-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae.xml
103 lines (103 loc) · 5.87 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 2, S. 1, Praeambulum</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 2, S. 1, Praeambulum</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 2, Tract. 2, S. 1, Praeambulum</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae-d1e103">
<pb ed="#Qc" n="83"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Consequenter dicendum est de divisione peccati. Et primo accipienda est illa
<lb ed="#Qc"/>divisio materialis, quae fit secundum diversitatem subiectorum: peccatum
aliud est angeli, aliud<!--a--> hominis. Ratio autem est, quia in angelo primo fuit
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccatum, et per suggestionem angeli consequenter in homine, sicut habetur super illud:
<lb ed="#Qc"/><title>Eccli.</title> 10,14: <quote>Initium superbiae hominis</quote> etc., <title>Glossa</title><!--1-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae-Qd1e116">Non est maior apostasia quam
<lb ed="#Qc"/>creaturam a Creatore recedere, quae merito adscribitur superbiae; superbia enim est, si
<lb ed="#Qc"/>creatura velit assimilari Creatori: haec diabolo et homini fuit initium perditionis</quote>. Expo<lb ed="#Qc"/>nitur
etiam<!--b--> illud<!--2-->: <quote>Initium omnis peccati est superbia</quote>, de peccato ipsius diaboli, quia
<lb ed="#Qc"/>illud fuit initium omnium peccatorum, secundum unam expositionem<!--3-->, et ideo dicit Isi<lb ed="#Qc"/>dorus<!--4-->
quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae-Qd1e129">malum a diabolo fuit inventum</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae-d1e133">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Ratio autem divisionis huius haec est: creatura intellectualis vertibilis est secundum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>electionem, sicut dicit <name>Ioannes Damascenus</name><!--5-->; quod autem vertibile est secundum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>electionem, potest verti in malum; quod<!--c--> autem vertitur in malum, peccat; creatura
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ergo<!--d--> intellectualis, cum vertitur in malum<!--e--> secundum electionem, peccat; cum ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>tam angelus quam homo fuerit creatura intellectualis, erat<!--f--> utraque creatura vertibilis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>secundum electionem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae-d1e149">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Forte diceret aliquis quod haec non debet esse prima divisio, quia utraque pars
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sub actuali peccato continetur; unde videtur illa esse prima <mentioned>peccatum aliud originale,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>aliud actuale</mentioned>. — Sed attendendum est quod originale processit ex actuali primi
<lb ed="#Qc"/>parentis, actuale vero primi parentis processit ex suggestione diaboli. Prima ergo mul<lb ed="#Qc"/>tiplicatio
peccati fuit secundum<!--g--> haec diversa subiecta, sequens vero multiplicatio in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>homine fuit per actuale et originale. Unde, licet divisiones sint excedentes et excessae,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>tamen<!--h-->, quia originale originem sumpsit aliunde, volentibus investigare<!--i--> peccatum se<lb ed="#Qc"/>cundum
originem peccati, primo occurrit dicere de peccato angeli sive angelorum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae-d1e169">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Circa quod quaeruntur duo:
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Primo, de<!--k--> peccato eius et pertinentibus ad ipsum;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>secundo, de peccato eius in comparatione ad hominem, quo<!--l--> scilicet invidens ho<lb ed="#Qc"/>mini
tentavit ipsum et adhuc tentare non cessat.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae-d1e181">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Ad cognitionem vero primi peccati, primo considerandum est de ipso peccato in se;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>deinde, de ipsa poena peccati.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi2t2s1prae-d1e188">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Peccatum vero angeli aut fuit peccatum Luciferi aut aliorum angelorum<!--m-->, ei in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccato consentientium.
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Primo ergo dicendum est de peccato Luciferi;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>deinde, de peccato aliorum.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>