-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5.xml
221 lines (221 loc) · 12.4 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 11, C. 5</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 11, C. 5</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 11, C. 5</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Hd1e103" type="question-title">DE COMPARATXONE PECCATI BLASPHEMIAE AD QUAEDAM ALIA PECCATA.</head>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Dd1e106" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Hd1e108">ARTICULUS I.</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Hd1e111" type="question-title">Utrum blasphemia sit maius peccatum aliis peccatis.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e114">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Quinto quaeritur de comparatione huius pec<lb ed="#Qc"/>cati
ad quaedam alia genera peccatorum vel
<lb ed="#Qc"/>specierum inter se.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e123">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Et primo ostenditur quod maius est pecca<lb ed="#Qc"/>tum
aliis peccatis. a. <title>Isai.</title> 18, 2: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Qd1e129" source="http://scta.info/resource/is18_2">Ad populum ter<lb ed="#Qc"/>ribilem</quote>,
<title>Glossa</title><!--1-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Qd1e134">Nihil horribilius blasphemia,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quae ponit os suum in caelum<!--2--></quote>. Ergo maius est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccatum aliis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e142">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>b. Item, <name>Richardus de S. Victore</name><!--3-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Qd1e146">Sce<lb ed="#Qc"/>leratissimum
genus peccati est<!--b-->, quando quis in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Dei vituperiis delectatur. Quid aliud est spiritus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>blasphemiae nisi affectatio<!--c--> et desiderium vitu<lb ed="#Qc"/>perationis
divinae?</quote> Cum ergo hoc genus pec<lb ed="#Qc"/>cati
sit blasphemia, erit maius aliis peccatis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e161">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Contra. 1. <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Qd1e165">Nolite exaltare cornu</quote><!--4-->, <title>Glossa</title><!--5-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Qd1e168">Maximum est vitium<!--d--> excusationis; nam quasi
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cornu erigit qui peccata sua per alios nititur ex<lb ed="#Qc"/>cusare,
ut per diabolum vel per<!--e--> alios suasores<!--f-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vel per necessitatem stellarum<!--g--></quote>. Ergo peccatum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>excusationis est maximum; non ergo blasphemia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e180">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Item, super illud<!--6-->: <quote>Non miserearis omni<lb ed="#Qc"/>bus
qui operantur iniquitatem</quote>, <title>Glossa</title><!--7-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Qd1e186">Est
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>defensio peccatorum, quando<!--h--> defendit homo quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Deus odit, de quo dicitur<!--8-->: <quote>Est peccatum ad mor<lb ed="#Qc"/>tem,
non pro ea dico, ut oret quis</quote></quote>. Sed pec<lb ed="#Qc"/>cato
ad mortem nullum<!--i--> est maius; ergo nec
<lb ed="#Qc"/>blasphemia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e202">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: a-b. Ad quod dicendum quod blasphe<lb ed="#Qc"/>mia,
prout accipitur pro spiritu blasphemiae, est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>maximum peccatum ex duplici ratione, quia iniuria
<lb ed="#Qc"/>fit Deo et<!--k--> quia ex malignitate peccatur. Maius est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ergo respectu illorum peccatorum quae non fiunt
<lb ed="#Qc"/>in Deum, et iterum quae fiunt, sed<!--l--> non ex
<lb ed="#Qc"/>malignitate: et sic accipiuntur praedictae aucto<lb ed="#Qc"/>ritates.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e222">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>1-2. Cum autem dicitur quod<!--m--> peccatum excu<lb ed="#Qc"/>sationis
est maximum, intelligendum est quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>maximum dicitur, quia aufert remedium peccati
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ex parte eius qui poenitere debet. Remedium
<lb ed="#Qc"/>enim peccati est accusatio ipsius peccatoris et<!--n-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>omnimoda confessio peccati; in hoc ergo genere
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicitur peccatum excusationis maximum. Ex altera
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vero parte blasphemia dicitur maximum, quia
<lb ed="#Qc"/>provocat oculos divinae maiestatis<!--9--> ad non mise<lb ed="#Qc"/>rendum
sive ad non remittendum.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Dd1e247" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Hd1e249">ARTICULUS II</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Hd1e252" type="question-title">Utrum blasphemia sit maius peccatum homicidio.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e255">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Deinde quaeritur utrum blasphemia sit maius
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccatum homicidio vel par.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e262">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Quod autem sit<!--o-->, videtur, a. per hoc quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicit <name>Augustinus</name><!--10-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Qd1e268">Non minus peccant qui
<lb ed="#Qc"/>blasphemant Christum regnantem in caelis quam
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>qui<!--p--> crucifixerunt ambulantem in terris</quote>. Sed
<lb ed="#Qc"/>qui crucifixerunt perpetraverunt grave homici<lb ed="#Qc"/>dium;
ergo blasphemia in<!--q--> Christum regnantem
<lb ed="#Qc"/>in caelis<!--r--> est par peccatum vel maius homicidio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e285">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>b. Ad idem, peccatum blasphemiae est con<lb ed="#Qc"/>tra
praeceptum primae tabulae, peccatum vero
<pb ed="#Qc" n="468"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>homicidii contra praeceptum secundae tabulae;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sed maius est praeceptum primae tabulae quam
<lb ed="#Qc"/>secundae; ergo maius est peccatum blasphemiae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quam homicidii.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e306">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Contra. 1. Homicidium omni genere est mortale
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccatum, cum est peccatum, et<!--a--> primum locum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>etiam tenet<!--b--> in poenis; blasphemia autem<!--c--> non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>omni genere est mortale nec semper debetur ei
<lb ed="#Qc"/>primus locus in poenis; ergo homicidium est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>maius peccatum blasphemia.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e322">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod dicendum quod maius<!--d-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>potest dici peccatum peccato secundum plures
<lb ed="#Qc"/>rationes: tum secundum rationem maioris libi<lb ed="#Qb"/>dinis,
tum secundum rationem maioris iniuriae,
tum secundum rationem<!--e--> maioris damni, tum
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>secundum rationem<!--f--> maioris reatus, id est obli<lb ed="#Qb"/>gationis
ad maiorem poenam. Secundum primum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>modum potest peccatum blasphemiae esse par
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccato homicidii, quia ex aequali libidine et exce<lb ed="#Qb"/>dentia
possunt esse et excessa. Quantum autem<!--g-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ad secundam rationem, maius<!--h--> est peccatum blas<lb ed="#Qb"/>phemiae
quam homicidii, quia fit maior iniuria
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ratione maioris status: status enim regnantis in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>caelis est maior statu<!--i--> ipsius regnantis in terris;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>praeterea, plus est<!--k--> auferre vitam gratiae quam
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vitam naturae. Quantum autem<!--l--> ad tertiam ratio<lb ed="#Qb"/>nem,
maius<!--m--> damnum consequitur essentialiter
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ipsum peccatum homicidii quam ipsum peccatum<!--n-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>blasphemiae, maior etiam poena temporalis de<lb ed="#Qc"/>betur<!--o-->
in criminis maioris detestatione.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Dd1e369">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Hd1e371">ARTICULUS III</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Hd1e374" type="question-title">Utrum blasphemare sit maius peccatum quam peierare.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e377">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Adhuc etiam quaeritur utrum blasphemare sit
<lb ed="#Qc"/>maius peccatum quam peierare<!--a-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e384">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Et videtur quod peierare sit maius pecca<lb ed="#Qb"/>tum,
1. quia<!--b--> qui peierat, nomen Dei sumit<!--c--> in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vanum et Deum assumit<!--d--> testem falsitatis; sed
<lb ed="#Qc"/>testis falsitatis non potest esse nisi falsus, et ita
<lb ed="#Qc"/>imponit Deo falsitatem; sed non omnis<!--e--> blas<lb ed="#Qb"/>phemans
dicit Deum esse mendacem, sedi ali<lb ed="#Qc"/>quid
aliud ei attribuit quod ei non convenit; ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>minor<!--g--> potest esse blasphemia periurio. Quae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>enim maior iniuria quam dicere Deum menda<lb ed="#Qc"/>cem,
cum si t summa veritas?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e406">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Contra. a. Super illud ad <title>Ephes.</title> 4, 31: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Qd1e410" source="http://scta.info/resource/eph4_31">Blas<lb ed="#Qc"/>phemia
tollatur a vobis</quote>, <title>Glossa</title><!--1-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-Qd1e415">Peius est
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>blasphemare quam peierare, quia peierando fal<lb ed="#Qb"/>sae
rei adhibetur testis Deus, blasphemando de
<lb ed="#Qc"/>se ipso falsa<!--h--> dicuntur</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q11c5-d1e428">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod dicendum quod blasphe<lb ed="#Qc"/>mia
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est maius peccatum in genere periurio, licet
<lb ed="#Qc"/>utrumque referatur ad praeceptum<!--i--> secundum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>primae tabulae secundum quemdam modum. Plus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>enim est falsum dicere de Deo<!--k--> quam dicere
<lb ed="#Qc"/>falsum de creatura cum assertione. Et, licet in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>periurio invocetur Deus testis, hoc non est quia
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Deus sit testis<!--l--> falsitatis, sed ut firmetur cre<lb ed="#Qb"/>dulitas
in eo cui iuratur<!--m-->. Nihilominus tamen
<lb ed="#Qc"/>aliqua blasphemia potest esse minor aliquo per<lb ed="#Qc"/>iurio,
et quia ex minori libidine procedat et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quia<!--n--> minoris sit damni.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>