-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2.xml
183 lines (183 loc) · 10.6 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 1, Q. 3, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 1, Q. 3, C. 2</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 1, Q. 3, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Hd1e103" type="question-title">UTRUM SECUNDUM CONSENSUM RATIONIS TUM INFERIORIS, TUM SUPERIORIS, <lb ed="#Qb"/>SIT MORTALE PECCATUM AN VENIALE ALIQUANDO.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-d1e106">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Secundo quaeritur, cum' sit duplex consensus,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>utrum secundum utrumque sit mortale pecca<lb ed="#Qc"/>tum
an veniale aliquando.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-d1e115">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>I. Et videtur quod veniale sit in inferiori
<lb ed="#Qc"/>parte, 1. per hoc quod dicit <name>Augustinus</name><!--4-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Qd1e123">Si
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cum<!--d--> cogitatione mens oblectatur illicitis, non de<lb ed="#Qc"/>cernens
esse iacienda, tenens tamen et volvens li<lb ed="#Qc"/>benter
quae statim ut attigerunt animum, respui
<lb ed="#Qc"/>debuerunt, non negandum est esse peccatum, sed
<lb ed="#Qc"/>longe minus quam si opere statuatur implendum.
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Et ideo de talibus cogitationibus venia est petenda
<lb ed="#Qc"/>pectusque percutiendum atque dicendum<!--5-->: <quote>Di<lb ed="#Qc"/>mitte
nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>debitoribus nostris</quote></quote>. Sed ad venialia quaedam
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccata<!--e--> delenda dicitur valere oratio Dominica<!--6-->;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est igitur<!--f--> huiusmodi veniale peccatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-d1e151">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Sed videtur contrarium, a. per hoc quod sub<lb ed="#Qc"/>iungit
<name>Augustinus</name><!--7-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Qd1e157">Una persona unusque
<lb ed="#Qc"/>homo totus damnabitur nisi haec, quae<!--g--> sine vo<lb ed="#Qc"/>luntate
perpetrandi, sed tamen cum voluntate
<lb ed="#Qc"/>animum<!--h--> talibus oblectandi<!--i-->, solius cogitationis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sentiuntur esse peccata, per Mediatoris gratiam
<lb ed="#Qc"/>remittantur</quote>. Sed damnatio non est nisi pro mor<lb ed="#Qc"/>tali
peccato; ergo huiusmodi fit mortale peccatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-d1e174">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>b. Similiter praemittitur ibidem<!--8-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Qd1e178">Si mulier
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sola cibum edisset illicitum, sola mortis supplicio
<lb ed="#Qc"/>plecteretur. Non ita dici potest in homine uno, si
<lb ed="#Qc"/>delectationibus illicitis, a quibus se continuo de<lb ed="#Qc"/>beret
avertere cogitatio, libenter pascatur sola,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>nec facienda decernantur mala, sed<!--k--> tantum in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>recordatione suaviter teneantur, quasi mulierem
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sine viro posse damnari</quote>. Ex quo accipitur<!--l-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quod pro huiusmodi peccato debetur damnatio;
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>damnatio autem non solet in Scriptura accipi
<lb ed="#Qc"/>nisi pro mortali peccato; ergo huiusmodi est mor<lb ed="#Qc"/>tale
peccatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-d1e208">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>II. Item, in superiori parte rationis quaeritur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>utrum fiat veniale peccatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-d1e215">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Quod non, videtur. 1. In illa enim parte est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>consummatio peccati; consummatio autem peccati
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est, cum est<!--m--> mortale peccatum; ergo in illa parte
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est tantum mortale peccatum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-d1e226">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Praeterea<!--N-->, <ref xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Rd1e230"><name>Magister</name>, in libro <title>Sententia</title><lb ed="#Qc"/>rum</ref><!--9-->:
<cit>
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Qd1e237" source="http://scta.info/resource/pl-l2d24c11-d1e105">Si adsit plena voluntas perficiendi, ut,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>si adsit facultas, ad effectum<!--o--> perducatur, vir
<lb ed="#Qc"/>manducat, quia superior pars rationis illecebrae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>consentit; tunc est enim<!--p--> damnabile et grave
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccatum</quote>
<bibl>
<ref target="http://scta.info/resource/pl-l2d24c11-d1e105">Lombardus, Sent. II, d. 24, c. 11 [n. 1]</ref>
</bibl>
</cit>.
In superiori ergo parte rationis tan<lb ed="#Qc"/>tum
videtur esse differentia mortalis peccati.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-d1e258">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: I. Ad quod dicendum quod in inferiori
<lb ed="#Qc"/>parte potest esse et mortale peccatum et veniale,
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Qd1e264">cum mens oblectatur cum cogitatione in illicitis,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non decernens tamen esse facienda</quote>. Si enim<!--q--> re<lb ed="#Qc"/>pellitur
a superiori parte rationis, veniale est: et in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>remedium huiusmodi peccati valet tunsio pectoris
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cum oratione Dominica. Si autem progrediatur,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ut<!--r--> non a superiori parte post deliberationem
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sufficientem cohibeatur, dicitur mortale peccatum,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quando versatur delectatio circa genus mortalis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccati. Et hoc modo intelligitur illud<!--s--> quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>mulier non sine viro damnatur: iam enim est<!--t-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>consensus superioris partis vere vel interpretative.
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Difficillimum tamen est in hac parte fines venialis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccati et mortalis distinguere in subiecta mate<lb ed="#Qc"/>ria.
Et ideo volebant aliqui dicere quod, dum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est consensus ad delectandum et nullatenus ad
<pb ed="#Qc" n="387"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>perpetrandum opere, est veniale peccatum; dam<lb ed="#Qc"/>nationem
vero exponebant viri cum muliere per<!--a-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>punitionem in huiusmodi, ut punienda sit superior
<lb ed="#Qc"/>pars in praesenti sive poena temporali, quia non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cohibuit delectationes interioris partis sicut de<lb ed="#Qc"/>buit;
tunc autem damnatur vir cum muliere dam<lb ed="#Qc"/>natione
mortalis peccati, cum adest consensio<!--b-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>male utendi rebus quae per sensum<!--c--> corporis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sentiuntur, et <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Qd1e321">decernitur peccatum, ut, si pote<lb ed="#Qc"/>stas
sit, opere compleatur<!--1--></quote>: tunc enim, secundum
<lb ed="#Qc"/><name>Augustinum</name><!--2-->, <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Qd1e329">mulier intelligenda est dedisse
<lb ed="#Qc"/>viro secum<!--d--> simul edendum illicitum cibum</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-d1e335">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>II. Ad id vero quod obicitur de superiori parte
<lb ed="#Qc"/>rationis, dicendum est quod aut superior pars
<lb ed="#Qc"/>rationis versatur circa genus venialis peccati aut
<lb ed="#Qc"/>circa genus mortalis peccati. Si versatur circa
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>genus venialis peccati<!--e-->, ut si consentit non cohi<lb ed="#Qc"/>bendo
membra ab otioso<!--f--> sermone, videtur esse<!--g-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>veniale peccatum. Si vero versatur circa genus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>mortalis peccati, consentiendo ut fiat, nec<!--h--> cohi<lb ed="#Qc"/>bendo
membra, mortale est peccatum. Quod autem
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicit <name>Augustinus</name> in superiori parte esse dam<lb ed="#Qc"/>nabile
et grave peccatum, intelligitur per quam<lb ed="#Qc"/>dam
coarctationem circa genus mortalis peccati<!--i-->:
<lb ed="#Qc"/>haec enim nomine illicitorum intelliguntur. Et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quia circa ista erat differentia sensualitatis infe<lb ed="#Qc"/>rioris
partis et superioris secundum veniale et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>mortale — nam in sensualitate veniale tantum,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sicut dicit <name>Magister</name> in libro <title>Sententiarum</title><!--3-->, in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>inferiori veniale et mortale, in superiori<!--k--> mortale
<lb ed="#Qc"/>tantum— ideo in superiori<!--l--> parte dixit tantum
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s1q3c2-Qd1e380">damnabile et grave esse<!--m--> peccatum</quote>.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>