-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1.xml
209 lines (209 loc) · 12.4 KB
/
ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, Q. 1, C. 1</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, Q. 1, C. 1</title>
<date when="2017-06-27">June 27, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qb" n="quaracchi1928">Quaracchi 1928</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-06-27" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Qb" n="367"/>
<cb ed="#Qb" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-Hd1e107">Ia-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, Q. 1, C. 1</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-Hd1e110" type="question-title">DE VERBIS <mentioned>COMPLEVIT DEUS DIE SEPTIMO</mentioned>.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Circa illud vero quod est septimi<!--f--> diei I. primo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quaeritur quare <quote>septimo die complevit</quote>, cum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>completio sive perfectio in sex diebus intelligere<lb ed="#Qb"/>tur;
unde praemissum est<!--e--><!--3-->: <quote>Perfecti sunt caeli</quote> etc.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e124">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Respondeo: Est completio secundum materiam
<lb ed="#Qb"/>et formam, et haec fuit in sex diebus<!--4-->; et<!--g--> est
<lb ed="#Qb"/>completio in fine, et haec intelligitur in septimo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>die secundum quod omnia opera<!--h--> acceperunt
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quietem in eo qui est finis omnium<!--5-->, prout dicitur
<title>Prov.</title> 16,4: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-Qd1e137" ana="prov16_4">Universa propter semetipsum operatus
<lb ed="#Qb"/>est<!--i--> Dominus</quote>. Vel perfectio in sexto die fuit
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quantum ad genera et<!--k--> species rerum<!--6-->, haec au<lb ed="#Qb"/>tem
completio quantum ad gubernationem et mul<lb ed="#Qb"/>tiplicationem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e149">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>II. Quaeritur etiam quare in<!--l--> isto die non di<lb ed="#Qb"/>citur
sicut in praecedentibus<!--7-->: <quote>Factum est ve<lb ed="#Qb"/>spere
et mane dies</quote> septimus. Numquid ista dies
<lb ed="#Qb"/>non<!--m--> habuit mane nec vespere?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e161">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Solutio]: Ideo ita videtur <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name><!--8--> par<lb ed="#Qb"/>tiri
dies istos, ut primus dies haberet vesperam
<lb ed="#Qb"/>et<!--n--> non mane, medii<!--o--> mane et vesperam, ultimus
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>vero mane et non vesperam. Nam secundum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quod dies designat cognitionem angelicae crea<lb ed="#Qb"/>turae,
angelica autem creatura non poterat co<lb ed="#Qb"/>gnoscere
antequam esset, non poterat cogno<lb ed="#Qb"/>scere<!--p-->
se faciendam in Verbo, quod ad mane
<lb ed="#Qb"/>pertinet, sed se factam in proprio genere<!--9-->; et ita
<lb ed="#Qb"/>vespere habuit et computatur cum illo mane se<lb ed="#Qb"/>quentis
diei, quia cognovit in Verbo firmamen<lb ed="#Qb"/>tum
faciendum et sic deinceps. Cum autem de<lb ed="#Qb"/>ventum
est ad septimum diem, vespere eius fuit
<lb ed="#Qb"/>cognitio creaturarum sensibilium et ipsius homi<lb ed="#Qb"/>nis
in proprio genere, mane vero pertinebat ad
<lb ed="#Qb"/>cognitionem gubernationis et continuationis rerum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>in esse per multiplicationem; et quia illud, quan<lb ed="#Qb"/>tum
est de se, non habet finem, nisi cum adest
<lb ed="#Qb"/>voluntas Conditoris, ideo non habet vespere, sed
<lb ed="#Qb"/>mane. Unde <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, <title>Super Genesim</title><!--10-->;
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-Qd1e215">Etsi unaquaeque pars potest esse in toto cuius
<lb ed="#Qb"/>pars est, ipsum tamen totum non est nisi in
<lb ed="#Qb"/>illo a quo conditum est. Et ideo non absurde
<lb ed="#Qb"/>intelligitur, sexto die completo per eius vespe<lb ed="#Qb"/>ram,
factum mane, quo significaretur non initium
<pb ed="#Qb" n="368"/>
<cb ed="#Qb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>condendae alterius creaturae, sicut in ceteris, sed
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quo significaretur initium manendi et quiescendi
<lb ed="#Qb"/>totius quod conditum est in illius<!--a--> quiete qui<!--b-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>condidit; quae quies Deo nec initium habet nec
<lb ed="#Qb"/>terminum, creaturae autem habet initium, sed
<lb ed="#Qb"/>non habet terminum<!--c-->, et ideo septimus dies
<lb ed="#Qb"/>coepit et mane, sed nullo<!--d--> vespere terminatur<!--e--></quote>.
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Unde, quia mane septimi diei computatur in
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sexto die<!--f-->, in septimo nulla fit mentio nec de
<lb ed="#Qb"/>mane nec de vespere: neque enim de initio vel
<lb ed="#Qb"/>fine alicuius creaturae distincte ibi agitur.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e255">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>III. Si vero non ad diem spiritualem haec refe<lb ed="#Qb"/>ramus,
quid dicendum est de die septimo, qui sub
<lb ed="#Qb"/>alia forma designatur quam alii? Cum enim dies
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dicatur ad modum aliorum, dies autem fit secun<lb ed="#Qb"/>dum
revolutionem alicuius lucis super terram, ne<lb ed="#Qb"/>cesse
est quod habeat mane et vesperam. Quare
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ergo non dicitur septimo die de mane et vespere
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sicut in: praecedentibus?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e275">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod videtur dicendum<!--1--> quod, li<lb ed="#Qb"/>cet
iste dies sicut et<!--g--> praecedens habeat mane et
<lb ed="#Qb"/>vespere, tamen in isto die non fit expressio sicut
<lb ed="#Qb"/>in praecedentibus, ne credatur requies Dei in se
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ipso habere principium et finem sicut creaturae, de
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quibus actum est in aliis diebus, habuerunt prin<lb ed="#Qb"/>cipium
et finem; et ideo dies dicitur sine aliqua
<lb ed="#Qb"/>distinctione, ut notetur plena illius requiei illu<lb ed="#Qb"/>minatio,
in qua nihil oritur, nihil occidit.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e299">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>IV. Sed adhuc quaeritur: si dies septimus dici<lb ed="#Qb"/>tur
dies secundum unam rationem cum aliis, et alii
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dies conditi sint<!--h-->, ergo et iste conditus est, ergo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>aliquid conditum est in septimo die; qualiter ergo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dicta sunt omnia facta esse in sex diebus et in
<lb ed="#Qb"/>septimo quievisse?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e315">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Respondeo<!--2-->: Cum dicitur quievisse, intelligitur
<lb ed="#Qb"/>cessasse a condendis generibus et speciebus re<lb ed="#Qb"/>rum;
et huic non est contrarium quod diem
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>condidit, quia haec est conditio secundum nume<lb ed="#Qb"/>rum;
a rebus autem permanentibus quievit, sicut
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sunt genera et species rerum subsistentium.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e333">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>V. 1. Sed quid est quod dicitur <title>Ioan.</title> 5,17: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-Qd1e337" source="http://scta.info/resource/io5_17">Pa<lb ed="#Qb"/>ter
meus usque modo operatur et ego operor?</quote>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Ergo non videtur quievisse ab omni opere.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e346">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>2. Praeterea, non est quies aliqua Creatoris vel
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Conditoris summi in re<!--i--> condita; ergo nihil est
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quod dicitur<!--3-->: In septimo etc.<!--k-->, cum stabile
<lb ed="#Qb"/>nullatenus<!--l--> quiescat in vano.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e357">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>3. Item, dicitur quod cessavit <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-Qd1e361">ab omni opere
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quod creavit ut faceret</quote>; et illud <mentioned>facere</mentioned> est ope<lb ed="#Qb"/>rari;
ergo non quievit ab omni opere.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e369">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Solutio: 1. Ad primum<!--m--> dicendum quod illud
<lb ed="#Qb"/>operari, de quo dicitur <title>Ioan.</title> 5, 17, intelligitur de opere
<lb ed="#Qb"/>gubernationis et multiplicationis, non de opere con<lb ed="#Qb"/>ditionis
generum et specierum, a quo scilicet quievit.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e380">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>2. Ad secundum dicendum quod, licet quie<lb ed="#Qb"/>verit
ab opere iam dicto, non tamen in illo quievit,
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sed magis e converso opus quievit in eo<!--n--> in
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quantum est finis. De hoc <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, <title>Super
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Genesim</title><!--4--> <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-Qd1e396"> Ipsa universitas creaturae, quae sex
<lb ed="#Qb"/>diebus consummata est, aliud habet in sua na<lb ed="#Qb"/>tura,
aliud in suo ordine quo in Deo est, non<!--o-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sicut Deus, sed tamen ita ut ei<!--p--> quies propriae
<lb ed="#Qb"/>stabilitatis non sit nisi in illius quiete qui nihil
<lb ed="#Qb"/>praeter se appetit quo adepto requiescat. Et ideo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dum ipse manet in se, quidquid ex illo est retor<lb ed="#Qb"/>quet
ad se, ut omnis creatura in se habeat naturae
<lb ed="#Qb"/>suae terminum<!--q-->, quo non sit quod ipse est, in illo
<lb ed="#Qb"/>autem quietis locum, quo servet quod<!--r--> ipsa est </quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai3t3q1c1-d1e419">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>3. Ad tertium dicendum quod, cum dicitur:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote>Creavit ut faceret</quote>, creare sumitur ibi pro condere<!--5-->.
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Duplex autem est condere, scilicet in esse generis
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sui vel speciei et<!--s--> in permanentia ratione multipli<lb ed="#Qb"/>cationis
individuorum, ubi necessaria est multipli<lb ed="#Qb"/>catio
ad conservationem; condidit ergo Deus ut sic
<lb ed="#Qb"/>faceret, id est<!--t--> multiplicaret ad conservationem.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>