-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9.xml
136 lines (136 loc) · 7.72 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 9</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 9</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 2, S. 1, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 9</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Hd1e103" type="question-title">UTRUM, QUANTUMCUMQUE SIT HOMO PERFECTUS, SEMPER OMITTAT.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-d1e106">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Nono quaeritur utrum quantumlibet perfectus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>semper omittat.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>1. Dicit enim <name>Origenes</name>, <title>Super Exodum</title><!--4-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Qd1e117">Quantum quis potest, tantum<!--a--> debet</quote>. Sed
<lb ed="#Qc"/>nullus potest tantum<!--b--> facere quantum debet;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ergo semper omittit<!--c-->, quia tenetur tantum iacere
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quantum debet, et non facit.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-d1e127">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Item, ad <title>Rom.</title> 13, 10, super illud: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Qd1e131" source="http://scta.info/resource/rom13_10">Plenitudo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>legis est dilectio</quote>, <title>Glossa</title><!--5-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Qd1e136">Caritas quanto
<lb ed="#Qc"/>magis solvitur, tanto magis debetur</quote>. Ergo quanto
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quis<!--d--> magis diligit, tanto magis diligere tenetur;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>minus ergo diligit semper quam debeat<!--e-->; ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>semper omittit.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-d1e150">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>3. Item, <title>Luc.</title> 17, 10: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Qd1e154" source="http://scta.info/resource/lc17_10">Cum omnia bene feceritis,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicite quoniam servi inutiles estis</quote>. Sed servus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>inutilis non adimplet quod tenetur; ergo, eum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>omnia <quote>bene feceritis</quote><!--f-->, nondum quantum tenemini
<lb ed="#Qc"/>adimplevistis; ergo omisistis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-d1e166">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Respondeo<!--g-->: 1. Ad primum dicendum quod,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cum dicitur <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Qd1e172">quantum quis potest boni, tantum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>debet</quote>, intelligendum est quod duplex est de<lb ed="#Qc"/>bitum:
ratione accepti et ratione praecepti. Ra<lb ed="#Qc"/>tione
accepti<!--h--> est hoc verum quod dicitur
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Qd1e182">quantum quis potest boni, tantum debet</quote>,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>hoc est ex quanto posse vel ratione quantae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>potentiae. Si vero ratione praecepti, secundum<!--i-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>hoc non est verum <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Qd1e191">quantum quis boni po<lb ed="#Qc"/>test,
tantum debet</quote> vel <mentioned>quod boni quis po<lb ed="#Qc"/>test,
hoc debet</mentioned>. Cum autem<!--k--> subditur <mentioned>nul<lb ed="#Qc"/>lus
potest tantum facere quantum debet, ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>omittit</mentioned>, intelligendum est quod omissio<!--l--> non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>respicit debitum ex accepto, sed ex praecepto;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>potest autem unusquisque facere quod debet
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ex praecepto, et ita non omittit; emissio etiam<!--m-->,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sicut dictum est<!--6-->, non respicit circumstantiam,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sed genus actionis, secundum quod est in prae<lb ed="#Qc"/>cepto<!--n-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-d1e217">
<pb ed="#Qc" n="341"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Ad secundum vero dicendum quod illa
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ratio non concludit quod homo omittat, sed quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>homo imperfectus est in diligendo, dum est in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>via: non enim potest diligere omnino<!--a--> <quote>ex toto
<lb ed="#Qc"/>corde et ex tota anima et ex tota mente</quote><!--1-->; et ideo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicit N, in libro <title>De perfectione iu<lb ed="#Qc"/>stitiae</title><!--2-->:
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Qd1e238">Cur non praeciperetur homini ista per<lb ed="#Qc"/>fectio,
quamvis eam in hac vita nemo habeat?
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Non enim recte curritur, si, quo currendum est,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>nesciatur; quo modo autem sciretur<!--b-->, si nullis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>praeceptis ostenderetur? Sic ergo curramus ut
<lb ed="#Qc"/>comprehendamus<!--3--></quote>. Et praemittitur<!--4-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-Qd1e251">Cum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>adhuc aliquid carnalis concupiscentiae est, quod
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>continendo frenetur<!--c-->, non omni modo ex tota
<lb ed="#Qc"/>anima diligitur Deus</quote>. Et ideo non sequitur quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>omittat, sid minus diligit quam debeat, sed si
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non diligeret.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t2s1q2t2c9-d1e268">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>3. Ad tertium vero<!--f--> dicendum quod repu<lb ed="#Qc"/>tatio
servi inutilis non est quia non facit quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>tenetur facere vel quantum, sed dicitur servus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>inutilis quia<!--g--> non venit ad perfectum. Alio vero
<lb ed="#Qc"/>modo<!--h--> dicitur servus inutilis quia<!--i--> non facit quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>tenetur facere, et sic non accipitur ibi. Quod patet
<lb ed="#Qc"/>per hoc quod additur<!--k-->: <quote>Quod debuimus facere, fe<lb ed="#Qc"/>cimus</quote>,
quasi dicat: in praeceptis non deiecimus,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sed perfectionem consiliorum non adimplevimus.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>