-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3.xml
155 lines (155 loc) · 8.34 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 5, C. 3</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 5, C. 3</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 5, C. 3</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Hd1e103" type="question-title">DE COMPARATIONE MULTILOQUII AD ALIA PECCATA LOCUTIONIS.</head>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Dd1e106" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Hd1e108">ARTICULUS I.</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Hd1e111" type="question-title">Comparatio multiloquii ad stultitiam.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e114">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Tertio quaeritur de comparatione huius pec<lb ed="#Qc"/>cati
ad alia peccata locutionis. Et fit primo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>comparatio verbositatis ad stultitiam. Quaeritur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ergo quod illorum sit maius.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e125">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Videtur enim maius esse peccatum verbosi<lb ed="#Qc"/>tatis<!--k-->,
a. per hoc quod dicitur <title>Prov.</title><!--l--> 26, 12,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>super illud: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Qd1e133" source="http://scta.info/resource/prov26_12">Vidisti hominem sapientem sibi vi<lb ed="#Qc"/>deri</quote>
etc.<!--m-->, <title>Glossa</title><!--6-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Qd1e138">Grave<!--n--> est vitium stul<lb ed="#Qc"/>titiae,
sed non levius verbositatis</quote>, et minus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicit et<!--p--> plus significat, scilicet gravius. Ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccatum verbositatis est gravius peccato stul<lb ed="#Qc"/>titiae.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e151">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Contra. 1. Peccatum verbositatis offendit in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>multitudine sermonis, et ita peccat in quantitate,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccatum vero stultitiae peccat in qualitate<!--q-->;
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>deterior autem<!--r--> est defectus qualitatis debitae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quam quantitatis; ergo gravius est peccatum stul<lb ed="#Qc"/>titiae
quam verbositatis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e170">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod dicendum quod peccato<!--s-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>verbositatis non intelligitur quodcumque multilo<lb ed="#Qc"/>quium,
sed illud quo aliquis iactat se, cum<!--t-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sibi videatur sapiens, nec vult recipere alterius
<lb ed="#Qc"/>admonitionem. Stultitia vero dicitur peccatum,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cum aliquis verba fatua dicit et tamen<!--u--> verba
<lb ed="#Qc"/>correctionis accipit<!--v-->. Unde <title>Glossa</title><!--7-->: «<quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Qd1e187">Saepe
<lb ed="#Qc"/>contingit ut idiota aliquis citius<!--x--> verba correc<lb ed="#Qc"/>tionis
accipiat<!--y--> quam qui sua, quae novit vel
<lb ed="#Qc"/>nosse putat, magis<!--z--> iactat quam aliorum monita
<lb ed="#Qc"/>audiat</quote>. Si vero multiloquium tantum peccaret
<lb ed="#Qc"/>in quantitate et non in qualitate, minus posset
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dici peccatum peccato stultitiae.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Dd1e204" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Hd1e206">ARTICULUS II</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Hd1e209" type="question-title">De comparatione multiloquii ad vaniloquium.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e212">
<pb ed="#Qc" n="430"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Item, quaeritur de comparatione multiloquii
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ad vaniloquium, quod illorum dicatur maius pec<lb ed="#Qc"/>catum.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e225">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Et videtur quod vaniloquium<!--a-->. a. Vaniloquium
<lb ed="#Qc"/>enim privat finem debitum locutionis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e232">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>b. Praeterea, dicit <name>Isidorus</name><!--1-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Qd1e236">Sermo vanus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vanae conscientiae est index<!--b--></quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e243">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>c. Praeterea, dicit <name>Gregorius</name><!--2-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Qd1e247">Dum otiosa
<lb ed="#Qc"/>verba cavere negligimus, ad noxia pervenimus,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ut postmodum: detractionibus inhiemus</quote>. Sed
<lb ed="#Qc"/>haec sequela vaniloquii est gravissima et aliae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>circumstantiae praedictae; ergo peccatum vani<lb ed="#Qc"/>loquii
maius est peccato<!--c--> multiloquii: in multi<lb ed="#Qc"/>loquio
enim peccatum est ex defectu modi, de<lb ed="#Qc"/>fectus
autem modi minor est quam defectus finis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e266">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Contra. 1. Multiloquii sive loquacitatis po<lb ed="#Qc"/>sitae
sunt conditiones supra graviores<!--3-->, ut quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Qd1e274">non dirigetur, non iustificabitur vir verbosus</quote><!--4-->.
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Praeterea, <name>Gregorius</name><!--5--> dicit: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-Qd1e282">Valde difficile
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est ut qui multa loquitur, non mentiatur</quote>. Hae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>autem conditiones sunt graviores praedictis de
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vaniloquio; ergo multiloquium est gravius pec<lb ed="#Qc"/>catum
vaniloquio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q5c3-d1e294">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod dicendum<!--d--> quod, si in se
<lb ed="#Qc"/>considerentur sine conditionibus aggravantibus,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>maius malum est vaniloquium quam multilo<lb ed="#Qc"/>quium:
ponit enim defectum maioris boni. Si
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vero attendantur<!--e--> secundum conditiones adiunc<lb ed="#Qc"/>tas
aggravantes, possunt esse excedentia et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>excessa. Nam circumstantia aliqua potest esse
<lb ed="#Qc"/>aggravans ex parte multiloquii<!--f-->, utpote quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>admisceat falsitatem vel<!--g--> quod perveniat ad
<lb ed="#Qc"/>contemptum ex consuetudine, et secundum hoc
<lb ed="#Qc"/>multiloquium posset<!--h--> esse gravius aliquando<!--i-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vaniloquio. Hae<!--k--> tamen conditiones possunt
<lb ed="#Qc"/>etiam inesse<!--l--> vaniloquio, et tunc quoad hoc non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>diceretur unum maius altero.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>