-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8.xml
150 lines (150 loc) · 8.41 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 9, C. 8</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 9, C. 8</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 3, S. 2, Q. 9, C. 8</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-Hd1e103" type="question-title">DE EFFECTU PECCATI DETRACTIONIS.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-d1e106">
<lb ed="#Qb"/>Octavo quaeritur de effectu huius peccati.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-d1e109">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>I. Ponitur autem effectus huius peccati ex<lb ed="#Qc"/>caecatio,
secundum quod dicit <name>Gregorius</name><!--11-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-Qd1e115">Quid aliud<!--q--> detrahentes faciunt nisi quod in pul<lb ed="#Qc"/>verem
sufflant et in oculos suos terram excitant,
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ut unde plus detractionem<!--r--> perflant, inde<!--s--> ma<lb ed="#Qc"/>gis
nihil veritatis videant?</quote> Ex quo habetur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quod detractio excaecat ipsum detrahentem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-d1e129">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Sed videtur hoc falsum. 1. Aut enim detrahens
<lb ed="#Qc"/>imponit malitiam alteri, quam cognoscit inesse aut
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quam cognoscit non inesse aut quam nescit inesse
<pb ed="#Qc" n="454"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vel non inesse. Si quam cognoscit inesse vel non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>inesse, facta detractione<!--a--> non amittit hanc cogni<lb ed="#Qc"/>tionem;
ergo quantum ad hoc per detractionem
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non excaecatur. Si vero quam nescit, ergo non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>fuit in eo cognitio bonitatis vel malitiae in altero;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ergo per detractionem non amittit: non enim
<lb ed="#Qc"/>potest per detractionem amitti<!--b--> nisi quod habe<lb ed="#Qc"/>batur.
Nec videtur per detractionem privari a<!--c-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cognitione alterius veritatis, cum alia veritas sit
<lb ed="#Qc"/>impertinens; ergo videtur quod detractio non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>excaecet.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-d1e167">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: 1. Ad quod dicendum<!--d--> quod est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>duplex lumen: lumen cognitionis speculativae et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>lumen cognitionis practicae, qua<!--e--> homo vult
<lb ed="#Qc"/>bonum alteri et placet sibi bonum in altero et dis<lb ed="#Qc"/>plicet
malum. Per detractionem ergo non opor<lb ed="#Qc"/>tet
quod privetur lumen cognitionis speculativae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>in ipso detrahente, sed privatur lumen cognitionis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>practicae. Non enim minus cognoscitur veritas
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cognitione speculativa, sed magis displicet veritas
<lb ed="#Qc"/>bonitatis et magis placet veritas malitiae. Unde
<lb ed="#Qc"/>oculus rationis practicae excaecatur, cui sapit
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quod non est sapiendum et non sapit quod est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sapiendum; idem enim in re est visus quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>gustus, licet differens ratione. Iste est oculus ne<lb ed="#Qc"/>quam,
de quo dicitur <name>Matth.</name> 6, 23: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-Qd1e201" source="http://scta.info/resource/mt6_23">Si oculus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>tuus fuerit nequam, totum corpus taum<!--f--> tene<lb ed="#Qc"/>brosam
erit</quote>. Iste est etiam<!--g--> gustus hominis aegri,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cui amarum videtur dulce et dulce amarum. Unde
<lb ed="#Qc"/><title>Isai.</title> 5, 20 dicitur talibus: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-Qd1e213" source="http://scta.info/resource/is5_20">Vae illis, qui ponunt
<lb ed="#Qc"/>tenebras lucem et lucem tenebras et amarum in<!--h-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dulce et dulce in amarum!</quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-d1e221">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>II. Item, ponitur effectus huius peccati lepra
<lb ed="#Qc"/>spiritualis, cuius<!--i--> indicium erat lepra Mariae,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sororis Moysi, sicut habetur <title>Num.</title> 12, 10. Dicitur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>enim ibi<!--1-->: <quote>Ecce Maria apparuit candens lepra
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quasi nix</quote>. De hoc effectu<!--k--> habetur in <title>Glossa</title><!--2-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>super illud <title>Num.</title> 12, 1: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-Qd1e236">Lepra consequitur de<lb ed="#Qc"/>trahentes<!--l--></quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-d1e242">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Sed videtur potius quod debeat<!--m--> esse effectus
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccati carnalis. 1. Lepra enim est universalis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>corruptio in carne; lepra ergo spiritualis<!--n--> univer<lb ed="#Qc"/>salis
est corruptio carnalis concupiscentiae; illa
<lb ed="#Qc"/>autem fit in peccato carnali; ergo effectus conse<lb ed="#Qc"/>quens
peccatum carnale est proprie lepra.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-d1e258">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Praeterea, dictum est <name>Iezi</name><!--3-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-Qd1e262">Lepra adhaerebit
<lb ed="#Qc"/>tibi et semini tuo</quote>. Hoc autem fuit propter peccatum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cupiditatis; ergo corruptio spiritualis, quae dicitur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>lepra, proprie consequitur<!--o--> peccatum cupiditatis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t3s2q9c8-d1e272">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod dicendum quod in lepra
<lb ed="#Qc"/>plures attenduntur proprietates: una est univer<lb ed="#Qc"/>salis
corruptio; alia est quod est morbus conta<lb ed="#Qc"/>giosus;
tertia est quod magis et magis invale<lb ed="#Qc"/>scit,
secundum quod homo est maioris aetatis.
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Et propter hoc potest designari effectus peccati
<lb ed="#Qc"/>differentis, secundum has differentes<!--p--> proprietates,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ut detractioni conveniat propter morbi contagio<lb ed="#Qc"/>nem:
detractor enim de facili inficit auditorem;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccato vero carnis conveniat propter concupi<lb ed="#Qc"/>scentiae
corruptionem universalem sive peccati
<lb ed="#Qc"/>foetorem; peccato vero<!--q--> cupiditatis propter aug<lb ed="#Qc"/>mentum:
quanto enim magis homo tendit ad
<lb ed="#Qc"/>senectutem, tanto ex natura corrupta magis do<lb ed="#Qc"/>minatur
cupiditas in illo.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>