-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2.xml
212 lines (212 loc) · 12.3 KB
/
ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 3, T. 1, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 3, T. 1, C. 2</title>
<date when="2017-06-27">June 27, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qb" n="quaracchi1928">Quaracchi 1928</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-06-27" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Qb" n="254"/>
<cb ed="#Qb" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Hd1e107">Ia-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 3, T. 1, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Hd1e110" type="question-title">DE ACTU ANGELORUM PRAESIDENTIUM QUI EST REVELARE.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Habito de praesidentia. angeli super angelum,
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sequitur de actu qui pertinet ad praesidentes;
<lb ed="#Qb"/>actus autem ille est revelare quod apud se est.
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Potest<!--i--> ergo quaeri:
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Utrum necessaria sit ista revelatio quae fit
<lb ed="#Qb"/>mediantibus angelis;
<lb ed="#Qb"/>deinde, si revelatio sit a natura angelica;
<lb ed="#Qb"/>tertio, quomodo fiat revelatio.
</p>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Dd1e135" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Hd1e137">ARTICULUS I</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Hd1e140" type="question-title">Utrum necessaria sit ista reuelatio.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e143">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Quod non sit necessaria revelatio median<lb ed="#Qb"/>tibus
angelis, videtur: 1. Eo quod unus<lb ed="#Qb"/>quisque
angelus tenet imaginem sive similitu<lb ed="#Qb"/>dinem
Dei et non alterius angeli; cum ergo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>revelatio fiat a summa sapientia ipsi angelo; in
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quantum tenet imaginem eius, quod autem fac<lb ed="#Qb"/>tum
est ad; imaginem Dei nulla interposita
<lb ed="#Qb"/>creatura formatur<!--6-->, erit revelatio immediate a
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Deo, et ita non est necessarium quod median<lb ed="#Qb"/>tibus
superioribus angelis fiat reuelatio inferio<lb ed="#Qb"/>ribus
angelis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e169">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Contra: a. in <title>Commento super Hierarchiam</title><!--7-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Qd1e173">Superiores revelant interioribus secundum ea
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quae noverunt a Deo</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e179">
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Solutio]: Ad hoc dicendum quod superiores
<lb ed="#Qb"/>revelant inferioribus.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e189">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Ad obiectum autem in con<lb ed="#Qb"/>trarium,
dicendum quod, licet dicatur, in libro <title>De
<lb ed="#Qb"/>anima et spiritu</title><!--9-->, quod ita facta est anima ad
<lb ed="#Qb"/>imaginem Dei<!--k--> ut nulla interposita creatura for<lb ed="#Qb"/>metur,
et eodem modo posset dici de angelo vel
<lb ed="#Qb"/>multo magis, nihilominus tamen angelus, potest
<lb ed="#Qb"/>formari quoad revelationem mediante alio an<lb ed="#Qb"/>gelo.
Sed est quaedam formatio per gratiam
<lb ed="#Qb"/>gratum facientem, et ilia non requiri mediatio<lb ed="#Qb"/>nem
creaturae: unde in illa non est angelus su<lb ed="#Qb"/>perior
mediator respectu inferioris. Est alia for<lb ed="#Qb"/>matio
quantum ad cognitionem, et haec dicitur
<pb ed="#Qb" n="255"/>
<cb ed="#Qb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dupliciter: vel ratione formae ultimae vel ratione<!--a-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dispositionis ad formam ultimam. Sicut ergo di<lb ed="#Qb"/>citur
<title>Matth.</title> 23,8: <quote>Unus esl <name ref="#Lombard">Magister</name> vester</quote>, nihi<lb ed="#Qb"/>lominus
sunt et plures, et sicut dicit <name>Augusti<lb ed="#Qb"/>nus</name>,
in libro<!--b--> <title>De Magistro</title><!--1-->, illi plures ma<lb ed="#Qb"/>gistri
non sunt nisi disponentes, summus autem
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/><name ref="#Lombard">Magister</name> dat perfectionem, <title>I Cor.</title> 3,6: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Qd1e245" source="http://scta.info/resource/Icor3_6">Ego plan<lb ed="#Qb"/>tavi,
Apollo rigavit, Deus autem incrementum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dedit</quote>, ita in angelis videtur. quod superiores dis<lb ed="#Qb"/>ponunt,
summa vero sapientia ultimam perfec<lb ed="#Qb"/>tionem
cognitionis dat: unde revelare dicuntur
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ministerio, non auctoritate.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Dd1e260" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Hd1e262">ARTICULUS II</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Hd1e265" type="question-title">Utrum illa revelatio sit a natura angelica.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e268">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Secundo quaeritur si revelatio sit a natura an<lb ed="#Qb"/>gelica.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e275">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Et videtur quod non sit a natura: 1. Reve<lb ed="#Qb"/>latio
enim nihil aliud videtur esse quam illumi<lb ed="#Qb"/>natio;
sed illuminatio non est in angelis nisi per
<lb ed="#Qb"/>gratiam; ergo nec revelatio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e286">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Contra: a. Loqui est in angelis, etiam si non
<lb ed="#Qb"/>adesset gratia: loquuntur enim boni bonis et<!--c-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>mali malis, sicut dicit <name>B. Gregorius</name><!--2-->; sed
<lb ed="#Qb"/>loqui ponit revelare cum quodam addito: revelare
<lb ed="#Qb"/>enim<!--d--> est dare cognitionem, loqui vero<!--e--> dare
<lb ed="#Qb"/>cognitionem mediante signo; ergo revelare est
<lb ed="#Qb"/>in angelis, etsi non adsit gratia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e305">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>b. Item, <name>Ioannes Damascenus</name><!--3-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Qd1e309">Qui emi<lb ed="#Qb"/>nent,
interioribus tradunt cognitionem secundum
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>eminentiam ordinis et naturae</quote>; sed tradere co<lb ed="#Qb"/>gnitionem
non est aliud quam revelare; ergo re<lb ed="#Qb"/>velatio
fit ipsis interioribus angelis a superiori<lb ed="#Qb"/>bus
secundum conditionem naturae.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e325">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod dicendum<!--4--> quod reve<lb ed="#Qb"/>latio
potest esse de iis quae superiores angeli
<lb ed="#Qb"/>accipiunt in ipso Verbo, in quo vident ea
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quae sibi revelat Verbum: et secundum hunc
<lb ed="#Qb"/>modum revelatio est a gratia et bene dicitur
<lb ed="#Qb"/>idem quod illuminatio<!--5-->. Alio vero modo di<lb ed="#Qb"/>citur
revelatio eorum quae sibi nota sunt se<lb ed="#Qb"/>cundum
se et sunt incognita alii: et secundum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>hunc modum revelant superiores angeli infe<lb ed="#Qb"/>rioribus
ea de quibus plus noverunt quam in<lb ed="#Qb"/>feriores,
eo quod maius est posse eorum quam
<lb ed="#Qb"/>inferiorum.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Dd1e356" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Hd1e358">ARTICULUS III</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Hd1e361" type="question-title">Quomodo fiat haec revelatio.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e364">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Tertio quaeritur quomodo fiat revelatio, utrum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>scilicet per medium vel sine medio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e371">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Et videtur quod non sine medio: 1. Hoc enim
<lb ed="#Qb"/>videtur esse solius Dei. Dicit enim <name>Bernardus</name><!--6-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-Qd1e379">solus Deus per se ipsum coniungitur spi<lb ed="#Qb"/>ritualibus
creaturis</quote>. Si ergo angelus revelat an<lb ed="#Qb"/>gelo,
hoc erit per medium; medium autem, vel
<lb ed="#Qb"/>est corporale vel<!--f--> spirituale; corporale non potest
<lb ed="#Qb"/>esse, cum extrema sint spiritualia; si vero est Spi<lb ed="#Qb"/>rituale,
aut est substantia ante accidens; substan<lb ed="#Qb"/>tia
autem non est: non enim est nisi triplex sub<lb ed="#Qb"/>stantia
spiritualis, divina, angelica et<!--h--> humana;
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sed nulla istarum est hic medium: non enim inter
<lb ed="#Qb"/>angelum et angelum est Deus medium secundum
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>naturam, nec inter angelum et angelum anima, nec
<lb ed="#Qb"/>inter angelum et angelum alius angelus; medium
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ergo illud est accidens; sed nullum accidens est
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quod non sit in aliquo subiecto; ergo illud accidens
<lb ed="#Qb"/>vel erit in uno angelo vel in alio: in tertia enim
<lb ed="#Qb"/>substantia esse non potest; sed si est in altero
<lb ed="#Qb"/>angelo, non computatur ut medium, sed extremum;
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ergo revelatio huiusmodi non fit per medium.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai2t3s2q3t1c2-d1e422">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Solutio] Ad quod dicendum<!--7--> quod huiusmodi
<lb ed="#Qb"/>revelatio fit per medium et per medium spiri<lb ed="#Qb"/>tuale,
non tamen est medium sicut est inter vi<lb ed="#Qb"/>sibile
et ipsum visum, nec semper est medium
<lb ed="#Qb"/>signum sive nutus intelligibilis, sed ipsa commu<lb ed="#Qb"/>nicatio
speciei intelligibilis, quae aut in revelante
<lb ed="#Qb"/>et eo cui revelatur.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>