-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2.xml
130 lines (130 loc) · 6.8 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 5, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 7, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 5, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 7, C. 2</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 5, S. 2, Q. 1, T. 7, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-Hd1e103" type="question-title">DE COMPARATIONE- HUIUS PECCATI AD PECCATUM INCESTUS.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-d1e106">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Secundo quaeritur de comparatione huius pec<lb ed="#Qc"/>cati
incestus ad illud peccatum incestus quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicitur esse ratione consanguinitatis vel affini<lb ed="#Qc"/>tatis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-d1e117">
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Et videtur quod maius sit peccatum. 1. Maior
<lb ed="#Qc"/>enim est affinitas spiritualis quam carnalis, sicut
<lb ed="#Qc"/>praevalet spiritus carni; ergo maius videtur esse
<lb ed="#Qc"/>hoc peccatum illo.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-d1e130">
<pb ed="#Qc" n="650"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Praeterea, hic est quaedam sacrae rei vio<lb ed="#Qc"/>latio,
ibi vero non; ergo hoc peccatum videtur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>esse maius illo.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-d1e144">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Contra. a. Vinculum consanguinitatis est vincu<lb ed="#Qc"/>lum
naturae; vinculum<!--a--> autem naturae est vin<lb ed="#Qc"/>culum
primum<!--b1-->; ergo peccatum carnis, quod est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>contra illud, maius est quam peccatum quod est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>contra vinculum spirituale.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-d1e157">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>b. Item, ponitur similitudo patris spiritualis ad
<lb ed="#Qc"/>carnalem et non e converso, cum dicitur<!--2-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-Qd1e163">Ita di<lb ed="#Qc"/>ligere
debet homo eum qui se suscepit<!--c--> de sacro
<lb ed="#Qc"/>fonte sicut d patrem</quote>. Et<!--e--> similiter arguitur quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non potest fieri coniugium inter personas quae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>habent spiritualem<!--f--> proximitatem, sicut non potest
<lb ed="#Qc"/>esse coniugium inter personas quae habent con<lb ed="#Qc"/>sanguinitatem.
Unde dicitur XXX<!--g-->, quaest. 3, in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>principio<!--3-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-Qd1e181">Non<!--h--> arbitror posse fieri legale con<lb ed="#Qc"/>iugium,
quando quidem nec inter eos qui na<lb ed="#Qc"/>tura
et eos qui adoptione filii sunt venerandae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>leges matrimonia contrahi permittunt</quote>. Addu<lb ed="#Qc"/>citur
ergo similitudo a vinculo naturali usque
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ad vinculum spirituale; per quod videtur quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>fortius sit vinculum consanguinitatis quam<!--i--> spi<lb ed="#Qc"/>ritualis
proximitatis, et ita maior<!--k--> transgressio
<lb ed="#Qc"/>contra illud quam contra aliud.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t5s2q1t7c2-d1e202">
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: Ad quod videtur dicendum<!--l--> quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dignior est proximitas spiritualis proximitate car<lb ed="#Qc"/>nali,
quae est per affinitatem, et ita, licet<!--m--> ratione
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dignitatis maius videatur<!--n--> esse peccatum contra
<lb ed="#Qc"/>illam quam [contra] illam, quia tamen<!--o--> proximitas
<lb ed="#Qc"/>naturalis prior est et universalior, quoad hoc vi<lb ed="#Qc"/>detur
maior iniuria ex ista parte quam ex illa, et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ita videntur excedentia esse et excessa. Praeterea,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ratione diversarum personarum in linea consan<lb ed="#Qc"/>guinitatis
et proximitatis spiritualis. Quae enim
<lb ed="#Qc"/>remotior est in linea spiritualis proximitatis mi<lb ed="#Qc"/>nus
peccat<!--p--> quam illa quae propinquior est in
<lb ed="#Qc"/>linea consanguinitatis, et similiter quae remotior
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est in linea consanguinitatis minus peccat quam<!--q-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quae propinquior est in linea cognationis spiri<lb ed="#Qc"/>tualis.
Si vero fiat collatio inter spiritualem co<lb ed="#Qc"/>gnationem
et affinitatem, maius peccatum videtur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>esse cum fit peccatum carnis contra spiritua<lb ed="#Qc"/>lem
cognationem quam contra affinitatem, licet
<lb ed="#Qc"/>affinitas prior esset quam spiritualis proximitas;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>affinitas enim erat in Lege Veteri, spiritualis vero
<lb ed="#Qc"/>proximitas ex Lege Nova videtur initium sumere
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ratione catechismi, Baptismi et Contirmationis,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>principaliter vero ratione Baptismi. Et ita patere
<lb ed="#Qc"/>potest solutio.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>