-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3.xml
159 lines (159 loc) · 8.91 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 4, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 3, C. 3</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 4, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 3, C. 3</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 4, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 3, C. 3</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-Hd1e103" type="question-title">UTRUM IRA SIT ALIQUA PASSIONUM QUAS PONIT <name>AUGUSTINUS</name> ET <name>TULLIUS</name>.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-d1e106">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Tertio quaeritur utrum sit aliqua quatuor pas<lb ed="#Qc"/>sionum
vel perturbationum, quas ponit <name>Au<lb ed="#Qc"/>gustinus</name>
et <name>Tullius</name><!--5-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-d1e117">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Et ostenditur quod sic, a. quoniam, secundum
<lb ed="#Qc"/><name>Philosophum</name><!--6-->, nihil est in genere quod non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sit in aliqua eius specie; si ergo ira est passio,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sicut dicit <name>Damascenus</name><!--7-->, constat quod ad
<lb ed="#Qc"/>aliquam quatuor passionum, quas ponit <name>Augu<lb ed="#Qc"/>stinus</name>,
in XIV <title>De civitate Dei</title><!--8-->, reducitur.
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Dicit enim quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-Qd1e134">omnis humanorum morum
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vitiositas istis<!--t--> quatuor continetur perturbationi<lb ed="#Qc"/>bus</quote>,
scilicet gaudio, dolore, metu et spe. Sub
<lb ed="#Qc"/>qua ergo est ira?
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-d1e144">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Ostenditur quod 1. non sit sub gaudio nec
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sub dolore, quia gaudium et dolor sunt in concu<lb ed="#Qc"/>piscibili<!--u-->;
sed ira est passio irascibilis sive quae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est in irascibili; ergo non continetur sub gaudio
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vel sub dolore. — Praeterea, non videtur conti<lb ed="#Qc"/>neri
sub metu vel spe<!--v-->, quoniam ira dicitur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>respectu iniuriae iam factae vel aestimatae; sed
<lb ed="#Qc"/>metus et spes respiciunt malum vel bonum<!--x-->
<pb ed="#Qc" n="542"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>futurum vel quod aestimatur futurum; ira ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est respectu praesentis vel praeteriti, metus au<lb ed="#Qc"/>tem
et spes respectu futuri boni vel<!--a--> mali; ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non reducitur ad aliquam illarum; ergo aut non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est passio aut praeter illas passiones sunt aliae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>passiones.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-d1e182">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Quod autem contineatur sub passione, quae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est tristitia vel dolor, patet, quoniam <name>Au<lb ed="#Qc"/>gustinus</name><!--1-->
definit iram per tristitiam, dicens
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-Qd1e192">ira est tristitia ex impotentia ulciscendi
<lb ed="#Qc"/>se</quote>. — Contra. Ira est passio ipsius irascibilis;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sed tristitia est in concupiscibili; ergo ira non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>reducitur ad passionem tristitiae vel doloris.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-d1e203">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>3. Item<!--b-->, iuxta hoc quaeritur. Dicit <name>Damasce<lb ed="#Qc"/>nus</name><!--2-->
quod haec passio est mixta ext ira et con<lb ed="#Qc"/>cupiscentia,
et loquitur ibi de ira; si sic, ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ira est mixta ex ira et alio; sed quaeritur quid
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est hoc dictu, cum nihil tale ex se et alio mi<lb ed="#Qc"/>sceatur.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-d1e219">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod dicendum quod<!--d--> in pertur<lb ed="#Qc"/>batione
irae, secundum quod tangit <name>Damasce<lb ed="#Qc"/>nus</name><!--3-->,
est concupiscentia alicuius rei, cuius rei<!--e-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>si fiat prohibitio, est motus contra prohiben<lb ed="#Qc"/>tem.
Unde dicit<!--4--> quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-Qd1e232">ira est audax<!--f--> mentis,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vindex concupiscentiae</quote>, et hoc modo concupi<lb ed="#Qc"/>scentia
praecedit, quae sub una specie quatuor
<lb ed="#Qc"/>perturbationum continetur; ipsa vero ira est mo<lb ed="#Qc"/>tus
quidam, non in<!--g--> anima prout est passiva,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sed prout est activa: insurgit enim ad vindictam
<lb ed="#Qc"/>propter iniuriae passionem praecedentem. — Alio
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vero modo, prout<!--h--> ira dicitur tristitia, ex eo quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>nolenti accidit, sub tristitia continebitur<!--i--> sive sub
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dolore, prout dicit <name>Augustinus</name><!--5-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-Qd1e256">Cum dis<lb ed="#Qc"/>sentimus<!--k-->
ab eo quod nolentibus accidit, talis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>voluntas tristitia est </quote>. — Tertio vero modo, prout
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicitur appetitus poenae, cadit sub concupiscentia
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sive cupiditate generali. Dicit enim <name>Augusti<lb ed="#Qc"/>nus</name>,
in libro <title>De civitate Dei</title><!--6-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-Qd1e270">Cum consen<lb ed="#Qc"/>timus
appetendo ea quae volumus<!--l-->, cupiditas di<lb ed="#Qc"/>citur</quote>,
et hoc modo dicetur ira cupiditas vin<lb ed="#Qc"/>dictae
et cadet<!--m--> sub concupiscentia, quae est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>appetitivae generalis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-d1e282">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Per hoc potest patere qua<lb ed="#Qc"/>liter
respondendum est ad primo obiectum.
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Ira enim uno modo est actus irascibilis et non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>continetur sub tristitia, quae est in concupiscibili;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>alio vero modo vel est<!--n--> tristitia vel habet an<lb ed="#Qc"/>nexam
tristitiam; tertio vero modo sub cupiditate
<lb ed="#Qc"/>generali continetur.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-d1e300">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Ad id ergo quod secundo obicitur quod
<lb ed="#Qb"/><mentioned>ira<!--o--> est tristitia</mentioned>: dicendum quod est definitio
<lb ed="#Qc"/>data per causam. Qui enim irascitur, tristatur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>primo ex hoc quod non potest se ulcisci.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t4s2q1t3c3-d1e309">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>3. Ad tertium vero dicendum quod, licet
<lb ed="#Qc"/>illa passio mixta sit ex ira et concupiscentia,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non tamen ira miscetur ex se et alio. Est enim
<lb ed="#Qc"/>passionem irae accipere pro toto motu, qui est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ex concupiscentia praecedente, et ira proprie
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicta subsequente, et hoc modo illa passio di<lb ed="#Qc"/>icitur<!--p-->
esse mixta ex concupiscentia et ira.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>