-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2.xml
172 lines (172 loc) · 10.4 KB
/
ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>III, P. 2, Inq. 2, Q. 1, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>III, P. 2, Inq. 2, Q. 1, C. 2</title>
<date when="2017-10-16">October 16, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qd" n="quaracchi1948d">Quaracchi 1948, Volume 4</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-10-16" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-Hd1e102">III, P. 2, Inq. 2, Q. 1, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-Hd1e105" type="question-title">UTRUM LEX NATURALIS SIT CREATA VEL INCREATA.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-d1e108">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Secundo quaeritur utrum lex naturalis<!--m--> sit
<lb ed="#Qd"/>creata vel increata<!--n-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-d1e115">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad quod sic: 1. Lex naturalis est secundum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quam animae rationales de istis inferioribus recte
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>iudicant; sed lex aeterna est huiusmodi; ergo lex
<lb ed="#Qd"/>naturalis est lex aeterna; ergo increata. — Minor
<lb ed="#Qd"/>patet per <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinum</name>, in libro <title>De vero re<lb ed="#Qd"/>ligione</title><!--4-->:
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-Qd1e135">Lex aeterna est prima veritas et lex
<lb ed="#Qd"/>omnium artium et<!--o--> lex omnipotentis Artificis. Ut
<pb ed="#Qd" n="341"/>
<cb ed="#Qd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>enim nos et omnes rationales animae secundum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>veritatem de interioribus recte iudicamus<!--a-->, sic de
<lb ed="#Qd"/>nobis, quando eidem inhaeremus<!--b-->, sola veritas
<lb ed="#Qd"/>iudicat</quote>. Et<!--c--> hanc veritatem appellat legem ae<lb ed="#Qd"/>ternam,
et sic per eam recte iudicamus de infe<lb ed="#Qd"/>rioribus.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-d1e158">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>2. Secunda ratio. <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name>, in libro <title>De
<lb ed="#Qd"/>vera religione</title><!--1-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-Qd1e167">Menti nostrae concessum est
<lb ed="#Qd"/>videre legem talem</quote>. Sed hoc non visione cor<lb ed="#Qd"/>porali,
istud planum est; similiter nec imaginaria;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ergo visione intellectuali. Sed dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name><!--2-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quod<!--d--> visione intellectuali videntur res quae vi<lb ed="#Qd"/>dentur
re, non similitudine, sive quae non vi<lb ed="#Qd"/>dentur
imagine<!--e-->, sed re ipsa; ergo non est si<lb ed="#Qd"/>militudo
aliqua vel imago legis aeternae in anima,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>immo ipsa lex aeterna est in<!--f--> anima. Sed lex
<lb ed="#Qd"/>naturalis creata<!--g--> imago est illius; ergo ipsa non
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est in anima<!--h-->; ergo si est aliqua lex in anima,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>haec est solum lex naturalis increata.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-d1e199">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad oppositum: a. Lex naturalis obscuratur
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et obtenebratur per peccatum, sicut habetur in
<lb ed="#Qd"/><title>Glossa</title><!--3--> <title>Rom.</title> 2; sed lex increata non; ergo
<lb ed="#Qd"/>lex naturalis non<!--i--> est increata.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-d1e210">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>b. Secunda ratio. <title>Eccli.</title> 17, 9: <quote>Addidit ei di<lb ed="#Qd"/>sciplinam,
et legem vitae hereditavit illos</quote>, <title>Glos<lb ed="#Qd"/>sa</title><!--k4-->:
<quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-Qd1e218">Vel legem litterae<!--l--> ad correctionem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>legis naturalis scribi voluit</quote>. Lex ergo naturalis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est corrigibilis; sed lex<!--m--> increata non, quoniam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>in<!--n--> lege aeterna sive increata non cadit mutabi<lb ed="#Qd"/>litas;
ergo lex naturalis non est increata, sed
<lb ed="#Qd"/>creata.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-d1e233">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Solutio: Dicendum quod lex naturalis uno
<lb ed="#Qd"/>modo dicitur regula exemplaris prima, et sic
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ipsa est prima Veritas, et sic lex naturalis idem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est quod lex aeterna et increata. Alio modo di<lb ed="#Qd"/>citur
lex naturalis<!--o--> regula quae est exemplum,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>indita animae ad cognoscendum quid faciendum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et quid non, et hoc modo creata est<!--p--> et con<lb ed="#Qd"/>creata
animae, et de hac procedit quaestio; et
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sic patet quod ipsa est creata<!--q-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-d1e255">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1. Ad primam rationem in con<lb ed="#Qd"/>trarium
dicendum quod, cum dicitur <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-Qd1e261">secundum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>legem aeternam recte iudicamus de istis inferio<lb ed="#Qd"/>ribus</quote>,
hic notatur causa formalis exemplaris<!--r-->.
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Cum autem dicitur <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-Qd1e273">secundum legem naturalem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>iudicamus de interioribus</quote>, hic notatur causa
<lb ed="#Qd"/>formalis exemplata, et ita differenter dicitur illud
<lb ed="#Qd"/>de ipsis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in2q1c2-d1e283">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>2. Ad secundam dicendum quod, cum di<lb ed="#Qd"/>citur
quod <mentioned>illud quod videtur<!--a--> visione intellec<lb ed="#Qd"/>tuali,
videtur re ipsa et non similitudine</mentioned>, hoc
<lb ed="#Qd"/>verum est de visione intellectuali, quae est ter<lb ed="#Qd"/>tium
caelum. Nam triplex est visio<!--5-->: primo, una<!--b-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>corporalis, quae fit per sensum; alia autem ima<lb ed="#Qd"/>ginaria<!--c-->,
quae fit in somnis; tertia intellectualis.
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Et haec est<!--d--> triplex secundum tres caelos. Nam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est visio intellectualis quae fit per similitudinem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>abstractam a sensu, et haec visio intellectualis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>corporalis dicitur suo<!--e--> modo. Alia est visio in<lb ed="#Qd"/>tellectualis
quae dicitur imaginaria, quae scili<lb ed="#Qd"/>cet<!--f-->
fit per similitudinem abstractam ab imagi<lb ed="#Qd"/>natione<!--g-->.
Tertia est qua cognoscit anima rem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non per similitudinem abstractam a sensu vel
<lb ed="#Qd"/>imaginatione<!--h-->, sed qua cognoscit rem ut est, et
<lb ed="#Qd"/>haec est tertium caelum. Et de hac dicitur <title>Paulus</title>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>esse raptus usque ad tertium caelum<!--6-->, et haec
<lb ed="#Qd"/>fuit visio per revelationem. De hac autem visione
<lb ed="#Qd"/>vera est illa auctoritas <name ref="#Augustine">Augustini</name>, non de aliis;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>nisi distinguatur similitudo duplex, scilicet cor<lb ed="#Qd"/>poralis
et spiritualis. Quae ergo videntur visione
<lb ed="#Qd"/>hac<!--I-->, non videntur similitudine corporali, sed
<lb ed="#Qd"/>spirituali videntur<!--k--> quaedam hac visione. Nam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quaedam<!--l--> videt anima hac visione, quae non
<lb ed="#Qd"/>videt nec similitudine corporali nec spirituali,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sicut quando videt se et suas affectiones et
<lb ed="#Qd"/>actiones et suam iustitiam. Quaedam autem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>videt hac visione per similitudinem spiritua<lb ed="#Qd"/>lem,
sicut angelum et sicut cognoscit iustitiam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>alterius. Et propter hoc ista propositio inde<lb ed="#Qd"/>finite
dicitur<!--m--> quod <mentioned>quae videntur visione in<lb ed="#Qd"/>tellectuali<!--n-->,
videntur re et non similitudine</mentioned>, ut<!--o-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>intelligatur de illis quae videt anima per se et
<lb ed="#Qd"/>per praesentiam sive per revelationem. Verum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est tamen simpliciter quod non videntur simi<lb ed="#Qd"/>litudine
corporali aliqua hac visione<!--p-->, sed ta<lb ed="#Qd"/>men
quaedam sic similitudine spirituali, et sic
<lb ed="#Qd"/>lex<!--q--> aeterna in anima videtur per visionem in<lb ed="#Qd"/>tellectualem.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>