-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4.xml
107 lines (107 loc) · 5.09 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, T. 1, C. 4</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, T. 1, C. 4</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, T. 1, C. 4</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-Hd1e103" type="question-title">UTRUM IGNORANTIA CONCOMITETUR QUODCUMQUE PECCATUM.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-d1e106">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Quarto quaeritur si ignorantia concomitetur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quodcumque peccatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Quod non, videtur. a. Aliquis<!--o--> enim scienter
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccat; ergo non est ibi ignorantia illa qua ignorat
<pb ed="#Qc" n="327"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>esse peccatum nec est ignorantia in conditio<lb ed="#Qc"/>nibus
personae aut actus: potest enim contin<lb ed="#Qc"/>gere
quod habeat scientiam harum vel<!--a--> illarum;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ergo ignorantia non concomitatur quodcumque
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-d1e135">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Contra. 1. Dicit <name>Philosophus</name><!--1--> quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-Qd1e139">omnis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>malus ignorat</quote>, et loquitur de ignorantia conco<lb ed="#Qc"/>mitante
peccatum; ergo est ignorantia concomi<lb ed="#Qc"/>tans
omne peccatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-d1e150">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Item, voluntas et ratio ita coniuncta sunt, ut,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cum voluntas deficit volendo<!--b-->, tunc ratio deficit
<lb ed="#Qc"/>in eligendo<!--c-->; sed defectus in electione est igno<lb ed="#Qc"/>rantia,
defectus autem in voluntate est peccatum;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ergo ignorantia concomitatur peccatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-d1e163">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: 1. Ad quod dicendum quod igno<lb ed="#Qc"/>rantia
uno modo concomitatur peccatum et<!--d--> alio
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>modo non. Secundum enim quod ignorantia est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>in speculativo intellectu, non<!--e--> est necesse igno<lb ed="#Qc"/>rantiam
esse semper cum peccato, sicut in theo<lb ed="#Qc"/>logis,
qui cognitionem habent faciendorum et ni<lb ed="#Qc"/>hilominus
peccant. Est autem alia ignorantia,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quae est in intellectu practico, secundum quam
<lb ed="#Qc"/>aliquis, cum peccat, non habet experientiam
<lb ed="#Qc"/>boni vel non habet electionem boni, quae prae<lb ed="#Qc"/>cedit
experientiam, et hoc modo <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-Qd1e191">omnis ma<lb ed="#Qc"/>lus
ignorat</quote>. Et sic intelligitur illud <name>Philo<lb ed="#Qc"/>sophi</name>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t1c4-d1e199">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Ex hoc etiam patet illud<!--f--> quod postea ob<lb ed="#Qc"/>iectum
est. Unde secundum hunc modum igno<lb ed="#Qc"/>rantia
concomitatur peccatum, secundum alium
<lb ed="#Qc"/>modum est quoddam peccatum ex ignorantia et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non omne.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>