-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2.xml
140 lines (140 loc) · 7.85 KB
/
ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 4, Tract. 1, S. 1, Q. 2, T. 1, M. 2, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Ia-IIae, Inq. 4, Tract. 1, S. 1, Q. 2, T. 1, M. 2, C. 2</title>
<date when="2017-06-27">June 27, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qb" n="quaracchi1928">Quaracchi 1928</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-06-27" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Qb" n="393"/>
<cb ed="#Qb" n="a"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2-Hd1e107">Ia-IIae, Inq. 4, Tract. 1, S. 1, Q. 2, T. 1, M. 2, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2-Hd1e110" type="question-title">UTRUM ANIMA EVAE CREATA FUERIT IN OPERE SEXTI DIEI<!--1--></head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2-d1e113">
<pb ed="#Qb" n="393"/>
<cb ed="#Qb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Deinde quaeritur de anima Evae utrum<!--a--> fuerit
<lb ed="#Qb"/>creata in<!--b--> opere sexti diei.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2-d1e124">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Quod videtur 1. per hoc quod dicitur<!--2-->: <quote>Crea<lb ed="#Qb"/>vit
hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem suam,
<lb ed="#Qb"/>masculum et feminam creavit eos</quote>. Ergo non tantum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>conditus est Adam, sed et<!--c--> Eva. Si vero Eva
<lb ed="#Qb"/>creata est, hoc non est nisi secundum animam:
<lb ed="#Qb"/>secundum enim corpus qualiter posset intelligi
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ut simul fierent Adam et Eva<!--d--> secundum corpus
<lb ed="#Qb"/>et tamen unum corpus, scilicet Evae, esset de
<lb ed="#Qb"/>costa Adae? Si enim erat de costa formatum,
<lb ed="#Qb"/>tunc costa praecessit; quare Adam ante Evam
<lb ed="#Qb"/>est formatus; non ergo simul secundum corpus;
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ergo si erat ibi simultas, quod videtur per hoc
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quod sub quadam indistinctione dicitur, erat
<lb ed="#Qb"/>anima Evae condita in opere sexti diei.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2-d1e157">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Contra: a. Per supra dictam rationem<!--3--> <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2-Qd1e161">Anima
<lb ed="#Qb"/>creando infunditur</quote> etc.; ergo, cum corpus Evae
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sit de costa Adae, necesse fuit ut anima Evae
<lb ed="#Qb"/>posterius esset condita; ergo si corpus Evae for<lb ed="#Qb"/>matum
est post opera sex dierum, ergo et anima
<lb ed="#Qb"/>eius creata est post opera sex dierum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2-d1e177">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Respondeo 1. quod, si<!--e--> secundum rationem ma<lb ed="#Qb"/>ris
et feminae factus est homo in<!--f--> operibus sex
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dierum, non tantum Adam factus<!--g--> est secundum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>animam et corpus, sed et Eva similiter in opere
<lb ed="#Qb"/>sexti diei<!--h--><!--4-->, sed non simul in parte indivisibili
<lb ed="#Qb"/>diei illius, ut non sit contrarium quod dicitur con<lb ed="#Qb"/>sequenter
quod Eva formata est de latere viri et
<lb ed="#Qb"/>quod dicitur in <title>Eccli.</title><!--5-->: <quote>Creavit ex ipso adiutorium
<lb ed="#Qb"/>simile sibi</quote>, et sic omnia illa dicerentur per reca<lb ed="#Qb"/>pitulationem
quamdam ut maior fieret expressio<!--6-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2-d1e201">
<cb ed="#Qb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Cum enim fecit plantas et herbas in opere tertii<!--i-->
<lb ed="#Qb"/>diei, nonne tunc et ligna paradisi? Ergo pari
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ratione de aliis. — Vel potest dici quod Adam
<lb ed="#Qb"/>factus fuit<!--k--> in operibus sexti diei, tamen se<lb ed="#Qb"/>cundum
corpus, quia<!--l--> Adam fuit ratio condendi
<lb ed="#Qb"/>humani generis: de latere enim eius facta est
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Eva, de ipso autem et Eva humanum genus, et
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ita fuit principium humani generis; propter hoc
<lb ed="#Qb"/>potuit includi in illis operibus, a quibus Deus re<lb ed="#Qb"/>quievit
a<!--m--> condendo rationes rerum. Et secundum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>hoc respondendum esset ad hoc quod dicitur<!--7-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote>Masculum et feminam fecit eos</quote>, id est<!--n--> secundum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>corpus Adae materialiter, ex quo post formavit
<lb ed="#Qb"/>corpus Evae; vel fecit hominem ad hoc ut esset
<lb ed="#Qb"/>masculus et femina, et per illos<!--o--> genus humanum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>multiplicaretur.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Ai4t1s1q2t1m2c2-d1e240">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Aliqui<!--8--> dicebant quod anima utriusque erat
<lb ed="#Qb"/>creata in opere sexti diei, ut esset sensus: <quote>Mas<lb ed="#Qb"/>culum
et feminam fecit eos</quote>, id est animas con<lb ed="#Qb"/>didit
ad imaginem suam, tam maris quam femi<lb ed="#Qb"/>nae,
corpora vero post formata, sicut recitat
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Scriptura. — Sed tunc quaeritur quare non dic<lb ed="#Qb"/>tum
est de Eva, sicut de Adam: de Adam enim
<lb ed="#Qb"/>dicitur<!--p--><!--9-->: <quote>Formavit hominem de limo terrae et
<lb ed="#Qb"/>inspiravit</quote> etc., de Eva vero nihil dicitur quoad
<lb ed="#Qb"/>coniunctionem animae cum corpore. Si vero
<lb ed="#Qb"/>anima Evae<!--q--> esset per se primo creata et post
<lb ed="#Qb"/>suo corpori coniuncta, videretur<!--r--> similiter di<lb ed="#Qb"/>cendum;
non autem similiter est dictum; aliter
<lb ed="#Qb"/>ergo videtur ratio eorum<!--s--> ex parte Evae et ex
<lb ed="#Qb"/>parte Adae. Mihi verisimilius videtur dicendum
<lb ed="#Qb"/>secundum primum modum, salvo tamen iudicio
<lb ed="#Qb"/>melioris sententiae.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>