-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2.xml
162 lines (162 loc) · 9.32 KB
/
ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>III, P. 2, Inq. 3, T. 2, S. 2, Q. 2, T. 1, M. 3, C. 2</title>
<author ref="#AlexanderOfHales">Alexander of Hales</author>
<respStmt>
<name xml:id="JW">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>TEI encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>III, P. 2, Inq. 3, T. 2, S. 2, Q. 2, T. 1, M. 3, C. 2</title>
<date when="2017-10-16">October 16, 2017</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://www.earlyfranciscans.com">ERC Project 714427: Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought</ref></authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Qd" n="quaracchi1948d">Quaracchi 1948, Volume 4</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-critical-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/master/src/out/critical.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a critical edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2017-10-16" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on"/>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2">
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-Hd1e102">III, P. 2, Inq. 3, T. 2, S. 2, Q. 2, T. 1, M. 3, C. 2</head>
<head xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-Hd1e105" type="question-title">UTRUM IN LEGE CONCESSUM ERAT HABERE PLURES UXORES.</head>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e108">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Item, quaeritur de secunda lege qua videbatur
<lb ed="#Qd"/>esse concessum in Lege habere plures uxores.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e115">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>a. Ad<!--n--> idem est quod Patriarchae habuerunt
<lb ed="#Qd"/>plures uxores, ut Abraham, <title>Gen.</title> 25, et Iacob,
<lb ed="#Qd"/><title>Gen.</title> 29 et 30.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e124">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>17. Item, Lege data, pater Samuelis habuit plu<lb ed="#Qd"/>res
uxores nec in hoc reprehenditur, <title>I Reg.</title> 1<!--o-->, 2;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>similiter et David legitur<!--4--> habuisse plures uxores,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quas non habuisset, si ei licitum non esset.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e136">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>c. Item, dicit<!--p--> <name>Augustinus</name><!--5-->, super <title>Gen.</title> 29:
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-Qd1e140">Obiciuntur Iacob quatuor uxores; sed quando
<lb ed="#Qd"/>mos erat, crimen non erat</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e146">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Contra: 1. <title>Gen.</title> 2, 24: <quote>Erunt duo in carne una</quote>,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>hoc dicitur ad praecisionem. Ergo non possunt
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>esse tres; ergo unus non potest habere duas
<lb ed="#Qd"/>uxores.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e159">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>2. Item, <title>Matth.</title> 19, 4: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-Qd1e163" source="http://scta.info/resource/mt19_4">Non legistis quia qui
<lb ed="#Qd"/>fecit sub initio masculum et feminam creavit eos</quote>,
<lb ed="#Qd"/><title>Glossa</title><!--q6-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-Qd1e170">Non ait feminas, ut unum coniu<lb ed="#Qd"/>gium
sit, non plura</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e176">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>3. Item, <title>Deuter.</title> 17, 17 de rege dicitur: <quote>Non ha<lb ed="#Qd"/>bebit
uxores plurimas</quote>. Ergo secundum Legem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non erat licitum habere plures, sive dicamus le<lb ed="#Qd"/>gem
naturalem sive legem Moysi.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e187">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>[Solutio]: Ad hoc volunt quidam dicere<lb ed="#Qd"/>quod<!--r-->
de pluribus uxoribus habendis aliquando
<lb ed="#Qd"/>fuit dispensatum, et hoc ex causa, propter Dei
<lb ed="#Qd"/>populum<!--s--> multiplicandum, et haec dispensatio
<lb ed="#Qd"/>cucurrit ante Legem et in Lege, cum adhuc
<pb ed="#Qd" n="712"/>
<cb ed="#Qd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>populus paucus erat colentium Deum. Unde haec
<lb ed="#Qd"/>causa, multiplicationis scilicet prolis ad cultum
<lb ed="#Qd"/>divinum, dispensabat cum illis ut haberent plu<lb ed="#Qd"/>res;
postea vero, multiplicato populo, cessavit
<lb ed="#Qd"/>causa et dispensatio.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e216">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Sed obicitur: Nam, secundum hoc, David
<lb ed="#Qd"/>peccavit habendo plures, quia iam populus colen<lb ed="#Qd"/>tium
Deum erat multiplicatus. Item, <title>Deuter.</title> 21, 15,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>super illud: <quote>Si habuerit horna uxores duas</quote> etc.
<lb ed="#Qd"/><quote>non poterit praeferre filium dilectae</quote> etc.. dicit
<lb ed="#Qd"/><title>Glossa</title><!--1-->: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-Qd1e231">Hoc ad litteram faciendum est, ne
<lb ed="#Qd"/>sequatur quis animi sui motum, amorem vel
<lb ed="#Qd"/>odium, sed naturam</quote>. Si ergo ex illa lege con<lb ed="#Qd"/>cedebatur
prioribus habere plures, ergo, cum ad
<lb ed="#Qd"/>litteram observanda sit, modernis lege eadem
<lb ed="#Qd"/>concessum erit habere plures: quod falsum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e246">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Respondeo: Dicendum quod solis regibus
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et quibusdam aliis certis personis dispensatione
<lb ed="#Qd"/>divina concessum erat habere plures, sed non
<lb ed="#Qd"/>plurimas. Certis<!--a--> vero personis, ut Patriarchis
<lb ed="#Qd"/>et Iudicibus<!--b--> et quibusdam Prophetis, conces<lb ed="#Qd"/>sum
est plures habere ex causa praedicta<!--2-->,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>quia necessarium erat ut ex eis multiplicaretur
<lb ed="#Qd"/>proles ad ampliandum cultum Dei. Regibus vero
<cb ed="#Qd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Qd"/>concessum est habere plures tune, ne propter
<lb ed="#Qd"/>defectum successionis regni populus insolescens
<lb ed="#Qd"/>recederet a religione divina. Unde <name>Augusti<lb ed="#Qd"/>nus</name><!--3-->,
super illam legem de rege, <title>Deuter.</title> 17, 17,
<lb ed="#Qb"/><quote>non habebit uxores plurimas</quote>, dicit: <quote xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-Qd1e276">Manife<lb ed="#Qd"/>stum
est Salomonem hoc praeceptum transiisse;
<lb ed="#Qd"/>David autem plures habuit, nec praeceptum prae<lb ed="#Qd"/>teriit:
permissio est enim<!--c--> plures habere, non
<lb ed="#Qd"/>plurimas. Multiplicatio uxorum generaliter prohi<lb ed="#Qd"/>bita
est; permissum est regi plures habere, sed
<lb ed="#Qd"/>non multiplicare, ne<!--d--> multiplicando perveniat ad
<lb ed="#Qd"/>alienigenas</quote>.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e295">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>[Ad obiecta]: 1-3. Et per hoc patet responsio
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad prima obiecta.
</p>
<p xml:id="ahsh-l3p2in3t2s2q2t1m3c2-d1e302">
<lb ed="#Qd"/>Ad illud vero quod obicit ultimo quod <mentioned>haec
<lb ed="#Qd"/>lex ad litteram observanda est</mentioned>, dicendum quod,
<lb ed="#Qd"/>cum<!--e--> Lex ista non dicat <quote>si habeat homo duas
<lb ed="#Qd"/>uxores</quote>, sed dicit de praeterito <quote>si habuerit homo
<lb ed="#Qd"/>duas uxores</quote>, habuisse autem<!--f--> duas uxores potest
<lb ed="#Qd"/>pertinere ad diversa tempora, in quibus aliquis ha<lb ed="#Qd"/>buit
uxores duas successive, unam post aliam prius
<lb ed="#Qd"/>mortuam, non ad idem tempus, in quo aliquis si<lb ed="#Qd"/>mul
habuerit duas uxores. Et hoc modo lex ista<!--g-->
<lb ed="#Qd"/>ad litteram a modernis coniugatis observanda est.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>