-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6.xml
254 lines (254 loc) · 15.4 KB
/
ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 6, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 6</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 6, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 6</title>
<date when="2017-08-19">August 19, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qc" n="quaracchi1930">Quaracchi 1930</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-08-19" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Hd1e100">IIa-IIae, Inq. 3, Tract. 6, Q. 2, T. 2, C. 6</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Hd1e103" type="question-title">UTRUM AMOR INDEBITUS SIT ODIUM.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e106">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Sexto quaeritur I. utrum amor indebitus sit
<lb ed="#Qc"/>odium.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Et videtur quod non. 1. Amor enim et odium
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sunt affectiones oppositae: amor enim est copula
<lb ed="#Qc"/>amantis cum amato<!--3-->, odium vero est<!--f--> disiunctio
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ab eo quod videtur inconveniens; cum ergo non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sit idem conveniens<!--g--> et non conveniens<!--h-->, non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>erit amor indebitus idem quod odium.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e129">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Praeterea, contingit unum esse sine altero:
<lb ed="#Qc"/>potest enim<!--i--> aliquis amare indebite aliquod bo<lb ed="#Qc"/>num
mutabile et non habere odium sui; ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non est idem amor indebitus quod odium sui.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e141">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>3. Praeterea, sicut dicit <name>Apostolus</name> ad <title>Ephes.</title>
<lb ed="#Qb"/>5, 29: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e147" source="http://scta.info/resource/eph5_29">Nemo unquam carnem suam odio habuit</quote>,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>multo fortius se ipsum; si<!--k--> ergo nullus se ipsum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>odio habet, non erit idem amor indebitas alicuius
<lb ed="#Qc"/>apparentis boni quod odium sui.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e158">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Contra. a. Dicitur in <title>Psalmo</title><!--4-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e162">Qui diligit ini<lb ed="#Qc"/>quitatem,
odit animam suam</quote><!--l-->. Ergo amor pec<lb ed="#Qc"/>cati
est<!--m--> odium sui. Exponitur autem ibi<!--5--> quid
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est diligere iniquitatem: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e171">Ille diligit iniquitatem,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>qui ex<!--n--> desiderio et affectu peccat, qui, si semper
<lb ed="#Qc"/>viveret, semper peccare vellet</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e179">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>b. Item, super illud <title>Ioan.</title> 12, 25: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e183">Qui amat ani<lb ed="#Qc"/>mam
suam</quote><!--o-->, <name>Augustinus</name><!--6-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e188">Amor animae est
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>perditio eius</quote>. Sed perditio illius<!--p--> est odium illius;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ergo amor animae illius est odium; sed hoc<!--q--> est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>amor indebitus; ergo amor indebitus est odium<!--r-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e200">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Item, probari potest per oppositum. Odium
<lb ed="#Qc"/>debitum est amor, secundum quod dicit <name>Augusti<lb ed="#Qc"/>nus</name><!--7-->:
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e208">Si bene oderis, tunc amasti</quote>. Ergo per
<lb ed="#Qc"/>oppositum amor indebitus est odium. Similiter
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicit <name>Hieronymus</name><!--8-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e216">Odium in suos est pietas
<lb ed="#Qc"/>in Deum</quote>. Sed<!--s--> pietas in Deum<!--t--> est amor de<lb ed="#Qc"/>bitus;
ergo odium in suos est amor debitus; per
<lb ed="#Qc"/>oppositum ergo amor indebitus est odium.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e226">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>d. Item, <name>Augustinus</name>, in libro <title>De sermone
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Domini in monte</title><!--9-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e232">Odium conditionis vitae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>praesentis est amor regni</quote>. Sed amor regni<!--v--> est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>amor debitus; ergo odium conditionis vitae prae<lb ed="#Qc"/>sentis
est amor debitus; ergo per oppositum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>amor<!--x--> indebitus est odium.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e245">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>II. Huius gratia quaeritur utrum aliquis possit
<lb ed="#Qc"/>se odire et non amare.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e253">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Quod videtur. a. <title>Luc.</title> 14, 26 dicitur: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e257" source="http://scta.info/resource/lc14_26">Si quis non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>odit animam suam, non potest meus esse disci<lb ed="#Qc"/>pulus</quote>.
Sed odire animam suam est odire se; ergo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>potest aliquis se ipsum odire.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e267">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>b. Similiter <name>Augustinus</name>, <title>De vera innocen<lb ed="#Qc"/>tia</title><!--10-->:
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e273">Quicumque se ipsum, non Deum, amat,
<pb ed="#Qc" n="703"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non se amat, quia<!--a--> quicumque non potest de se
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vivere, moritur amando se</quote>. Ergo potest aliquis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non amare se et per consequens odire.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e287">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Contra. 1. Natura<!--b-->, ratio et gratia dictant sui di<lb ed="#Qc"/>lectionem,
ipsa etiam libido; sed non sunt<!--c--> plura
<lb ed="#Qc"/>moventia; ergo nullus potest se odio habere.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e296">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Solutio]: I. Ad quod dicendum<!--d--> est quod amor
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sui dicitur multipliciter: vel prout sonat in na<lb ed="#Qc"/>turam
vel prout datur intelligi amor imaginis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>divinae sive similitudinis vel prout dicitur amor
<lb ed="#Qc"/>corruptionis vitiosae; iis enim tribus modis acci<lb ed="#Qc"/>pitur
in Scriptura. Amor enim naturae est de<!--e-->
<lb ed="#Qc"/>quo dicit <name>Augustinus</name><!--1--> quod non oportuit prae<lb ed="#Qc"/>cipi
quod homo se ipsum diligeret: hoc<!--f--> enim a
<lb ed="#Qc"/>natura inest. Et dicit <name>Bernardus</name><!--2--> quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e317"><quote>prius
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est<!--g--> quod animale est<!--h-->, quam quod spirituale
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est</quote><!--3-->; propter quod in primis<!--i--> diligit homo se
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ipsum: caro quippe est<!--4--> et nihil valet sapere
<lb ed="#Qc"/>praeter se</quote>. — Est autem alius amor, quo homo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>diligit imaginem Dei in se, et hoc modo acci<lb ed="#Qc"/>pitur
in libro <title>De vera religione</title><!--5-->, cum dicitur:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e333">In eo nihil praeter hominem diligat</quote>, id est
<lb ed="#Qc"/>creaturam Dei ad eius imaginem tactam. Et alibi<!--6-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e338"><quote>Qui diligit proximum tamquam se ipsum</quote><!--7-->, non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>illi invidet ut sit quod ipse est; apud enim se
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ipsum habet quem diligit tamquam se ipsum</quote>.
<lb ed="#Qb"/>— Tertius vero amor est corruptionis vitiosae, et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>secundum hunc modum dicitur <title>Ioan.</title> 12, 25: <quote>Qui
<lb ed="#Qc"/>amat animam suam, perdet eam</quote>. Et sicut multi<lb ed="#Qc"/>plex
est amor, ita multiplex est odium, quod
<lb ed="#Qc"/>amori opponitur. — Cum ergo primo quaeritur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>utrum amor indebitus sit odium, respondendum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est quod haec praedicatio non est per essentiam,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sed<!--k--> per concomitantiam, et intelligitur de amore
<lb ed="#Qc"/>peccati ad quem<!--l--> per reputationem sequitur
<lb ed="#Qc"/>odium imaginis divinae, cum per peccatum de<lb ed="#Qc"/>formetur
vel maculetur; odium etiam<!--m--> est per
<lb ed="#Qc"/>consequens boni naturalis<!--n-->, quod corrumpitur et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>diminuitur<!--o-->, sed non propter hoc illius boni
<lb ed="#Qc"/>naturalis quod per peccatum corrumpi non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>potest<!--8-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e376">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Primo ergo obiectum ad
<lb ed="#Qc"/>hoc tendit ut hoc non sit illud per essentiam,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sed non negatur quin per concomitantiam.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e385">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>2. Secundum autem<!--p--> obiectum ad hoc tendit
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ut amor peccati possit esse sine odio naturae:
<cb ed="#Qc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dico autem de natura, quae<!--q--> per peccatum non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>diminuitur.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e399">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>3. Ad idem tendit quod tertio obiectum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e404">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>a. Ad id autem quod<!--r--> obicitur ex alia parte,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicendum est quod loquitur ibi de odio imaginis
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sive similitudinis divinae, quod per consequens
<lb ed="#Qc"/>consequitur ex amore illicito.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e415">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>b. Cum autem dicitur <title>Ioan.</title> 12, 25: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e419" source="http://scta.info/resource/io12_25">Qui amat
<lb ed="#Qc"/>animam suam</quote> etc., amor animae accipitur ibi pro
<lb ed="#Qc"/>amore carnalis desiderii et animalis, qui in per<lb ed="#Qc"/>ditionem
et odium tendit reformationis divinae.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e429">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>c. Ad illud vero quod obicitur quod <mentioned>odium
<lb ed="#Qc"/>debitum sit amor</mentioned>, intelligitur de odio peccati et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>sequelae eius, quod interpretative est amor ima<lb ed="#Qc"/>ginis
divinae vel ipsius boni naturalis. — Et ad
<lb ed="#Qc"/>ea quae sequuntur, similiter dicendum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e442">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>d. Ad id vero quod dicit <name>Augustinus</name> quod
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e446">odium conditionis vitae praesentis est amor
<lb ed="#Qc"/>regni</quote>, intelligendum est quod duplex est con<lb ed="#Qc"/>ditio
vitae praesentis: una, quae avertit a Deo
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vel dat occasionem avertendi<!--s--> se ab ipso, et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>hoc modo odium istius<!--t--> conditionis est amor
<lb ed="#Qc"/>regni per consequens; alio vero modo conditio
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vitae praesentis dicitur vel ipsa conditio naturae
<lb ed="#Qc"/>vel ipsius poenalitatis promoventis ad bonum, et
<lb ed="#Qc"/>hoc modo odium conditionis in praesenti non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>dicitur amor regni. Et per simile dicit <name>Hiero<lb ed="#Qc"/>nymus</name>,
<title>Ad Furiam</title><!--9-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e471"><quote>Honora patrem tuum</quote><!--10-->,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>si te a vero Patre non separat</quote>; si autem te se<lb ed="#Qc"/>parare
intendit, odio habendus est. Et ideo di<lb ed="#Qc"/>citur
<title>Luc.</title> 14, 26: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e480" source="http://scta.info/resource/lc14_26">Si quis venit ad me, et non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>odit patrem suum et matrem</quote> etc. Et similiter dicit
<lb ed="#Qc"/><name>Chrysostomus</name><!--11-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e487">Non simpliciter iubet<!--u-->odio
<lb ed="#Qc"/>habere</quote>, sed <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e493">quod in itinere Dei nobis obsi<lb ed="#Qc"/>stit<!--12-->,
hoc odio habere<!--v--></quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-d1e499">
<lb ed="#Qc"/>II. Ad illud vero quod quaeritur <mentioned>utrum ali<lb ed="#Qc"/>quis
se ipsum odio habere possit</mentioned>: respondendum
<lb ed="#Qc"/>est per distinctionem supra dictam<!--13--> quod, si intel<lb ed="#Qc"/>ligatur
de odio naturae, quae non potest minui
<lb ed="#Qc"/>per peccatum, quae substernitur omni amori, se<lb ed="#Qc"/>cundum
hoc non potest odio haberi; si vero
<lb ed="#Qc"/>intelligatur de amore eius quod declinat in vi<lb ed="#Qc"/>tium
vel eius quod inclinat ad gratiam per se,
<lb ed="#Qc"/>secundum hoc potest odio haberi per conse<lb ed="#Qc"/>quens.
Dilectio enim gratuita tollit amorem vitio<lb ed="#Qc"/>sum
sibi oppositum et e converso. Et ideo dicit
<pb ed="#Qc" n="704"/>
<cb ed="#Qc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/><name>Augustinus</name><!--1-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l2Bi3t6q2t2c6-Qd1e531">Quicumque se ipsum, non
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Deum, amat, non se amat; quicumque autem
<lb ed="#Qc"/>Deum amat, non se, ipse se amat<!--a-->, quia quicumque
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qc"/>non potest de se vivere, moritur amando se;
<lb ed="#Qc"/>cum vero diligitur de quo vivitur, non se dili<lb ed="#Qc"/>gendo
magis diligit</quote>.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>