non est in angelis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e182">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>c. Item, quaedam colligatio est intellectus possi<lb ed="#Qb"/>bilis
sive materialis cum virtutibus sensibilibus;
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sed in angelo nulla est vis colligata habens de<lb ed="#Qb"/>pendentiam
ab illis; ergo non est intellectus pos<lb ed="#Qb"/>sibilis
vel materialis in angelis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e195">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod dicendum quod intellectus
<lb ed="#Qb"/>possibilis est in<!--i--> angelis, sed non secundum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>omnem modum secundum quem<!--k--> est in animabus
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>rationalibus<!--l-->. Habet enim angelus intellectum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>possibilem ad recipiendum cognitionem a Deo et
<lb ed="#Qb"/>etiam ab angelis superioribus, si superiores habet;
<lb ed="#Qb"/>habet etiam<!--m--> intellectum possibilem ad capiendum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>notitiam istorum inferiorum, sed non illo modo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quo intellectus possibilis humanus: intellectus
<lb ed="#Qb"/>enim possibilis humanus indiget ministerio sensus
<lb ed="#Qb"/>praeambulo et ministerio virtutum sensibilium,
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quod non est in angelo, et ideo dissimiliter di<lb ed="#Qb"/>citur
ex illa parte possibilis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e228">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Ad primo<!--n--> obiectum ergo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dicendum quod, licet habeat intellectum possibilem,
<lb ed="#Qb"/>non tamen respectu specierum abstrahendarum a
<lb ed="#Qb"/>phantasmatibus, nec respectu agentis abstrahentis
<lb ed="#Qb"/>species a phantasmatibus nec indiget memoriis
<lb ed="#Qb"/>praecedentibus vel sensibus nec impeditur per<!--o-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>impedimentum corporei instrumenti, sicut dicitur
<lb ed="#Qb"/>in iis qui habent maniacam<!--p--> passionem: non
<lb ed="#Qb"/>enim intellectus possibilis in angelis separabilis
<lb ed="#Qb"/>tantum est a corpore vel ab actu sensibilium vi<lb ed="#Qb"/>rium,
sed separatus est, et ideo non occurrit ei
<lb ed="#Qb"/>impedimentum ex parte illa.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q1t1c3-d1e258">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>2—3. Ad illud<!--q--> quod quaeritur de intellectu
<lb ed="#Qb"/>agente: dicendum<!--r--> quod intellectus agentis pro<lb ed="#Qb"/>prie
sumpti est educere potentiam intelligendi in
<lb ed="#Qb"/>actum, et hoc per abstractionem specierum a
<lb ed="#Qb"/>phantasmatibus. In angelo<!--s--> autem non est acceptio
<lb ed="#Qb"/>specierum per abstractionem a phantasmatibus:
<lb ed="#Qb"/>unde quantum ad hanc conditionem non dicitur
<lb ed="#Qb"/>intellectus angeli agens. Sumendo autem commu<lb ed="#Qb"/>nius
intellectum agentem, prout agentis est edu<lb ed="#Qb"/>cere
potentiam intelligendi in actum per acceptio<lb ed="#Qb"/>nem
quamdam specierum, intellectus angeli potest
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dici agens.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>