-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2.xml
308 lines (308 loc) · 19 KB
/
ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>III, P. 2, Inq. 3, T. 2, S. 1, Q. 1, T. 1, D. 3, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>III, P. 2, Inq. 3, T. 2, S. 1, Q. 1, T. 1, D. 3, C. 2</title>
<date when="2017-10-16">October 16, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qd" n="quaracchi1948d">Quaracchi 1948, Volume 4</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-10-16" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e102">III, P. 2, Inq. 3, T. 2, S. 1, Q. 1, T. 1, D. 3, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e105" type="question-title">DE ADORATIONE HOMINIS.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e108">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Postquam habitum est de adoratione angeli,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quaeritur de adoratione hominis, quia di<lb ed="#Qd"/>cit<!--a-->
<name>Apostolus</name>: <quote>Honore invicem praevenientes</quote>,
<lb ed="#Qd"/><title>Rom.</title> 12, 10.
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Primo, utrum homo adorandus sit latria;
<cb ed="#Q" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>secundo, utrum omnes homines aequaliter sint
<lb ed="#Qd"/>adorandi;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>tertio, utrum mali sint adorandi;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quarto, quo modo sancti viri sint adorandi;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quinto, utrum malus praelatus plus sit ado<lb ed="#Qd"/>randus
quam bonus subditus.
</p>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Dd1e134" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e136">ARTICULUS I</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e139" type="question-title">Utrum hamo adorandus sit latria.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e142">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>I. Quantum ad primum obicitur sic<!--b-->: Dicit
<lb ed="#Qd"/><name>Ioannes Damascenus</name><!--1--> quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Qd1e148">honor, qui
<lb ed="#Qd"/>exhibetur imagini, refertur ad illum cuius est
<lb ed="#Qd"/>imago; unde dicit<!--c--> magnus <name>Basilius</name><!--2-->: Honor
<lb ed="#Qd"/>imaginis ad prototypon pervenit, id est ad exem<lb ed="#Qd"/>plar</quote>;
est enim prototypon<!--d--> prima forma sive
<lb ed="#Qd"/>forma exemplaris, ad quam facta est imago.
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Cum ergo homo sit expressissima imago Dei,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>poterit in homine adorari Deus latria, et ita per
<lb ed="#Qd"/>consequens homo potest adorari latria<!--e-->.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e169">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>II. Iuxta hoc quaeritur de B. Virgine<!--3-->. Nam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dicit <name>Ioannes Damascenus</name><!--4--> quod <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Qd1e175">honor,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>qui eius est, ad eum, qui de ea est incarnatus,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>refertur</quote>. Ergo ipsa potest adorari latria.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e183">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Solutio: I. Ad primum dicendum quod homo
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non potest adorari latria, tamen potest esse ma<lb ed="#Qd"/>teria
adorationis latriae, in quantum est imago
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ducens ad Deum, cuius est imago, et ideo ado<lb ed="#Qd"/>ratio
duliae debetur ei, secundum quod dicit
<lb ed="#Qd"/><name>Ioannes Damascenus</name>,in IV Libro<!--5-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Qd1e198">A prin<lb ed="#Qd"/>cipio
Deus hominem<!--f--> secundum propriam ima<lb ed="#Qd"/>ginem
fecit. Cuius igitur gratia nos ad invicem
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>adoramus, nisi quod secundum imaginem Dei
<lb ed="#Qd"/>facti sumus? Ut enim ait magnus in divinis <name>Ba<lb ed="#Qd"/>silius</name><!--ö-->,
honor imaginis ad prototypon pervenit,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>id est exemplar: prototypon autem est<!--g--> illud
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quod imago repraesentat</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e220">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>II. Ad secundum quod quaeritur de B. Vir<lb ed="#Qd"/>gine,
dicendum quod, quamvis <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Qd1e226">honor, qui eius
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est, ad eum qui ex ea est incarnatus</quote>, redu<lb ed="#Qd"/>catur,
non sequitur propter hoc quod honor ille
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sit latria, sed sequitur quod honor ille refertur
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad Christum. Honor tamen ille<!--h-->, qui B. Vir<lb ed="#Qd"/>gini
debetur, est cuiusdam praerogativae, sci<lb ed="#Qd"/>licet
duliae singularis et quasi immediate di<lb ed="#Qd"/>sponens
ad latriam, non tamen est latria. Cum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>enim adoro Matrem Dei in quantum huiusmodi,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non adoro ut causam mei conditricem, et ideo
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non adoro latria; quia autem adoro ut Matrem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Dei, honoro ut Matrem<!--i--> Creatoris, et hoc prop<lb ed="#Qd"/>ter
ipsum Creatorem. Unde ratio honoris est ipse
<lb ed="#Qd"/>honor Creatoris, ipse tamen honor exhibetur
<lb ed="#Qd"/>creaturae. Ex quo relinquitur quod honor ille
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est dulla praerogativae singularis disponens ad
<lb ed="#Qd"/>latriam, et cuius ratio latria est.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Dd1e266" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e268">Utrum omnes homines aequaliter sint adorandi.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e271">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Consequenter quaeritur utrum omnes homines
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sint aequaliter<!--k--> adorandi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e278">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad quod sio: 1. <name>Damascenus</name>, in IV libro<!--7-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Qd1e282">A principio Deus hominem secundum propriam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>imaginem fecit. Cuius igitur gratia nos ad invicem
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>adoramus, nisi quod secundum Dei imaginem facti
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sumus?</quote> Ex quo obicitur quod, si omnes ho<lb ed="#Qd"/>mines
aequaliter ad imaginem<!--l--> Dei facti sunt,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ergo omnes homines aequaliter adorandi sunt.
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Contra: a. Adoratio est debitum ratione di<lb ed="#Qd"/>gnitatis
excellentis; ergo, si est dignitas aliqua
<pb ed="#Qd" n="456"/>
<cb ed="#Qd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>excellens in uno respectu alterius, non aequaliter
<lb ed="#Qd"/>debetur eis<!--a--> adoratio. Vel si dicas quod immo,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quia non adorantur nisi ratione eius quod sunt
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad imaginem Dei, tunc sequetur ex hoc quod
<lb ed="#Qd"/>unus non debet alium adorare, quia unus aequalis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est<!--b--> alteri quantum ad imaginem.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e320">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>b. Item, praelatus ratione naturae non debet
<lb ed="#Qd"/>adorare subditum, quia aequalis est ei quantum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad naturam, similiter habet dignitatem excellentem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>respectu illius; ergo non debet ipsum adorare
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ratione dignitatis, immo potius e converso; ergo
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non aequaliter debetur omnibus adoratio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e336">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Solutio: Dicendum quod omnibus exhibendus
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est honor pro statu et tempore, quia omnes ad
<lb ed="#Qd"/>imaginem Dei facti sunt<!--e-->, ut dicit <name>Damasce<lb ed="#Qd"/>nus</name><!--1-->,
et haec est ratio communis quare honor
<lb ed="#Qd"/>omnibus<!--d--> debet exhiberi loco et tempore.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e350">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Sed notandum quod in imagine, quae est homo,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>intelligitur quod est per naturam; intelligitur
<lb ed="#Qd"/>etiam in ea quod est per gratiam, quae reducit
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ipsam imaginem in plenam conformitatem Dei,
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quia gratia<!--e--> ipsa est deiformitas. Ex parte igitur
<lb ed="#Qd"/>naturae non est differentia adorationis: unde
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quantum ad hoc est aequalitas in omnibus: sed
<lb ed="#Qd"/>respiciendo possibilitatem ad gratiam vel actum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>qui est<!--f--> per gratiam, quae actu est in imagine,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non est ita. Si enim in statu est<!--g--> gratiae et habet
<lb ed="#Qd"/>gratiam actu, habet bonum excellens in se, ra<lb ed="#Qd"/>tione
cuius debetur ei honor: quilibet enim talis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>in aliquo uno excellit, licet non habeat omnia
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dona, et ratione illius unius cantatur de quolibet
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Confessore<!--2-->: Non est inventus similis illi. Et sic
<lb ed="#Qd"/>respiciendo actum gratiae in habente, ratione
<lb ed="#Qd"/>cuius semper excellit, adorandus est homo et
<lb ed="#Qd"/>unus magis alio. Similiter respiciendo possibili<lb ed="#Qd"/>tatem
ad gratiam in homine, licet<!--h--> actu sit extra
<lb ed="#Qd"/>gratiam, tamen adhuc possibilis<!--i--> ad tantam gra<lb ed="#Qd"/>tiam
et ad maiorem quam aliquis alius habens
<lb ed="#Qd"/>gratiam actu; et respiciendo possibilitatem hanc
<lb ed="#Qd"/>in imagine in maiori excellentia<!--k-->, ita etiam re<lb ed="#Qd"/>spiciendo
hoc, maior honor<!--l--> potest impendi uni
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quam alii.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Dd1e411" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e413">ARTICULUS III.</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e416" type="question-title">Utrum mali homines sint adorandi.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e419">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Tertio quaeritur utrum malis hominibus de<lb ed="#Qd"/>beatur
adoratio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e426">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad quod sia: 1. <name>Ioannes Damascenus</name><!--3-->:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Qd1e430">Honorandum est<!--m--> sanctos ut filios et <quote>heredes
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Dei</quote>, ut dicit <name>Ioannes Evangelista</name><!--4--></quote>. Si ergo
<lb ed="#Qd"/>mali homines non sunt amici nec filii nec heredes
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Christi<!--n-->, ergo non sunt adorandi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e440">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad oppositum: a. <title>Rom.</title> 12, 10: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Qd1e444" source="http://scta.info/resource/rom12_10">Honore invicem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>praevenientes</quote>, <title>Glossa</title><!--5-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Qd1e449">Id est in qualibet re<lb ed="#Qd"/>verentia;
aliter non est fraternus amor, nisi mu<lb ed="#Qd"/>tuis
se praeveniant<!--o--> obsequiis</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e458">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>b. Item, aliquis modo<!--p--> malus forte praeordinatus
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>est ad maiorem iustitiam quam aliquis modo<!--q-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>bonus, et possibilis est ad hoc; ergo dignus est
<lb ed="#Qd"/>honore ratione istius possibilitatis.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e471">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Solutio: Dicendum, sicut supra dictum fuit<!--6-->,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quod<!--r--> mali homines, in quantum mali, non sunt
<lb ed="#Qd"/>diligendi, immo odio habendi, quia odire malum,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>in quantum malum, non est odire naturam eius,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sed odire vitium in ipso, ut dicit <name ref="#Augustine">Augustinus</name><!--7-->,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et ideo ,sic odiendi sunt, et sic non sunt hono<lb ed="#Qd"/>randi
nec adorandi. Attendendo tamen<!--s--> naturam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ipsam, quia sunt ad imaginem Dei facti et pos<lb ed="#Qd"/>sibiles
ad gratiam, ratione huius debetur eis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>honor<!--t--> et dilectio.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Dd1e499" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e501">ARTICULUS IV.</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e504" type="question-title">Quo modo sancti viri sint adorandi.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e507">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Quarto quaeritur de adoratione sanctorum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>qualis sit.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e514">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad quod sic: 1. Dulia adoramus sanctos; sed
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dulia idem est quod servitus, ut dicit <name>Augu<lb ed="#Qd"/>stinus</name><!--8-->;
ergo servitute ipsos adoramus.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e525">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad oppositum: u. <name>Augustinus</name>, in libro<!--u--> <title>De
<lb ed="#Qd"/>vera religione</title><!--9-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Qd1e531">Sancti adorandi<!--v--> sunt propter
<pb ed="#Qd" n="457"/>
<cb ed="#Qd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>imitationem, non propter religionem; adoramus
<lb ed="#Qd"/>eos caritate, non servitute</quote>. Ergo adoratio, qua
<lb ed="#Qd"/>adoramus eos<!--a-->, non est servitus.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e546">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Solutio: Dicendum quod duplex<!--b--> est servitus.
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Est enim servitus obnoxietatis, et haec debetur
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Deo, eo quod est principium nostri esse; est
<lb ed="#Qd"/>etiam servitus reverentiae, et haec debetur sanc<lb ed="#Qd"/>tis,
quia ipsi sunt nostri ductores<!--c--> vel per doctrinam,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sicut praelati, vel per intercessionem vel
<lb ed="#Qd"/>per administrationem.
</p>
</div>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Dd1e567" type="articulus">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e569">ARTICULUS V</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-Hd1e572" type="question-title">Utrum malus praelatus magis sit honorandus quam bonus subditus.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e575">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Quinto quaeritur an màlus praelatus magis sit
<lb ed="#Qd"/>honorandus<!--d--> quam bonus subditus vel e converso.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e582">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad quod sic: a. <title>Rom.</title> 13, 7: <quote>Cui honorem, hono<lb ed="#Qd"/>rem</quote>.
In praelato, qualiscumque sit, est maior di<lb ed="#Qd"/>gnitas
quam in aliquo subdito; ergo maior ve<lb ed="#Qd"/>neratio
debetur malo praelato quam bono subdito.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e593">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Contra: 1. Maior est dignitas<!--e--> imaginis in
<lb ed="#Qd"/>bono subdito quam in malo praelato; sed dignitas
<lb ed="#Qd"/>imaginis ratio est quare <quote>nos ad<!--f--> invicem adora<lb ed="#Qd"/>mus</quote>,
ut dicit <name>Damascenus</name><!--1-->; ergo maior ve<lb ed="#Qd"/>neratio
debetur bono subdito quam malo praelato.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s1q2t1d3c2-d1e607">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Solutio: Dicendum quod malus praelatus, in
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quantum praelatus, magis debet honorari quam
<lb ed="#Qd"/>bonus subditus, quia magis est in participatione
<lb ed="#Qd"/>debiti honoris, quia est honor gratuitus . debitus
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ex necessitate et est honor gratuitus<!--g--> non de<lb ed="#Qd"/>bitus
ex necessitate. Primus honor debetur prae<lb ed="#Qd"/>lato
in quantum praelatus, quia, in quantum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>huiusmodi, vice Christi est<!--h-->; unde <title>Rom.</title> 13, 4
<lb ed="#Qd"/>dicit <name>Apostolus</name> de ipso praelato quod <quote>Dei mi<lb ed="#Qd"/>nister
est</quote>. Honor autem gratuitus non debitus
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ex necessitate, debetur bono subdito, et<!--i--> ideo
<lb ed="#Qd"/>magis tenemur ad honorem maiorem<!--k--> praelati
<lb ed="#Qd"/>in quantum praelatus est.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>